——Universal Help Community Residents Comprehensive Services Qilihai WeChat myxfwa
I would like to ask you, what would you think if you read this story? How would you feel? Hope someone with insight can tell me.
The way to carry water is relatively long. Picking one tank a day makes you tired and unwilling to do it. So the three monks discussed and divided the journey into three equal sections, each picking a section. Everyone is not tired, and the water will be full soon. This is a collaborative approach, also known as "mechanism innovation."
Three monks formulated a new temple rule: whoever chooses more will have a dish for dinner at night; whoever chooses less will eat plain rice without any dishes. The three monks tried their best to pick, and the water was full after a while. This method is called "management innovation"
The three little monks discussed it. It is too tiring to carry water every day, so we have to find a way. There are bamboos on the mountain, cut the bamboos and connect them together, the center of the bamboo is empty, and then I bought a reel. The first monk shook a bucket of water, the second monk was in charge of pouring the water, and the third monk rested on the ground. The three of them took turns changing shifts, and the water was full in a while. This is called " technology innovation ".
On the issue of the existing production tools, three people take turns to carry water under the unified arrangement of the abbot. Each person can apply for a shift change if there are special circumstances such as discomfort, but the amount of water the three people drink is definitely inconsistent, but in There is definitely no way to be absolutely fair in the team. On the premise that everyone has an emotional foundation, everyone should not mind these injustices.
If there is such a situation: "The amount of water the fat monk drinks is too much to the sum of the young monk and the thin monk", the fat monk can be asked to choose two days in each shift cycle, and the rest one day.
is divided into and .Those with good physical strength are responsible for carrying water, cleaning, etc., those with good eloquence are responsible for alms increasing financial income , those with good skills are responsible for cooking and taking care of temple pilgrims and other activities. This model of
will also have drawbacks. For example, the monks who beg for help will think that I feed you, and they will be arrogant. Because of different lives, everyone will have differences. If there is a conflict, the three people should adopt a relatively fair shift system. After everyone has experienced different jobs, there must be someone who does the best in a certain item, and then everyone will be convinced to accept the division of labor.
