1 centripetal force: Only when the team is united can the
Educational institutions with output value of tens of millions and over 100 millions of yuan in the education industry have one characteristic: the core managers of the team have a magnetic field and have strong adsorption energy. The managers and the team are always together, and the voices are always consistent from top to bottom, and the team's backbone forces are highly organized. In contrast, many small and medium-sized educational institutions have unclear core, unclear division of labor, unclear organizational structure, and not very strong basic organizational principles for team members.
has no organizational principles, or blurs organizational goals and loses organizational direction. In addition, managers lack leadership and management capabilities, and centripetal force, and educational institutions naturally weaken.
2 Cohesion: Only by cohesion can we generate strength
Only with centripetal force can the team have the possibility of cohesion. On this basis, especially in small and medium-sized educational institutions, whether individual goals and team goals are unified; in order to achieve common goals, whether there is support for the collaboration process in task decomposition; whether the division of labor is in place in collaboration, clear responsibilities, how to ensure mutual trust in collaboration, track results and other issues are all indicators that test team cohesion.
If a team does not often have collaborative activities, do not train combat on the battlefield, and middle and senior management does not fight side by side with everyone, and do not share success or take responsibility when there are difficulties, then where does the trust, investment, responsibility, and how can the team gather? Only when the team includes cohesion can we generate strength, and we can clarify the division of labor, cooperate with each other in future work and cooperation, and jointly achieve goals.
3 Execution: The bridge between the goal and the result
Many principals often say that The team's execution ability is relatively poor. In fact, this is just a superficial phenomenon, not a problem, and you must think deeply about the reasons behind it.
➤ Execution first requires the execution standard
Back to the origin, what are the team members of the educational institution executing? What is implemented is the plan and goal. So are the goals clear, operational and certain standards during the execution process?
Here reflects the first common sense of management: Management is to let team members know what is important. In other words, whether the manager's decisions or plans can be transformed into actionable behavior. After building this foundation, let’s talk about whether the manager’s execution is powerful.
➤ The result-oriented awareness of team members needs to be enhanced
At present, the market teams in most educational institutions have stronger sense of results than teaching teams, which is related to their assessments linked to their salary and performance. The members of the teaching team do not have enough awareness of generating income and have a strong delivery mentality. So many times customers cannot experience the value they show.
4 Combat power: The ability of the team to obtain results through collaboration
Team members' ability to achieve the goals of organizational development through communication and collaboration is combat power. In the current education industry, the main reasons why the teams of small and medium-sized education institutions are not strong in their combat effectiveness when their personal execution is improved are:
➤ The internal communication mechanism of team members has not been built yet
Most educational institutions have some communication platforms, but in many cases, the communication platform is not interactive enough, inactive, unmanaged, vertically obstacles, and horizontal linkage is not smooth. Faced with market changes and customer demand upgrades, the mobilization and integration of resources are significantly slower, which is an obstacle to the communication mechanism.
➤ Team members lack mutual cooperation with each other or project management support
Without project management methods, it is impossible to break department boundaries. Without process support, it is impossible to control the risks and quality of collaboration.Therefore, in the education industry, process collaboration tools such as PDCA are provided for team collaboration. Once the team insists on using such tools, they will continue to train and continue to fight, and their combat effectiveness will naturally increase.
51 endurance: the team learns and continuously improves the ability
As long as the team can keep pace with the times (adapt to market changes) and continuously improve (control market changes), the team will have endurance. Battery endurance is essentially about whether a team can become a learning organization. In the process of development, people will definitely experience countless bottlenecks. Every time they break through the bottleneck, they are a leap in growth. From the perspective of organizational management practice, every transformation of an organization must be the upgrading and transformation of talents. In today's knowledge economy era, the ability of teams to continue to learn will be the key to whether educational institutions can become bigger and stronger.
