"The fittest survives the unfit", if this view is correct, then you should tell you that people did not evolve. The logic is actually very simple.
First of all, they say that the fittest survives, so good. If ape and ape exist at the same time, then how can ape survive well today, why did ape evolve? Apes already have better survivability than apes, so why did the ape disappear directly?
Secondly, in terms of the so-called survival of the fittest, apes cannot evolve into apes, and even more impossible to become humans. Today's people are afraid of wind, light, water, fire, etc., basically all kinds of fears. If it is really a simple evolution, they should have evolved into a more compulsory body, with faster speed and explosive power, sharper teeth and claws, and fur that is more adaptable to the earth's environment. Why is this thing not used?
Finally, let’s ask another question: Cats and dogs, as human pets, have a history of more than a thousand years, but have their interactions with humans evolved into a language of communication? Even if humans train, they are still in conditioned reflex today, right?
So humans cannot be a simple animal evolution. If the predecessor of humans was just an animal, humans should have evolved into a stronger body. With a stronger body itself, it is already adapted. How can we use our brain to think about things?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-