On August 18, an online writer posted on a social platform saying, “For a long time, I have thought that Baidu Netdisk’s review mechanism is reviewed by an algorithm, but what I didn’t expect was that it was manually reviewed, and the reviewer turned out to be It also spreads the

htmlOn August 18, an online writer posted on a social platform saying, “For a long time, I have thought that the review mechanism of Baidu Netdisk was reviewed by an algorithm, but what I didn’t expect was that it was manually reviewed, and the review The member actually spread the user's picture to the Internet. "

She also said, "Even if the user's picture is painted, the user's picture cannot be saved and spread to the Internet at will." htm. After the l3

incident, Baidu Netdisk stated, "Baidu Netdisk did not use manual review. This news is rumor information. Please delete the relevant information immediately, otherwise Baidu Netdisk will use legal weapons to protect its own rights and interests."

can be seen , Baidu has its own review mechanism, and Baidu's review mechanism has the characteristics of multi-dimensional review. Through the algorithm review mechanism, it can also detect various illegal content. In addition, Baidu's review algorithm supports detection of text, images, videos, audio and other fields.

On the evening of 18th, Baidu Netdisk officially issued a solemn statement through its official account. The content showed that Baidu Netdisk does not have so-called manual photo review, and the audit content circulating on the Internet is rumored information. Please spread false information on the Internet, otherwise Baidu Netdisk will pursue its legal responsibility.

In addition, Baidu Netdisk also released three security systems and certification information. Whether it is the technical layer or the product layer, Baidu Netdisk does not have "manual review of user photos".

On August 20, Baidu Netdisk once again issued a statement, which showed that the screenshots of the " Youth League Society Recruitment Review" circulating on the Internet were purely malicious rumors. The evidence shows that Baidu Netdisk has already ordered two bloggers to delete relevant content and change their IDs.

At present, Baidu Netdisk has obtained relevant evidence and has taken measures to call the police to resolutely safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.

In addition, Baidu Netdisk also released four pictures, the contents of which include two lawyer letters and one case receipt information.

What do you think of this?