Yesterday's article introduced that Huawu is competing for the third place in domestic universities, and each has its own expression, but there is no clear answer in the end. Starting today, we will compare the subjects, scientific research results, faculty, laboratories, etc.

Yesterday's article introduced Huawu ( Fudan University , Shanghai Jiaotong University , Zhejiang University , Nanjing University , China University of Science and Technology ) In order to compete for the third place in domestic universities, each has its own expression form, but there is no clear answer in the end. Starting today, we will compare the subjects, scientific research results, faculty, laboratories, etc. Today is the first article, the subject.

Regarding disciplines, we mainly compare them from four dimensions, namely, the opening of discipline categories, double first-class construction disciplines, national key disciplines, and A-class disciplines in subject evaluation. Among them, the discipline categories are mainly explained from the breadth, while the other three dimensions reflect the quality of discipline construction.

First of all, let’s take a look at the statements of Huawu in these 4 dimensions.

1. Number of disciplines

At present, there are mainly philosophy, economics, law, education, literature, history, science, engineering, agriculture, medicine, military, management, art, interdisciplinary disciplines and other 14 disciplines.

, these five famous colleges and universities, have all made clear statements, but Nanjing University and the University of Science and Technology of China are not clear. There are the other 3 universities, Zhejiang University has the largest number, with a total of 13. Except for military studies, all other disciplines are open; is and is 12 respectively. The data from

shows that Rejiao Zhejiang is already a veritable comprehensive university.

2. Discipline construction quality

It can be seen from the table that Zhejiang University has occupied favorable terrain in the three dimensions that illustrate the quality of discipline construction. First of all, he had 21 disciplines on the second round of Double First-Class Construction Disciplines, and 14 and 21 in national key first- and second-level disciplines, ranking first among the five universities. If these two data are attributed to their discipline breadth, his data once again proves his strength in subject evaluation. In the fourth round of subject evaluation, Zhejiang University has 11 A+ disciplines, far higher than the other 4 universities. According to relevant reports, Zhejiang University has also achieved considerable results in the fifth round of subject evaluation. What exactly? Let's wait and see.

Does this mean that Zhejiang University is already the third school in China? Not necessarily. Please note that 5 of Zhejiang University’s 11 A+ disciplines belong to agriculture and forestry, while the other four universities may not offer agriculture and forestry majors, so this is not very convincing.

So, who is the third school, we look forward to comparisons in other aspects.