text: Tianlai Fanying
Picture: Screenshots and Internet
Five months ago, I received the first time I received the quiz invitation from the headline content appraiser . At that time, it was the first time I heard that the "content appraiser" was "official", so I started the test with great enthusiasm, thinking that it was not easy to get it with my years of life experience? Can't write, can't you read it?
1. The previous confusion
result is conceivable, it is not surprising at all. After completing 50 test questions, I immediately received a notice from the headline.
"I regret to notify you that after comprehensive evaluation, this test failed."
But is really unwilling to accept , but it will take a month to take the test again.
However, in the following months, failed repeatedly for trial and error .
Finally, this time, it was finally passed yesterday, so this post was celebrated.
In fact, I saw many netizens posting a few days after joining the headlines, and they easily completed 50 questions in a few minutes and passed the test. It is a scam to say that they don’t envy them.
However, if you know that you have definitely failed to pass it, you must summarize your experience and keep trying.
I have such a stubborn temper. If one thing is easy, it will be fine. The more I can't pass, the more I have to compete, so I keep thinking and trying.
, finally: Hard work pays off.
was really passed yesterday. So I will share my experiences of failure to success with everyone, and give those fellow friends who are still exploring, which can save some time in exploration.
2. Why did you fail to pass the first few times? I have summarized it and there are several reasons.
When I first received the invitation from the tasting officer, I really didn’t know what the tasting officer was. What do you have to do for the responsibilities related to this position, and whether you have the ability to taste the judge needs is ignorant of .
Then, I started taking the exam just by relying on my own with my passionate .
Some friends will say, I am the same, I pass it easily.
Of course, I have also seen that some netizens have not even read a few headline articles before, and they just passed it so easily.
So, it can be said that everything has a luck and a probability.
Some people are born with good luck and are all kinds of luck together. There are indeed such people. After all, this test is a multiple-choice question, so there is a probability problem.
There is another type. In fact, they have a lot of experience in the quality and bad standards of headline articles and the rules of judging the rules. In fact, they already have such ability. That's the saying, opportunities are always left to those who are prepared, so they can also pass it in one go.
The rest are people like us who have no luck and no related matching abilities and skills, so they can only explore.
I did not carefully interpret and understand the scoring standards and related rules of the tasting officer before conducting the test.
I didn’t understand the work requirements of this appraiser, and I haven’t listened and watched the relevant explanation videos and scoring rules carefully, and it makes sense that I didn’t pass it in the end.
You cannot blame the system for the difficulty of the questions, nor do you blame the many questions, you can only blame if you are not serious about .
When the first time they did the test, they followed their feelings, and they were intuition to rate each article tested.
For example, if you encounter a group of pictures and then there is only one paragraph on the picture, you intuitively feel that there is no content, so you give a low score.
There are also some articles that are too long and seem to be too wasteful, so we just score them directly based on the beginning and ending and feeling.
Overall, there is no skill at all, and there is no standard for scoring.
Finally, I would like to mention this question. Although this question is only one of the factors, it has a great impact.
There are some contents you have never seen before, and you don’t know if what others write is good or bad.
and precisely because these contents are beyond your cognition.
That is to say, it is in your cognitive blind spot .
Then, it is quite difficult to rate such articles. The few times I started with
, I encountered many such problems during my own test, which is also a reason for my loss.
However, as long as you have the scoring criteria, this problem can still be solved.
So, let’s take a look at how I solved these problems. After solving them, I have summarized a set of methods and dedicated them to everyone for free.
3. After finding the problem, the method and skills are the key
First of all, we must understand what the appraiser does in the headline content, and what we do in the appraiser.
We have an introduction from the tasting officer test, and is responsible for digging out high-quality articles on the headlines and cracking down on low-quality content.
This is the core of the appraiser and it is also an obligation that you have to bear every day after becoming a appraiser.
So, what are the relevant abilities that are needed to do such a job? It's just a simple understanding, the conditions for joining.
I have sorted out the main points:
has an in-depth understanding of the content;
is familiar with and understands the criteria for judging headline content.
Introduction to the tasting officer and how to apply to become a tasting officer have detailed explanations in the first video of this tasting officer testing entrance. You can read it multiple times to deepen your understanding.
Before participating in the content tasting judges' test, you still have a short video that can understand the concept of rating content.
This short video explains three major contents in detail.
(1) evaluation criteria (three dimensions)
mainly judges the information value, transmission efficiency and aesthetic experience of the article. The three dimensions of
are the criteria for judgment and must be understood carefully. However, in fact, many people who have not identified other people's works are actually confused. It doesn't matter. Remember a few keywords first according to the following method.
First memorize the excellent standards of three dimensions and use them when scoring them later.
Information value: accurate facts, unique perspective, deep expression, benefit from people
Transfer efficiency: smooth expression, clear logic
Aesthetic experience: comfortable viewing, rich literary
(2) Rating and scoring (five levels)
Our scoring standards are mainly 1-5 points, and
Our scoring standards are mainly 1-5 points, and
htt ml4 (3) Scoring Principle
Of course, everyone has different experiences and experiences during the scoring process, and their views on the content of each article are different. Therefore, there are certain regulations on the scoring principles of each appraiser, and the following principles are followed:
Finally, after many times of scoring based on experience, I summarized a set of standards, which is to determine the score standards from four aspects according to the following standards, so that 4 scores can be given for each article.
Then add 4 scores and divide them averagely by 4 to get the final score of this work.
In this way, there will be no shortage of any aspect, which will lead to large deviations in the scores of the article. Even if you don’t understand the content of the article, you will have some judgment.
I usually get an article and first rate aesthetic experience , because this is the best evaluation. You don’t need to read the content of the article, you can directly give points based on the layout and the aesthetics of the pictures.
Then the second step is to judge topic . In fact, many topics are basically clear at the title or the beginning and end. If it is not clear, you will get 2 points. Common ones are only 3-4 points, basically you have never seen them before, and then you can only get 5 points if you choose meaningful topics.
Next is article or video quality . This requires you to read the article carefully and don’t talk too much, because it depends on your personal accumulation and it is difficult to explain it clearly. But in fact, there are rules to follow, long and golden sentences, and the article finally has various arguments and citations. Needless to say, it must be 5 points. Short ones are actually the most difficult to judge. If you can’t judge them normally, just follow your feelings.
Finally, Sense of harvest , this is enough based on personal experience.
Generally speaking, in this way, the branch given is generally fairer , and , and is more rational .
and then some other excellent netizens have analyzed the articles and typical cases.
share 2 typical cases of learning after becoming a tasting official. It is very meaningful. I hope it will inspire you to read the article.
4. Talk about mentality
After I recognize something, I will do it and will fight .
Or for some people, a tasting test is simply too simple, but it is still a bit difficult for me.
So since ordinary people can succeed, it proves that there is a way here. The rest is to find the way and walk through it. Then there is only working hard and serious .
This is also the creed in my life. When doing things, you must be down-to-earth and serious .
When I was a child, I thought I was very smart, but when I grew up, I realized that the IQ gap between people is not as big as I imagined, and the key to success is not much related to IQ.
Finally, what can determine the achievements of a person is . The word "serious" .
5. It’s only after becoming a tasting officer
Although he became a content tasting officer, this is just the beginning, because the judgment of content and the identification of excellent content are actually just just started . I believe that after seeing more good content, you can also learn from and improve your article quality and content.
Finally, people like me who have failed 5 times and have lasted for nearly half a year can pass it. Believe in yourself and keep trying, and you will definitely be able to become a qualified appraiser.
If you are interested in this area, hope that my detours and summarized experience can help you.
I am Fanying. I hope every article and every work of mine can bring you thinking and cognitive growth and help you. This is my greatest luck. Pay attention to me, grow up with me, and become that true self.
Thank you, so you can take the time to follow me.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-