The previous midfielders ranged from Zidane to Pirlo to Xavi Xiaobai and then to Magic Flute. Their data were not particularly outstanding. Even now, it can be said that it is very ordinary, but its actual influence on the game can beat De Bruyne. Why?
Because data can be cheated! That's right, objective data cannot be faked. However, in terms of reference value, data cannot represent everything. Not to mention the role of "midfield organizer", even the forward position on the football field, we dare not say that whoever has the best data will definitely be the strongest. Otherwise, wouldn't Croze be stronger than Ronaldo ? Is it possible? impossible! Let’s talk about the field of midfield masters, we dare not “data theory only” even more.
We all know, which attribute is the most important of midfielders, especially organizational midfielders? The ability to control the rhythm of the game is the most important! The word "controlled field" sounds a bit mysterious, and you can't explain it with data - you can't describe the player's "controlled field" by "completed N goals" or "sending N assists". However, you will find that midfielders like Zidanepir Lojavi Modric have ordinary personal data. However, as long as they are on the court, the offense and defense of their team will form a whole.
In other words, they are more like commanders who plan their own strategies. This is like you are the commander of the army. Is it important to kill how many enemies you directly in a war? It doesn't matter! The most important thing is that as the head coach, whether you can maximize the combat effectiveness of the army and how much data you kill in an individual is the young general's business, not the head coach's task, at least not the head coach's main task. Otherwise, the personal data of Zhuge Liang on the battlefield is so poor. In "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", he only completed the data of "Illegal Wang Lang" killing the enemy this time. Why is he qualified to be a military strategist?
This is true in the military field, and so is the football field. If you are just a functional player, it is really important to how much data you complete. If you are the core of the commander of the three armies, your on-court task will definitely not be able to complete the number of goals or assists, but to see if you can complete the overall advancement of the team's formation through every time you get the ball, get the ball and run without the ball. Not only do you have delicate footwork, but you also have a good overall view and a broad vision. As long as you are on the court, the team's midfield will run smoothly. For example, Zidane of the 2006 World Cup and Pirlo who played with injuries in the 2010 World Cup are the same.
Obviously, Belgian team's De Bruyne has not reached this level. De Bruyne's passing level is very high, but he is more like a traditional midfielder with big opening and closing. De Bruyne can be like a fish in the Premier League. Once he runs to a higher level World Cup, European Cup or Champions League football arena, you will find that De Bruyne is simply a foreign war layman. He has the ability to pass and score, but he does not have the ability to control the rhythm of the game. Not only does De Bruyne not only cannot control the ball, but he also cannot use his ability to control the rhythm of the game to command the offense of the entire team. He does not have the ability to sort out the midfield and will definitely not be able to control the field.
The fierce competition in the World Cup is not comparable to that of the Premier League, and De Bruyne’s problem is not that his personal data is not good, but that he does not have the ability to drive the team and his existence. The overall strength of the Belgian team has not improved the entire level. This lack of field control ability is also the gap between De Bruyne and his midfield masters such as Danepir Lojavi Modric. De Bruyne is an excellent passer, but he is not a great midfield organizer.
Conclusion: Judging from De Bruyne's performance in the competition, the data of current midfielders is really deceptive. The Belgian team lacks an "organized midfielder" and can only allow "data-based midfielder" to be the core. No wonder the "Golden Generation"'s achievements in the World Cup have always been worse than expected.Do you think the midfielder's data is important? If you think it is important, reply 1 and not important, reply 2. Welcome to post your opinion in the comment section. I am a senior ball blind green watcher who pays electricity to watch football. I wish you a happy chat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-