Recently, , Yu Zheng, and were protecting the calf in "I Am an Actor 3", and the hype remained high. Then he was jointly boycotted by 111 writers and should not be hyped on the show. The famous writer and director Guo Jingming was also boycotted this time.
This wave of operations is very similar to that when Yu Zheng’s " Gongsuoliancheng" was suspected of plagiarizing Aunt Qiong Yao’s "Plum Blossom Burning", the front foot also generously accepted an interview and said: "Speaking of Guo Jingming plagiarism, someone sue him, then Did you see anyone suing Zheng for plagiarism?"
Following that, Aunt Qiongyao sued Yu Zhengyi to the court. The lawsuit lasted for 2 years. In the end, Yu Zheng lost the lawsuit and compensated Qiong Yao 5 million (at that time). The highest compensation in the history of literature).
On the evening of December 21, Song Fangjin , Yu Fei and others issued a joint letter from 111 screenwriters, directors, producers, and writers. The letter pointed out that Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming who opposed plagiarism frequently appeared in variety shows. , To conduct topical hype and use it to gain ratings and click-through rates, and appeal not to provide a stage for plagiarism.
co-signed with Qiong Yao, Gao Qunshu, Bai Yicong, Dong Runnian, etc. There are also many works by practitioners under the joint name.
It is true that both Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming have been sentenced by the court to plagiarize other people's works and have been compensated for compensation, but neither of them apologized.
In 2003, the new-born writer Guo Jingming made his mark with his work "How much do you know about flowers in your dreams". But in December of the same year, Zhuang Yu and claimed that Guo Jingming's "How Many Flowers and Falling in Dreams" had copied his own work "Circle Inside and Outside" and filed a lawsuit in court.
Guo Jingming lost the first instance, and subsequently filed multiple appeals, but they were all rejected by the court.
It was not until May 22, 2006 that the Beijing Higher People’s Court made a final judgment, ruling that Guo Jingming and the publisher of "How Many Flowers Fall in Dreams" should compensate Zhuang Yu for economic losses of 200,000 yuan and spiritual comfort money of 10,000 yuan. Apologize publicly.
Guo Jingming compensated Zhuang Yu for the loss, but refused to apologize. And to this day, he has not apologized.
In addition, Guo Jingming signed himself as the screenwriter of the work "Infinite" in "Actors Please Take Place 2" and signed the other two screenwriters as "associate screenwriters", which triggered a dispute about the writer's signature. It is understandable that
safeguards copyright, resists plagiarism, leads the healthy growth of young people, and shapes positive values. This is what we should promote and develop.
and Guo Jingming and Yu Zheng's plagiarism incident is a certainty, and it is true that they refuse to apologize, and they have not responded positively to such matters. The
open letter also mentioned: "Such a "text thieves" are touted as mentors on online platforms and TV stations, and let them sell success studies. This has caused a very bad influence in the society and established a very bad influence on the youth. As a literary creator,
uses plagiarism to steal the fruits of other people’s labor, and then becomes a program mentor. It is a bit nonsense to become a "model" for young people.
Many netizens and viewers have said that the mentality of eating melons is nothing to do with the feeling of hanging up high. This also makes the Internet have no memory and pay more attention to the present.
If this kind of plagiarism is rampant, it will not only chill the original author of the work, but also export a particularly inferior value to young people, and will discourage newcomers who want to enter the field of literature.
We have to give enough respect to the original, and this respect is not only the verbal "protection of copyright", but also the plagiarism will be reprimanded. When Guo Jingming and Yu Zheng refused to apologize, they should be given a blow.
they rely on the stolen informationYuan (works) made a lot of money, turned around and continued his career after compensation. Black and red are also a kind of red. Plagiarism in the film and television industry is very prevalent, and it has lasted for a long time. It is time to curb unhealthy trends.
Just looking at this joint name list, some netizens couldn't bear it, because among these 111 film and television practitioners, there are also suspected plagiarism. Suspected of plagiarism resisting plagiarism? A dog bites a dog's mouth, who is cleaner than anyone else?
For example, the original "Zhen Huan Biography" has also been criticized for plagiarism.
Before the "Three Lives III" was broadcast, the original author of the show was suspected of plagiarism. After the TV show was broadcast, the controversy became even greater, but the screenwriter did not give the audience a statement throughout the entire process, but chose instead silence.
An original work suspected of plagiarism has been remade into a TV series, even if it has become a hit, and the connotation can be imagined.
and Qiong Yao have also been questioned about plagiarizing "Jane Eyre". Tang Qi and Liu Lun Zi were accused by netizens of plagiarism habitual offenders. They must be treated equally, and it would be boring to step on one hand.
This fight against counterfeiting and plagiarism is the same as anti-corruption. You should fight with tigers and flies. What does it mean to fight tigers with flies? I still vaguely remember that my Chinese teacher said when I was a child: There are a lot of copies of articles in the world, see if you can copy.
The definition of literary plagiarism is also very complicated.
According to the principle of "the dichotomy of thought and expression", the abstract ideas expressed in works are not protected by the law, and the law only protects the concrete expression of ideas.
Therefore, it is difficult for the law to judge such hidden plagiarism as plagiarism. For example, the author gangster I think cun sued the original novel of "Zhen Huan" for plagiarism, the case has not been closed yet.
And many works, especially those in the film and television industry, were suspected of plagiarism only after the works were on fire, and at this time the interests of many parties were involved.
At the time of the plagiarism incident, the TV station also played "The Palace Locks" several times when the case was not fully tried.
So, what we should discuss now is how to eliminate this phenomenon and how to deal with it. For projects with plagiarism to terminate the filing, warnings will be issued from the filing stage to kill them in the cradle.
For those dramas that have been broadcast, they should be stopped immediately to protect the rights of the original authors. We must also strengthen the construction of the law. It is only indemnity, and without other measures, it will inevitably be somewhat one-sided.
Putting an end to plagiarism is not only to protect the original, but also to create a good atmosphere. What do you think?
