Academician of Beili kissing door:
Moral bitch,
Scientist is our Future
Text | Wumanlanjiang
(01)
(01)
all blame the epidemic.
makes a Beijing Polytechnic Academician kissing the door.
is like this. Because of the epidemic, red and yellow horses are flying all over the sky, making it difficult for everyone to move forward and it is difficult to go out. If you have anything to do, you will say it online.
includes academic conferences, everyone can watch videos, eat while analyzing, without delaying.
So some time ago, an academician hosted an important video conference.
The attendees made various speeches and reported to the academicians.
Then a young scholar asked his senior: Teacher, as a young scholar, in addition to constantly improving his research level, what aspects do you need to improve?
Academician has not answered yet, but the answer jumped out by himself:
——A girl appears in the video.
Netizens described: "The woman is about 30 years old. She is wearing a blue sleeveless skirt, her long black hair is gently tied behind her head, and her skin is white and white."
The skin is white...Okay, just see Bai Chen.
"I saw her floating lightly behind the academician, hugging his neck, and kissing him wildly on the big face of the academician."
Next is: "Exercise too much force, hair is distracted" and so on.
kissed. Everyone, in the spirit of scientific and realistic, measured the kissing indicators:
According to statistics, the girl kissed three times, which took 1.6 seconds.
so each kiss is 0.5333 seconds, right?
, we don’t understand, a layman, how much does it take to kiss each time to meet international standards?
The situation at that time was that the participants waited patiently for the three kisses and continued the video conference.
Everyone is a scene-like person, and they are commonplace and are not surprised when they are in chaos-but obviously, it took 0.5333 seconds to kiss, which obviously does not comply with international standards.
The evidence is that someone released this video, so the incident became popular.
(02)
Beijing Institute of Technology issued a statement:
is serious, such a small matter.
If I were having dinner at Beijing Institute of Technology, I would never support investigating this bad incident. Look at the two parties involved, one is 64 years old and the other is 34 years old. They are both adults, both academicians and postdoctoral fellows, and they are all high-end talents.
You have a survey team, members can’t be illiterate, right? No matter how academic qualifications are, you cannot be lower than doctoral degrees. Is it easy to train a few doctoral degrees in the country? You don’t let them do serious scientific research projects, but let them measure the kissing time and waste talents.
Besides, how to investigate this matter?
He is busy with scientific research, and you group of people rushed over: Comrades, the east wind blows, the war drums beat, who is afraid of who in today's world? It’s not that the people are afraid of the US imperialist, but that the US imperialist has become a broken drum and beaten by thousands of people. All projects are stopped. Science is not important to research. Scientists’ crotch is more important than anything else. What academician, have you kissed someone recently? Come here to report to us, who have you kissed? Where did you kiss? How often do I kissed it? Apply before kissing? Which leader did you report to after the kiss?
... Listen to it, isn't this too nervous?
In short, Beijing Institute of Technology issued a statement, and there is no problem in stopping public opinion.
But if you really investigate this matter, it will deviate from academics and be too close to asylum .
is not necessary.
(03)
Some netizens also said that the academician of Beijing Institute of Technology kisses the door and must investigate it because this may involve academic corruption.
Maybe, but you can't understand the academician kissing the door alone.
must have an reference system . If
is not referenced, you cannot explain it clearly. For example, a person's figure is a giant compared to Wu Dalang . But compared with Yao Ming , he is a dwarf. After talking for a long time, you still don’t know whether he is tall or short. You must refer to the average height of Chinese adults before you can have a sensory understanding.
The reference system for Academician’s kissing door is - Prince Zhou of Jiangxi.
Who is the Prince of Zhou in Jiangxi?
A long time ago, there was a doctor on the Internet, a state-owned enterprise employee who showed red wine and Moutai in various ways, and also had no way to find a job, which caused an uproar. After the big wave of
, the local government expressed a "investigation".
Then there was no movement.
Let’s compare Mr. Zhou with the academician to judge the nature of the kissing door:
The first, the academician is a scientist who has made outstanding contributions in the field of scientific research, while Mr. Zhou of Jiangxi is just a second-hand man who eats state-owned resources.
In a simple sentence, the male academician of the kissing door incident is an expert in material mechanics . He has expanded the relevant theories of basic research and transformed his research results into more than a dozen scientific instruments with independent intellectual property rights, and sold them in various ways.
Academicians also have monographs, such as "Physics and Mechanics Calculation Methods for Power-Electric Coupling". Although the books of academicians are not as popular as " Dream of Red Mansions ", there is no such thing as "Dream of Red Mansions" - but those who can understand the monographs of academicians are a good talent in any country.
In comparison, Mr. Zhou has no monographs, not even non-monographs, but he is a high level of cursing people online.
This is the first element of comparison between the two parties. The conclusion is that academicians are scarce and expensive, while bad people like Mr. Zhou are definitely not scarce.
The second one, the academician was just kissed a few times in his old face, while the ones Zhou Gongzi showed off were all "people's fat and folk cream".
If you have to tell the truth, the academician kissing the door is just a private matter.
Some people are worried that the beautiful doctor kissed the academician. Will the academician let the project go?
This worry is too much.
Whether it is academicians or beautiful doctors, the research field they are in is not something ordinary people can understand at all. You don’t know if you let the water go, you can’t see the sneaky fish, you don’t know anything about controlling the desire but you are so strong, are you shameless?
On the contrary, in the case of Mr. Zhou of Jiangxi, neither red wine nor Moutai, his salary is affordable. The academician has a complete private matter, and Mr. Zhou is the perfect people’s interests. Everyone closed their mouths firmly in front of the interests of the people, but their eyes were fixed on the scientist's crotch. You say, is this brain still normal?
The third one, the research results of scientists are more important than his crotch.
Netizens are not completely confused.
View this:
This is also an article written by a friend who cares about the crotch of a scientist.
But the article is very witty. The article
implies that the girl who kissed the academician may have been sent by "hostile forces" to destroy our old academician.
Although this statement is super funny, the author of the article is very clear-minded - the scientist's crotch is not important, the scientist's research is important. Staring at the crotch of scientists will only ruin ourselves, and staring at the research of scientists is the main thing, OK?
So, if the investigation of Beijing Institute of Technology is as silent as Mr. Zhou, then we have hope.
But if - in the end, what is the matter of the academician, then it's over. Not only is Beijing Institute of Technology finished, but even this nation has no curse.
(04)
So our attitude towards this matter is to recommend letting the academician go and continuing to kiss?
is not.
First, international competition, what we have never competed for is morality, but scientific research ability.
Morality is an excess in any country and in any era.
is not scarce at all.
Even an illiterate person can think that he is "moral noble" without reason.
But international competition is never moral.
is technology and economy.
The United States will no longer sell your chips, and we have blocked our technology. Everyone asked you if there is any solution. You glared: I didn’t steal people, I didn’t raise a man, I am doing it right and honestly... Do you think you can make a chip like this?
is not just an academician, but even a death row prisoner who created an invention before his death, and the death row immediately became lifeless. It was nothing more than morality and fools. But we have too few experts in material mechanics.
The second one is morality and the science belongs to science.
Some people have no ability, only "morality" is left.
Then let them not run around without any trouble and kiss others when they see them. If you don’t have the ability to build, it is a merit not to cause trouble to everyone.
Some people have the ability, such as the academician of Beijing Institute of Technology, then scientific is science, and moral is morality - meaning that if he kisses his wife, it is a good thing. If he kisses someone else's wife, then let the other person's husband come to reason with him, be careful not to do anything, don't hit the head, don't beat the academician in a stupid way, keeping his brain is useful... It's not okay to beat the leg. Although the academician will not delay making contributions to the country even if he sits on a wheel ride, the consequences of beating people are serious and he will be detained. So you have to find a "scientific" strategy and ask for an explanation. Everyone is a scientist and a person at the top of the intellectual pyramid. It is really too easy to deal with this little thing, isn’t it?
The third one, our society is actually very immoral.
This video of Academician kissing the door will not be released under normal circumstances. The reason why
was released was that the person who released the video knew that this incident would cause trouble to the parties involved - and the reason for the trouble came from the public's interest in scientists, which was far greater than their interest in scientific research projects.
This is like society, who is not interested in children's academic performance - but he shows strange excitement about children's friendship. Although a society like
is filled with strong moral anxiety, it is actually the most immoral.
So today's question is:
An immoral society will amplify private behaviors. For example, academicians kiss the door, which is a private matter, but Beijing Institute of Technology issued a statement to avoid the disaster of the fish. This means that our social morality has been out of control. So do you know how this situation happened? What is the relationship between morality and social development?
(*The pictures in this article are from the Internet)
