For consumers with a budget of about 200,000, Leapmotor c11 and SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X are both products that can be included in the alternative list. After horizontal comparison, many consumers are actually confused about which one is better, Zero Racing C11 or ID4X? In this regard, the editor, as the owner of SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X, recommends that everyone forget about the Leapmotor c11. As for the reason, it is not that the Zero-Player C11 is not good, but that the SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X is too strong.
In fact, there are many good analysis on which Zero Racing C11 or ID4X is better. Some people compare the space of the two, some compare the configuration of the two, and some compare the driving experience of the two... But I personally think that for a new energy vehicle, safety should obviously be put first, especially both are products that focus on household use, and safety cannot be ignored. Next, let’s review the two safety reviews of SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X. I believe you will understand instantly which is better, Zero Racing C11 or ID4X?
First time: Refresh China Insurance Research security test record
Compared with other brands, only verbally promotes the safety of their own products, SAIC Volkswagen is obviously more direct. When SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X was just launched, SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X directly won the first collision evaluation "full excellence" result in China Insurance Research's history. As the most difficult safety test in the industry to achieve good results, everyone has always thought that "all-out" results are a legend, but SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X accidentally turned the legend into a benchmark.
Some netizens may be curious, is this test of China Insurance Research and Development really difficult? Let me briefly learn about it. This test actually includes four aspects: "collision resistance and maintenance economy", "in-car occupants", "outsiders" and "assisted safety". Generally speaking, there is no big problem for a car to achieve 1-2 excellent results, but it is difficult to achieve excellent results like the SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X in all four major evaluations. So, but from this aspect, is it enough to explain which one is better, Zero Racing C11 or ID4X?
The second time: Successfully deal with the violence test of the Dachedi
If the test results of the China Insurance Research Institute make many people feel that it is too ethereal, then Dachedi Previously violent tests against SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X were much more direct. Compared with the violent tests held by many car companies themselves, the car emperor obviously does not intend to easily let go of SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X. It should be noted that this collision test not only uses heavy objects to directly impact the front, side and rear of SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X, but also conducts special collision tests on the roof.
When I look at the test, I think this kind of test is too harsh. Fortunately, the SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X successfully withstood the test. Even when heavy objects hit the roof many times, the full-field glass zenith of the SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X was not penetrated, which shows how safe it is. Perhaps some people think that such a test is not difficult. To be honest, since the Emperor of Chedi targeted the SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X, no other car companies participated in the challenge, which is enough to prove that this test is terrible. At least Zero Racing C11 has not had such a test, right?
Seeing this, I believe that most consumers should no longer worry about which one is better, Zero Racing c11 or ID4X. After all, from the security perspective, SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X has proved its strength with practical actions, not only better than the Zero Racing C11, but it can even be said to be invincible at the same price. I want to say more at the end of the article, that is, the reputation and sales of SAIC Volkswagen ID.4 X are both rising, and the Zero-Perce C11 is being forgotten. Do you need to say more if you choose?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-