Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing?

2021/07/0807:22:06 car 1890

There are very few classic models built by Chery, and the Tiggo series should be the most valuable for discussion. Among them, the Tiggo 3 "carrying a schoolbag" is still more attractive, because the tailgate has a spare tire attached to it. The design will appear quite tough. Although this car is an SUV with a load-bearing structure and no off-road basis, the price is only 59,900-79,900 after all (it should not be too high), so is the flagship version of this car worth choosing?

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

This requires simple calculation. The old Tiggo only has the natural aspirated option of 1.6L-DVVT technology. The power of the press. Therefore, many old drivers who have paid attention to Tiggo expect to have a 1.5T option. Chery has finally launched this version, and its power reserve standard is as follows.

  1. The maximum power is 115kw
  2. The maximum torque is 230N m (2500~4000rpm)

The parameters are really not good-looking. As a multi-point EFI low fuel efficiency engine , this level is acceptable, but the maximum torque cannot reach the peak until 2500 rpm , which is a bit difficult to understand; generally, the engines set in this way are usually medium and large displacement superchargers with a maximum torque in the range of 380-500N m. If the maximum torque can be released at a low speed, the vehicle will be difficult to control. The service life will also be affected. However, the Tiggo 3-1.5T is only 230N m after all, and the torque base is relatively low. Only when the maximum torque is output at low speed can it have an ideal sense of acceleration; for example, the Arrizo GX-1.5T can operate at 1700-4000rpm. The range maintains the peak value, and the explosive power in the 1700-2500 rpm range must be more ideal than Tiggo 3.

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

The curb weight of Tiggo 3-1.5T is expected to be around 1380kg, and the thrust-to-weight ratio of this engine is over 110Hp/T, which is not bad. In theory, the acceleration from 100km/h should reach the standard of 9 seconds, but the actual performance is still will be worse. Because it is equipped with a continuously variable transmission, the transmission efficiency of this kind of transmission can exceed 80%, even if it is good, but the power loss is relatively large; so the acceleration performance of this car should be around 10 seconds, and the naturally aspirated version will be lower. To about 15 seconds, the progress is still obvious.

This is the level of the drive system of Tiggo 3, CVT is acceptable for entry-level cars, and there is no problem with multi-point EFI. After all, Haval M6, Vision X6 and other cars also use the same engine; However, there are still some differences in the gearbox. For example, the M6 ​​automatic version uses a seven-speed wet dual-clutch, and the new X6 uses the 6AT developed by Geely, and its service life is higher than that of the continuously variable transmission.

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews


How is the driving experience of Tiggo 3?

The body size of this car has reached 4420*1760*1670mm, only the body is already a smaller compact SUV, and the body is also narrower; however, the wheelbase is smaller, the standard is 2510mm, which is smaller than the The Baojun 510 and CS35PLUS of the car are even shorter.

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

The reason for the long car and short axle is that the "rear-mounted spare tire" lengthens the body. If the spare tire cover is removed, the body is only about 4100mm; so the Tiggo 3 is actually just a small car, and the driving space will naturally not be very ideal.I have actually used Tiggo 3 for a period of time (ten years ago), and I have a very deep experience with the space; the rear leg room of the vehicle is small but the trunk space is not bad, so many car owners move the rear seats back, The space has been improved but the cargo space has been compressed. The key point is that the design of the rear seats of this car is rather strange. After the seats are folded forward, they cannot be completely flattened, and there is a large gap with the trunk space.

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

This is the characteristic of Tiggo's trunk, which makes it more troublesome to prevent large-sized goods; therefore, if you choose Tiggo 3, you must first experience the space. Many configurations of the car can be upgraded and modified, but only the space structure cannot be changed. It is good to have a simple understanding of the configuration. There are two airbags in the front row, and the auxiliary configuration includes basic configuration such as reversing image and cruise control; other configurations include sunroof, leather seat, 8-inch player without navigation module, using Manual air conditioning and halogen headlights. Is

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

Tiggo 3 worth choosing? —— Taking the price of 79,900 as a reference, if there is a requirement for space, it is recommended to consider the following two cars.

1: Haval M6 automatic version, with a guide price of 81,900-92,900. The body size reaches 4664*1830*1729 and the wheelbase is 2680mm. This is a large five-seat SUV with a very prominent space advantage; the body structure is made of 65% high-strength steel, and the front McPherson and rear double wishbone independent suspensions are used. The overall standard is higher than Tiggo 3. The characteristics of the engine and gearbox will not be repeated. It should be noted that this car is about 200kg/kg more than the Tiggo 3, and the fuel consumption will inevitably be higher due to the weight of the car, with an average of about 9.5L/100km.

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

2: Vision X6-6AT version, the guide price is 84,900 (actually lower than 80,000). The body size is 4546*1834*1715, the wheelbase is 2661mm, the space level is between the two cars, the independent suspension is also used, and the body materials are relatively solid; the curb weight is 1.6 tons, the fuel consumption is on par with the Haval M6, and the configuration level is the same as that of the Tiggo. 3 in the middle.

These two cars have more ideal space, and the design is slightly more fashionable; if you can accept slightly higher fuel consumption, it is recommended to choose one of the two, otherwise, Tiggo 3 can also be considered.

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews

Classic model analysis: Is Tiggo 3-1.5T worth choosing? - DayDayNews


Edit: Tianhe Auto-Automotive Science Island

days and MCN release, copyright protection rights reserved

If you like our content, please like and follow


car Category Latest News