leaves a small scar and thinks that he has a scar constitution. Is this really the case? [what]
Today I will give you a detailed science: [Smile]
What are the reasons for the formation of scar ?
The wound appears differently, and the severity of scars is also different. Some parts are very prone to scarring, which has nothing to do with whether it is a scar constitution. First of all, it is related to the degree of skin tension and thickness. Scars are easily left in areas with high tension, such as the front chest, back, joints, neck, etc., and relatively thick earlobes are all easily left in scars. On the contrary, if the skin is thinner and looser, the tension is less likely to occur, scars are not easy to occur. The second is blood circulation. The richer the blood circulation, the faster the healing, that is, scarring is not easy.
Patients have keloids left by ear piercing
So how do they determine that they have scar constitution?
Sections where scars are produced
If scars are left in areas where scars are prone to scars, it cannot be accurately judged as scar constitution, because everyone is the same in the front chest, back, and joints. For example, common caesarean scars are caused by large wounds, and most people will leave scars. As time goes by, the scars will gradually reduce and fade. This is a normal phenomenon. We cannot simply think that they are scar constitutions. To determine whether you have a scar constitution, you should judge from the injured part and the magnitude of tension. If scars are left in areas that are not prone to scarring and are becoming more and more serious, it is very likely to be scarred.
or above are the criteria for preliminary judging scar constitution. I wonder if you have learned it? [Personal]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-