is "optimistic", it is not exactly the same
With the "first batch" of people infected with Omickron after the issuance of the "New Ten Regulations" and recovered one after another, the "New Coronavirus Rehabilitation Diary" officially ushered in a situation of multiple samples. In fact, shortly after the "New Ten Regulations" were issued, many celebrities "at the first time" to share their "new crown recovery diaries", but because they are mostly "rich people", there is a saying that "the experience of rich people is not experience" at the public opinion level.
to a certain extent, this has a reasonable part and a biased element. The reason is that the "Yangkang" that comes forward to share is free because of money. Therefore, it is indeed easier to form positive feedback in terms of mentality or in terms of obtaining treatment resources. At least it will not be held hostage by panic because of "difficulty in buying medicine". The prejudice is that it ignores that the first label of "Yangkang" is "physical", not "rich or lack of money", that is, based on age, gender, and status, it can actually be extended to itself.
But even so, most people basically show disapproving the "new crown recovery diary" shared by celebrities. In addition to prejudice, this is also because it is difficult to gain widespread recognition in the early stage of sharing, but with the "New Coronavirus Rehabilitation Diary" becoming more diverse, that is, not only the horizontal distribution of group labels is diversified, but also the vertical levels of groups are also diversified.
In this case, when listening to the "Yang Kangs" telling the " COVID-19 Rehabilitation Diary", you cannot just listen to the optimistic or negative, and you cannot just listen to the optimism and negativeness, and only listen to the middle, but you must bother to face the different narratives of "Yang Kang" with an attitude of listening with both sides. Only in this way can we get rid of panic and face the "sweeping of Yang Waves" more rationally.
From this we will examine the title "How much medicine can you recover from it?" A documentary report from ten "Yangkangs" was interviewed, and the maximum consumption was three pieces of ibuprofen . It can only be said to be "relatively optimistic". Even if this exists objectively, based on the sample capacity , it can only represent the situation of a certain number of people.
The reason why I said this is not to "dispute" the situation of "Yangkang" after eating four or five ibuprofen, but to emphasize that listening to "Yangkangs" sharing the "New Coronavirus Rehabilitation Diary" mainly depends on listening to the same in different places, rather than listening to the differences in different places. In other words, how much medicine to take is really not a key indicator, but lies in what medicine to take, how to take specific medicines, and even how to minimize the risk when returning to home isolation treatment. These are more important things.
Because until now, many people are still hoarding drugs and taking drugs indiscriminately, and under the objective situation of "difficulty in buying drugs". This emphasis is that as various places usher in "Yang Peaks", compared to macro-dissolving panic, what is more important now is to start from specific individuals and understand "Yang Zhu" and "Yang Kang" more correctly and rationally. In other words, in addition to listening, we need to understand the relationship between the new crown and ourselves.
So far, the topic has turned completely back, which is what we emphasized earlier. Listening to the "Yang Kangs" to share the "New Coronavirus Rehabilitation Diary" is to share the "New Coronavirus Rehabilitation Diary". After all, people are different. Even though there are commonalities based on the large-category genes of humans, each person is different after all.
So don’t ask, why are the same elderly and children, why are other people’s families okay after being infected with the new crown? Why are our families infected with the disease very serious? For this question, the answer when asked the first time is "people are different from others", and the answer when asked the second time is likely to be attributed to "destiny".
must admit that when looking at different destinies from a common standpoint, there is no absolute reason. So at this time, the best way is to face uncontrollable things and maintain maximum optimism while remaining cautious. In other words, the optimism, negativeness, and middleness of the "Yang Kangs" are not the most important. What is important is how to more objectively evaluate which "level" they belong to.
In addition, for the documentary reports of "Yang Kang", in addition to the "Yang Kang" that actively shared, we must also report the silent "Yang Kang". Only in this way can we better balance the optimistic and positive proportions and make the middle more valuable reference. Otherwise, it will be more or less objective to compete with "taking less medicine".
At the same time, we should also believe that with the emergence of "Yangkang" around most people, people's understanding of infection with the new crown will become clearer and clearer. Because compared to abstract sharing, specific experiences are more convincing. But no matter what, the dispute over "Pony Crossing the River" will always exist, but it was a paper battle before, and then a personal experience.
so the most important thing is not to completely eliminate the dispute, but how to face the dispute. That is, don’t tell everyone “You are infected, and it must be the same” just because your symptoms are severe, mild, or intermediate. Instead, I want to tell everyone, "I am like this, but now I'm recovering. If you do, you can try my method."
It is no exaggeration to say that even if the self-treatment method is different, it is not that because of the difference, you will often fall into a situation where "what you said is wrong or you are lying". From this we will examine the title "How many medicines can you recover from it?" I interviewed ten "Yang Kang" and the maximum consumption is three ibuprofen" documentary reports, perhaps the most important indicator is "the most important thing is reality."
