Jiupai News special commentator Qinchuan
Recently, a 68-minute recording titled " Zhang Wenhong Lecture" and "Zhang Wenhong Answers Response to New Crown ", as well as related compiled texts and summaries, have been widely circulated on social media. In this regard, Dr. Zhang Wenhong, his team, and his friends all refuted the rumors and denied that the recording came from Dr. Zhang Wenhong.
It should be said that with the parties involved refuting the rumors, the recording controversy should have fallen silent. But clearly it left a lot to think about.
pretended to be Zhang Wenhong and spoke, which was definitely not unintentional. In the field of public opinion, Zhang Wenhong is a top-notch person. Many things others say may not attract attention, but what he says attracts high attention. Many things others say have little weight, but what he says carries considerable weight. This kind of pretense is suspected of being illegal. Regardless of whether it makes sense or not, if Zhang Wenhong didn't say it, he can't be named after him.
In the field of public opinion, it has become "fashion" to fake celebrities to speak out. For example, "Lu Xun said that when you reach a certain age, you must throw away four things: meaningless drinks, people who don't love you, relatives who look down on you, and friends who are hypocritical!" Many of the words are clumsy and fake at first glance, but some are confusing and feel like they were said by Lu Xun. Some people pretending to be Lu Xun and speaking out are just for fun, but this time pretending to be Zhang Wenhong is not the case. Some words obviously cannot withstand scrutiny and conflict with some of Zhang Wenhong's previous views. If word spreads and some people believe it, wouldn't it cause harm?
In addition, the person pretending to be Zhang Wenhong this time is "even suspected of promoting products." The purpose of consuming Zhang Wenhong is to bring goods, and he should bear responsibility for doing so.
A few years ago, a WeChat public account was sued by Wang Jianlin, chairman of Dalian Wanda Group , for publishing articles criticizing e-commerce under the name Wang Jianlin. There are many lessons like this: "There is money for a while, but no prospects in the end." This is not the best way to play with fire.
Zhang Wenhong has refuted the rumors, but the paradox is that the articles refuting the rumors are far less widespread and influential than the fake articles. Even if the article refuting the rumor has been seen by many people, the previous fake articles have had an impact that cannot be underestimated. Who will bear this responsibility?
Another detail is that these articles impersonating Zhang Wenhong are often deliberately vague. For example, their title is "New Crown Infection Response Plan (Summary of Zhang Wenhong's Lectures)". If you are more serious, the person involved may be prepared: there are too many people with the same name. I am talking about Zhang Wenhong, and I did not mention Dr. Zhang Wenhong. In fact, this approach is just a clever trick. If it really goes to court, it will inevitably be dealt with by the law.
Dr. Zhang Wenhong is not a traffic password. If you have to stick to others, hug others, and do bad things in a bad way, you will eventually pay the price. Whoever said it said it, as the saying goes, you bear the responsibility. Zhang Wenhong only needs to be responsible for what he said.
Jiupai Comments submission email: [email protected]
[Source: Jiupai Comments]
