Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength

2021/09/1620:29:05 sports 1524

In the sports circle, some people are nostalgic for the glory of the past, and they are called ancient blows. Some people love the current excitement the most, and they are called dead fans. Everyone has their own rhetoric and each has their own reasons. It is wonderful to not give up to each other.

Which is stronger and weaker, or should be treated rationally. However, the editor insists that, when comparing and evaluating, try to stand from the perspective of a third party and be reasonable and well-documented.

First, when talking about personal strength, we should look more at his independent performance on the court. It is obviously incomprehensible to refer to his team championships too much, because there are many team championships, so the players are strong. This is the fallacy of Hongguoguo. It is true that the number of team championships must be one of the reference standards for athletes' strength, but obviously it is not the most important. Otherwise, if you look at the meaning of the game, wouldn't it be good to directly measure the number of team championships? Dani Alves, the team with the most honors, is the best football player in the world? Like Dutch football godfather Cruyff, the national team has no honor, but he is among the top five in history.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

Second, when arguing which is better and worse, you cannot simply use the argument that society is progressing and sports are developing. It is the argument that the athletes must be better than before. In addition to scientific training and reasonable diet, the athlete's success is also closely related to his efforts, especially his talent. Basketball superstar Michael Jordan is still an insurmountable mountain in the NBA, and the flying man Bolt 's 100-meter record will not be broken for 50 years.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

Bolt and his world record

In order to better understand, today the editor takes Chinese sports as an example to prove why it is impossible to simply assume that the current athletes must be better than the previous ones.

1. Football: Fan Zhiyi / Zhang Linpeng .

Fan Zhiyi is the Asian footballer , whether it is Wu Lei from the same school,Zhang Linpeng, who is still in the same position, can't compare with him in strength. And Zheng Zhi still persists at 41 years old, which shows that there is no good player to replace him. The strength of football players from the 1890s to the beginning of the 20th century crushed. Now, there is basically no controversy among fans.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

2. Basketball: Yao Ming / Zhou Qi .

This does not need to be repeated, the gap is so great that it can be seen with the naked eye. Wang Zhizhi, Battelle, Liu Yudong, Hu Weidong, Sun Jun, Gong Xiaobin, Li Nan, Fan Bin, , etc., all have distinctive features, no matter they are the Jiang, they are all distinguished by technology. , Confrontation, and projection are all top-notch masters in Asia.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

3. Athletics: Liu Xiang / Xie Wenjun .

Liu Xiang's height cannot be forced to reach Xie Wenjun, because no one will reach it in 50 years. It is not only the breakthrough of the Chinese people, the Olympic record has been maintained for 17 years, and the world is also helpless.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

4. Chess: Hu Ronghua / Wang Tianyi .

Hu Ronghua dominated the individual competition for 10 consecutive years, and he could win the national championship at the age of 60. The strength of two people cannot be measured solely by the winning percentage and the number of champions, but by their chess moves and battle results. Xiaobian, as the eighth player in the industry,Under the explanation of professional chess players, he can basically understand the game of the two players. Wang Tianyisheng, who is a computer teacher, is tightening fences and airtight, but Hu Shiling has more advantages in setting traps, fierce offensive, and abandoning pieces to fight. The two have had the only match. Wang Tianyi was 25 years old in his prime, and Hu Ronghua was 68 years old. Cycling vs. horse artillery is almost irrelevant.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

5. Table tennis: Deng Yaping , Zhang Yining / Chen Meng , Liu Shiwen .

Deng Yaping and Zhang Yining are two great demon kings in history. There are endless disputes about who is strong and who is weak, and no one dares to judge arbitrarily. But at the same time, the strength of the two should be higher than Chen Meng and Liu Shiwen.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

Two Demon Kings

6. Women's Volleyball Team: Feng Kun / Ding Xia .

The women's volleyball team is the only face of China's three major events, and it has basically maintained a stable performance. Can not be compared with the Langping era, after all, the era is long, but individual positions do not have an advantage compared with 2004. Feng Kun's setter level is basically to open his mouth and stuff rice in.

Must the current athletes be better than the previous ones? Don't use the times to measure strength - DayDayNews

There are actually many examples like this, but I don’t mean to say that the ancient ones are better than the present ones, but I want to express a point of view that the era is not a good way to evaluate the strength of athletes!

.

sports Category Latest News