7.21 News, the Gansu Government Procurement Network recently issued a decision on the handling of government complaints (Yumen City will approve the grassland ecological restoration and management project in advance in 2022; project number ymzfcg202205160009)
Complainant: Gansu Mammoth Agriculture Co., Ltd.
Respondent 1: Yumen City Natural Resources Bureau
Respondent 2: Gansu Ruize Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd.
After understanding, complaint matter 1: The agency company (Gansu Ruize Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd.) did not clearly provide the requirements for the question reply in the question reply. The specific content, factual basis and legal basis (the reply content lacks specific factual basis and legal basis).
After investigation: According to the "Government Procurement Questions and Complaints Measures" ( Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China Order No. 94), the answer to the question in Article 15 should include the following content: (1) The name of the supplier being questioned; ( 2) The date of receipt of the letter of challenge, the name and number of the questioned project; (3) The matter being questioned, the specific content, factual basis and legal basis of the response to the challenge; (4) Informing the questioning supplier of the right to file a complaint according to law; (5) The response to the challenge Name of person; (6) Date of reply to the query. The complaint was established.
Complaint 2: Bid Evaluation Method in Chapter 3 of the Bidding Documents ( Comprehensive Bid Evaluation Method )
2.3.4 (1) Business Scoring Standard: Comprehensive evaluation based on the bidder’s ability to perform the contract (including construction management level, transportation guarantee, etc.) , a maximum of 6 points. The bidder shall receive 4 points for providing a complete after-sales service plan for this project.
2.3.4 (2) Technical scoring criteria:
1. The construction process has a scientific, reasonable, comprehensive and detailed plan for digging holes, planting, covering soil, etc. (The plan is complete, fully considering the purchaser’s needs, the plan’s pertinence and feasibility are reasonable and feasible: 12-9 points, the plan is relatively complete, it can basically consider the purchaser’s needs, the plan’s pertinence and feasibility are basically reasonable and feasible: 8 -5 points. The plan is basically complete, has certain pertinence and feasibility, but it is not well thought out and has some loopholes. 4-1 points, not provided: 0 points)
2. Provide a complete implementation plan of artificial seeding improvement technology, in line with The location of the project is mainly based on climate characteristics, geographical factors and other conditions (the plan is complete, fully considers the needs of the purchaser, the plan is reasonable and feasible in its pertinence and feasibility: 10-7 points, the plan is relatively complete, and the plan can basically consider the needs of the purchaser, the plan Pertinence and feasibility are basically reasonable and feasible: 6-4 points. The plan is basically complete and has certain pertinence and feasibility, but it is poorly considered and has some loopholes (3-1 points, not provided: 0 points).
3. The construction schedule, mechanical equipment and operating personnel of each stage are reasonably arranged. (A plan that is complete, detailed, targeted, and timely will be awarded 8-5 points. A plan that is complete, targeted, and timely will generally be awarded 4-1 points. A plan that is not targeted or timely will not be scored.)
4. Proposal for this project Reasonable quality assurance, civilized construction and environmental protection measures program. (The plan is complete, fully considering the purchaser’s needs, the plan’s pertinence and feasibility are reasonable and feasible: 8-6 points, the plan is relatively complete, it can basically consider the purchaser’s needs, the plan’s pertinence and feasibility are basically reasonable and feasible: 5 -3 points. The plan is basically complete, has certain pertinence and feasibility, but is poorly thought out and has some loopholes (2-1 points, not provided: 0 points).
5. Have detailed supervision measures during the project implementation period for this project, and establish a complete technical support system (a plan that is complete, detailed, targeted, and timely will be awarded 10-6 points, and a plan that is complete, targeted, and timely will generally be awarded 5- 1 point, no points if it is not pertinent and timely)
6. Scientifically innovative and detailed innovative suggestions for project grassland ecological management (the plan is complete, detailed, pertinent and timely, and will be awarded 8-5 points. The plan is complete. Generally, 4-1 points will be given for relevance, pertinence, and timeliness. No points will be given if there is no pertinence or timeliness.)
After investigation, the scoring method of the bidding document is not quantified, among which "the plan is complete, reasonable, feasible, and the plan is relatively complete." "Basically reasonable and feasible, the plan is basically complete and poorly considered; complete and detailed, targeted and timely, complete, targeted and timely, not targeted and timely" are not quantitative indicators.The complaint was established.
processing decision: In summary, according to the provisions of Article 34 of the "Regulations on the Implementation of the Government Procurement Law of the People's Republic of China" and Article 15 of the "Measures for Questions and Complaints about Government Procurement" (Ministry of Finance Order No. 94), it is determined that The complaint was established. After research, in accordance with the provisions of the "Regulations on the Implementation of the Government Procurement Law of the People's Republic of China" ( State Council Order No. 658) and the "Measures for Questions and Complaints about Government Procurement" (Order No. 94 of the Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China), our bureau has made The handling is as follows:
1. Terminate the bidding process for this project, order the purchaser and procurement agency to modify the bidding documents, and restart government procurement activities.
2. The Yumen Municipal Natural Resources Bureau did not strictly control the preparation and review of procurement documents, ordered it to make corrections within a time limit, and submitted a written rectification report to our bureau.
3. The agency Gansu Ruize Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. rectified the illegal problems in the preparation of procurement documents within a time limit and submitted a written rectification report to our bureau.
According to public information: the registered address of Gansu Ruize Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. is Room 1516, Changrong Building, No. 1, Hongxing Lane, Chengguan District, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province. The legal representative is Ma Mouhe. The business scope is to prepare a project proposal; to prepare an feasibility study. Report , evaluation consulting; project cost consulting, engineering technology consulting, project bidding agency; government procurement bidding agency ; project management and consulting; project supervision (projects that require approval according to law can only be carried out after approval by relevant departments) business activities). ***
According to various investigations, it was learned that the company's person was enforced by the court for failing to perform its legal obligations on time.
Information source: Gansu Government Procurement Network, Qichacha
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-