There is always love in thousands of mountains and rivers, can you just like and comment?
Irving and Durant
The transaction between Irving and Durant is more like a farce, and both parties may eventually stay with the Nets. From the analysis of Irving's choice, he is not a "god", at least in terms of salary, he still has to "eat the fireworks of the world". Durant is completely overconfident. He failed to stand up for Irving and even offended Tsai Chongxin , which affected his own reputation. Therefore, what the two owners who are struggling to get off the horse may just need a step up. If there is no suitable deal at this stage, it is not impossible for them to stay on the team. The Lakers should learn from the lessons of Leonard's signing and launch Plan B as soon as possible when the prospect of Irving's trade is unclear. This will not only put pressure on the Nets, but also give themselves a backup plan. Among them, Rockets Eric Gordon , Pacers Buddy Hield and Myles Turner are all safer choices.
Irving and James
There are variables in the Irving transaction
The Nets Due to differences between Irving, Durant and owner Tsai Chongxin, the two stars have the idea of leaving the Nets. However, the Nets have Durant's four-year contract, and they have the absolute initiative in Durant's transaction. Theoretically, as long as the salary meets the transaction requirements, the Nets can trade Durant to any team regardless of his feelings. If the Nets choose a weak team for Durant, Durant will definitely not be willing to do so, so he may have no choice but to stay and continue to play for the Nets.
Owen
Owen's situation is different. Irving exercised his player option, but only had a one-year contract. The Nets must either reach a consensus on a contract extension with Irving within one year, otherwise it is very likely that Irving will leave after the season. By then, the Nets will have nothing to lose, so many teams are betting that the Nets will definitely trade Irving away from the team this season. This allows teams with insufficient chips like the Lakers to see the possibility of lowering prices. However, if Durant stays on the team, Irving may also settle the differences with the Nets management and choose to continue cooperation. After all, the Nets can meet Irving's salary needs.
Jenny Buss
Therefore, the only team that is interested in Irving may indeed be the Lakers, but Irving's next team should also consider his current team, the Nets. If the Lakers want to acquire Irving, they should take action as soon as possible. By scrutinizing several draft picks, they may miss an excellent opportunity to improve the team's strength. After all, it’s not often you see a player like Irving being traded while still under contract.
Buddy Hield
The Lakers should have a plan B
The Los Angeles Lakers are competing with the Nets in the pursuit of Irving, but they must have their own plan B, otherwise they are likely to repeat the same mistakes. Previously, the Lakers originally hoped to introduce Leonard to form a "Big Three" lineup of Leonard, James and Davis. As a result, Leonard eventually joined the Clippers, and the Lakers missed the opportunity to sign. Although the Lakers eventually won the championship, if the team could get Leonard, they would not have been in the embarrassing situation of not being able to even enter the playoffs play-offs in the past season.
Eric Gordon
The Lakers' Plan B, I think should target three people: Eric Gordon of the Rockets, Buddy Hield and Myles Turner of the Pacers. These three players are the players that the Lakers have the opportunity to replace with their existing assets. Gordon and Hield 's shooting ability is what the Lakers lack, while Turner 's interior defense, mobility and space attributes This is also what the Lakers lack. Therefore, instead of waiting for the Nets to trade Irving, it is better to turn to Plan B. Of course, if Pelinka is able to recruit one of Gordon, Hield, Turner and Irving, it will definitely be an S-level operation in the offseason, but after rational discussion, this is unlikely.
Turner
simulated transaction
The Pacers are a team aiming to rebuild, and young players and draft picks are the chips the team needs. After the Pacers sent Brogdon , it has been confirmed that as long as the price is right, the team will start the transaction. Players the Lakers can move include Tucker Jr., Nunn and Westbrook, as well as at least two first-round picks. Westbrook's contract is worth $47 million, but fortunately it is an expiring contract. If the Pacers accept Westbrook, the Lakers, plus two first-round picks and several first-round pick swap rights, have a chance to acquire Hield and Turner.
Westbrook
The Lakers and Rockets trade for Gordon is easier. If the Lakers are willing to part with a first-round pick, they can almost give away Westbrook. However, for the Lakers, it would be a bit of a disadvantage if they only get Eric Gordon with a first-round pick. After all, the team's salary space is seriously insufficient, and Gordon's age and injuries are also factors that must be considered. Therefore, I think the Lakers should pursue Hield and Turner from the Pacers.
Nunn
’s most perfect plan is to start a three-way transaction with the Nets and Pacers. The Lakers sent Westbrook, Tucker Jr., and Nunn, acquired Irving from the Nets, and acquired Hield and Turner from the Pacers. The Lakers may need to pay a lot of draft picks. They currently have the 2023 first-round pick (the Pelicans can exchange it), the 2024 or 2025 first-round pick (the Pelicans can choose one of them), and the Lakers can send away the 2023 and 2025 first-round picks. The first-round picks in 2024 or 2025, 2026 or 2027, 2028 or 2029 can also be combined with the first-round pick swap rights in the middle. Based on James' age and condition, I think the Lakers' first-round pick has a certain transaction value. If the Lakers send five first-round picks and the swap rights of several first-round picks, they should be able to negotiate a three-party deal. In addition, some friends think that the Lakers should not continue to trade first-round picks, but I think that big-market teams like the Lakers do not rely on the draft to start. They can wait for other teams to develop players before starting to compete.
