text / 一曰
A lawyer surnamed Wei in Xi'an sued the manufacturer of Master Kong's Lao Tan Sour Lai instant noodles due to the exposure of this year's 315 party. At that time, various media outlets reported on it, and most of them held positive opinions.
are both lawyers, and Yibao has different thoughts on Lawyer Wei’s actions, so he couldn’t help but talk about it.
As a fellow lawyer, I know that the current society’s perception of lawyers is not that good. When Yi Tao takes the elevator, people often say hello like this: Wow, Yi Tao, it’s better for you lawyer to eat the plaintiff and eat the defendant.
What is the reason? One of the important reasons is that there are always some lawyers who do some very unreliable things, some things that cause controversy, some things with less than simple purposes, and some things to attract attention.
For example, the year before last, a lawyer surnamed Liang in Wuhan filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, , the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Military Sports Council due to the COVID-19 epidemic in the Wuhan Intermediate People's Court, demanding compensation for lost work and mental losses, and demanding a public apology from U.S. President Trump .
For example, last year, a lawyer surnamed Xia kowtowed to the ground and worshiped a lawyer in Kunming as his master. The video of his apprenticeship was uploaded to the entire Internet, making the public feel as uncomfortable as eating flies and attracting many looks of contempt and even contempt.
For example, last year a lawyer named Xu in Shanghai wanted to submit a proposal at the Shanghai "Two Sessions" and suggested setting up a "marriage cooling off period."
Is what these lawyers do reliable? Is the purpose pure? No controversy?
Perhaps these lawyers will argue: "My original intention is good, and my purpose is good." Then can you not do things that seem unreliable, seem to have a non-pure purpose, seem to be just to attract attention, and seem likely to cause controversy? Otherwise, it is inevitable that there will be a suspicion that "the melons and plums are under the fields"!
Some people think that the move of the Xi'an lawyer surnamed Wei to sue Master Kong instant noodles is suspected of "living in the fields of melons and plums"!
Does Lawyer Wei’s actions give people a strong sense of “taking advantage of the publicity”? As long as this feeling exists in society, it is worth considering carefully whether Lawyer Wei should do this or not.
Is it possible that Attorney Wei’s actions may give people a sense that the purpose is not pure? As a lawyer, the purpose of doing this can easily cause controversy and give people a bad impression.
Besides, Master Kong’s Laotan Sour Lai Instant Noodles was exposed at the 315 Party Party, and it is already a “lost dog”. Lawyer Wei chased a drowned dog and then stepped on a drowned dog. At first glance, it seemed that it was not the behavior of a hero.
reminded me of a past incident.
On September 16, 2004, Hao Jinsong, a master of law, spent 100 yuan on a meal on the train, but his request for an invoice was unsuccessful. Master Hao took Beijing Railway Bureau to court on the grounds that not providing official invoices violated the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.
After losing the case, on December 7 of the same year, Master Hao took the Beijing Railway Bureau’s Shijiazhuang Railway Branch and Taiyuan Railway Branch to court on the grounds that the waiter could not provide an official invoice after shopping on the train.
Due to Master Hao’s insistence, the State Administration of Taxation, Ministry of Railways issued the “Notice on Standardizing the Use and Management of Invoices for Railway Passenger Dining Cars” on December 6, 2005, and printed fixed-rate invoices specifically for railway passenger dining cars. Master Hao can be said to have single-handedly corrected the illegal behavior of the railway department.
Master Hao’s prosecution and Lawyer Wei’s prosecution, which one is right and which is wrong, which one is better and which one is worse, which one is higher and which one is lower, the judge has his own scale in mind.
The answer is very simple: I like Master Hao, but I don’t like Lawyer Wei!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-