The more common computer operating systems on the market now are Windows and macOS, but the operating habits of the two systems are very different. Windows can be completely exited by closing the window, but macOS cannot. Close the application window in macOS. Why isn't the defau

The more common computer operating systems on the market today are Windows and macOS. However, the operating habits of these two systems are very different. Windows can be completely exited by closing the window, but macOS cannot. closes the application in macOS. Window, why is the default setting not to exit completely?

In the old Mac OS period, there was no multitasking switching function. An open application could control the entire system. According to the Mac OS UI development specifications at the time, an application implemented to process documents should open a window of an empty document when it is started. After closing the document, it should still be able to provide functions such as opening other documents or adjusting settings. In this way, the document window is not equal to the entire application, and closing the document window will not cause the application body to completely exit.

For example, if you open a text processing software, but do not create or open a file, the role of the window is not that great. When there is no window, you can create or open a file or exit through the operation menu. Such a design It's also logical. However, the software at that time generally provided a boot window. These applications are like a "big house", and the window is the "wing room" in it. Closing one of them is only equivalent to "leaving a certain wing of the house". Only explicitly exiting the application can "leave the house" .

Under the system logic of OS X, the window is only a part of the software, not all of it. A program can have multiple windows. In addition to the regular workspace and display area, there may also be tool windows and so on. In comparison, OS X is more like a windowing operating system.