Friends who know the machine circle must know the grudge between DXO and Xiaomi . The Xiaomi 12S Ultra incident that caused a lot of controversy not long ago was its initiation point. The main reason is that Xiaomi soul figure Lei Jun bluntly stated on the eve of the press conference that it would no longer send DXOMARK to test, questioning its fairness. Then, after strict with its position, DXO agency announced that it would pay out of its own pocket to send Xiaomi 12S Ultra.
Then Xiaomi 12S Ultra is far behind Xiaomi 11 Ultra 2's 141 points with a total score of 136. You should know that it is also equipped with IMX989 one-inch bottom and Leica . Although its image strength has been recognized by consumers, the result is not as good as the previous generation of image flagships. This has completely shattered the trust of domestic consumers in the evaluation agency DXOMARK.
However, DXOMARK does not think that after updating the algorithm, they think that after updating the algorithm, they test the phone from a fair and just perspective. As for whether consumers agree or not, it is not something they care about.
I thought this matter had come to an end, but I didn't expect DXOMARK to turn his attention to the Mate50 series launched in September. They announced that they would also pay for the Mate50 Pro out of their own pocket, which instantly attracted the attention of the entire mobile phone circle.
After two weeks of testing, the evaluation agency DXOMARK officially announced the image score of Huawei Mate 50 Pro yesterday, becoming the number one model in DXOMARK ranked first in the world with a high score of 149.
One stone caused a thousand scoops, because it was also given a test, Xiaomi and Huawei had completely opposite situations. Some netizens couldn't sit still, saying that DXO was afraid that it was not for the money, or it was deliberately disgusting Xiaomi. In short, it was because of all kinds of disbelief that Huawei could win the first place.
In fact, it is understandable that netizens have a questioning attitude, because the sensor of Mate50 Pro is still IMX766, and the gap between the hardware and the competitors is not big. Although it can be better under the optimization of algorithm , no matter how strong the optimization ability is, it is impossible to crush better sensors in all aspects. Hardware limitations are still unavoidable.
Here DXOMARK also released the advantages and disadvantages of Mate50 Pro in the evaluation process, but this did not gain the confidence of consumers. After all, once trust is lost, it is indeed difficult to recover.
What I want to emphasize is that we are not saying that Mate50 Pro is just a false name. You should know that Huawei's image strength has become a self-contained person after years of polishing and exploration. I am even a user of Mate40.
: From the Mate50 series, you can know that Huawei has completely got rid of the shadow of the past and goes a step further. There must be Leica's excellent technology accumulation here, and Huawei's own silent cultivation and iteration.
Huawei's photography technology is indeed very strong, but it is now dragged down by the hardware. If the updated IMX989 sensor can be used, the results may be better and more convincing.
