A few months ago, a netizen introduced to me that this "Old Changtou 929" is a person who criticized Mo Yan and is a retired old worker. Because he took the initiative to be my fan and invited me to visit him. I just noticed him.
opens his web page, my god, hundreds of fans, dozens of posts, but from May 16 to June 11 this year, nearly half of them were attacking me.
I'm so surprised that there are such fans. The core of attacking me is a liar, occupying the platform, praising Mo Yan, and letting Mo Yan be the overlord of the literary world. The dialectical materialism (for my article "Whether there is a historical nihilism in novels") is actually a smear on the Chinese literary world and flattering Mo Yan.
I sent a private message and he ignored it. So on June 13, he published "Learn the facts and reasoning, and reduce misunderstandings" (I) and (II), and publicly answered that he misunderstood me and praised me. I was a self-media individual who "left nothing" at that time, and there were thousands of fans, so how could I have such great energy? And how can I post dozens of articles criticizing Mo Yan become flattering?
But I have always insisted on seeking truth from facts to Mo Yan, and do not know how to comment or write, and just discuss things. And I never attack personally, let alone involve others. I also affirm Mo Yan's advantages. This is not detailed.
I neither blocked Lao Chang's head 929 nor held grudges. I am an old man too. As an old man, he is inevitably confused and has a weak memory. He may only read a title when reading other people's articles, not to mention that he has just made the headlines. Some netizens also advised me to settle things. I also regarded it as a past.
Today I read " People's Daily comments on Mo Yan". I saw him in the past two days, and I have posted four or five articles to expose my rumors and regard the landlord's son as the people's son. What I don’t understand is that this person who accused me of “praising Mo Yan as the overlord of the literary world” was not clear. On the one hand, he criticized me for “having a grudge against Mo Yan”, and on the other hand, he accused me of “having a grudge against Mo Yan” and would be itchy if he didn’t write articles to criticize Mo Yan. (See screenshot 2 below for details).
asked me where the People's Daily published the article, and I couldn't find any rumors. (See screenshot 234). Fortunately, I found out the basis for this post shortly after I posted it, and it was the "Jingzhu Silk Rain" post on June 22, 2022. (See screenshot 1 below).
People's Daily published an article by commentator "Mo Yan's Nobel Prize brings Chinese literature to the world" after winning the Nobel Prize for . The key point is to make the world pay attention to Chinese literature, translate more Chinese works, and narrow the distance between readers around the world and Chinese literature.
I quoted it to be realistic and don’t be too proud to win the Nobel Prize. Winning the Nobel Prize does not represent the direction of Chinese literary and artistic creation. We should also pay attention to negative effects (see my article "The positive significance, negative effects and correct treatment of Mo Yan's Nobel Prize" three days ago).
Lao Changtou 929, self-righteous, please see my evidence. To spread rumors casually is also called spreading rumors.
I am still thinking that we are writing articles and looking for information, and we are excerpted or reprinted, and there are a few large books, so how can we keep our roots everywhere? Fortunately, I haven't been around for a long time and found the basis. Of course, as long as it is not a lie, you can find it. But it wasn't that I accidentally saw him posting, and I never thought that he had posted so many posts in the past two days to attack me. The uninformed netizen really thought he had asked me (see screenshot 4), but in fact, he didn't ask me at all.
From the time he said I was "produced rumors", I felt that he still thought that Mo Yan still thought "provoking" and spread rumors. But in another article, he said that I wrote articles to criticize Mo Yan every few days (I seem to have commented on Mo Yan three days lately), as if I had a grudge with Mo Yan, and I didn't write it. A 180-degree turn. (Screenshot 2)
I really can't figure it out. Of course I can expose my rumors, but sometimes I say that I praise Mo Yan, and sometimes I think that I criticize Mo Yan too much, as if I have a grudge. Let me ask this old man Chang 929, how many articles have you posted to criticize me these two days? What kind of hatred do I have with you? He is also an old man. When others respect you, don’t regard yourself as “the best in the world”. I write articles and post them online, do I still have to go to your place to get the post?
Revealing the "to be the son of the people", (see screenshot 5). Let me tell you, I joined the party in the army in 1966. You said I am materialistic and avoid dialectics. I am so kind. I have not learned to use dialectical materialism in , but I have always adhered to this worldview and methodology, and strive to look at the problem from the correct standpoint.
I posted a few days ago, regardless of the past origin, now "we must be the sons of the people" (there are articles to be found). I said that landlords have been lifted out of poverty for almost 40 years, and it is said that poor and lower-middle peasants have a good background. They were born decades ago. In the past, they were all history, but now they are all people. You can't gather together whether "I" are the descendants of landlords or poor and lower-middle peasants" and you must be the "sons of the people".
The people are a holistic concept, a political concept, which means that we must be loyal to the people today, and not speak from the standpoint of the past class. Is this called treating the landlord's son as the people's son? You are still holding on to the landlords and poor and lower-middle peasants decades ago, and come to see today. May I ask, today, there are really landlords in the country, and I say "removing the hat", which does not include this landlord.
I would like to say boldly that in the past revolutionary period, the landlord and the landlord's son betrayed the original class and devoted themselves to the revolution. "Being the son of the people" is also good. Moreover, there are still many revolutionary teams.
1. About the source of the People's Daily's article
2. About spreading rumors and not criticizing Mo Yan for three days. Itchy hands
3. Three questions (actually, I discovered it accidentally)
4. Revealing the rumors about me.
(
5. Revealing the descendants of landlords "to be the son of the people"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-