James won four championships, is it considered to dominate the NBA? Jordan really laughed!
If you insist on James' rule, the scope of is only in the east, not the whole league. Personally, I think that the data is good and the talent is out of order, but it really has not reached the level of dominance. The title of "Alliance First" is also 's comprehensive strength, honor, dominance, and influence . In this way, the ultimate goal of the NBA game is to win Jordan's two consecutive championships in the 1990s. There is nothing wrong with it. Looking back at the 10-20 decade of dominating the 90s, James's championship number is indeed inferior in terms of honor. The runner-up is not a shame, but it is inferior to the champion.
In history, there are only three people who can be called the era of dominance in the strict sense: George McCann, Bill Russell, Jordan, and the NBA during the McKenn Russell era has imperfect team-size league rules, so Jordan is. The only superstar in the era of dominance is the well-deserved GOAT. The evidence for this is simple. In the 1990s, Jordan had won 6 times during his 7 years in service. It must be said how dominance is.
Others, such as Kobe, in the first ten years of the 21st century, the sharks were not the Mamba in the finals of the first three championships, and in the following 7 years without sharks, they only won 2 championships. This dominance It cannot be called the era of domination. Duncan, don't talk about the winning rule in odd years. If he is dominant, then why did he go in even years?
's disappointment with Lao Zhan 1: In the first season of the Heat, the team was pure dual-core. Basically, it was impossible to see who was the master and who was the second tactically, but at that time Wade was still the soul of the team, and James had not really become that. The boss of the team, coupled with the psychological pressure brought about by the group, can only win but not lose for him, so we saw the lack of skills and ability of James at that time, and we also had the problem of backing Barea.
Disappointment 2: In the second season, Wade gave way and officially started playing with James as the core. The team played smoothly and James also developed more offensive methods. So successfully won the championship +FMVP. After watching the finals of this season, I reviewed the finals with the Mavericks next season. Suppose that James gives the offensive dominance to Wade, and he is at ease as the organizer, as the team's second offensive option to play his own way, will the result be a loss? I think the high probability is to win, but FMVP may be Wade. I don't want to say right or wrong about this.
Disappointment 3: After two consecutive losses to the Spurs, regrettably lost the opportunity to establish a dynasty. (Digression: Many people talk about the final win rate. I think losing to the Spurs is not wrong. The Spurs are very strong. The previous season had not been defeated by Ray Allen. It was not wrong that Youzhan lost the finals before. Entering the finals is already very powerful.) What I really can't understand is that James chose to return to the Cavaliers at this time and brought Love. I once again understand what this man's psychology is like.
An era refers to a decade. James's strength was the best in the league in the 10s. You can say that he is leading, but he will never dominate. After all, he won 4 championships and played two tie-breaks.
