is endless!
Another hit movie was accused of infringement or plagiarism.
Yes, it is " Changjin Lake " that is currently being shown.
is funny.
It seems that as long as it is a phenomenon-level movie, someone will come out and say plagiarism and infringement.
This time it is not plagiarism, it is a trademark infringement.
A director named Hao Ping posted on the Internet claiming that the title of "Changjin Lake" violated the legal trademarks of others.
This is not the most absurd.
director Hao Ping also said that if a lawsuit is filed, "Changjin Lake" will be removed from the shelves.
something similar happened to "Wolf Warrior 2" ,But that was before the movie was released.
Producer and starring Wu Jing was asked to pay 10 million yuan in compensation. As a result, the film was not postponed, and it broke the domestic box office record after it was released successfully.
Not to mention how far-fetched the allegations of trademark infringement are. Some netizens have found a "Changjin Lake" trademark for directors, script writing, film production, film distribution and screening, etc. Probably it was Hao Ping’s friend, but the registration date is July 2021.
and "Changjin Lake" The project was established in 2019 and will be completed in May 2021.
This war movie has long been anticipated by the industry. Are you sure that the trademark is not maliciously registered?
What is interesting is that Hao Ping also posted a work registration certificate and said that there was copyright infringement.
However, he only registered the outline of the story.
is an outline adapted from real history, saying that others have copied him. After that, will all the filming of Changjin Lake Battle get his permission?
This kind of thing that has been touched by porcelain has become a curse that is difficult to escape from domestically produced hit movies.
time forward.
5 billion hot spring festival " Hello Li Huanying ,I was told by a screenwriter that he had copied his own work.
2019 Spring Festival champion " wandering earth" _strong16 2span_strong16 _strong16 is plagiarized from Japanese movie "strongspan_strong16" _strong16 .
's summer blasts from 2017 to 2019 were all accused of plagiarism.
" I am not the god of medicine " Because the plot is similar to the American movie "Dallas Buyers Club" is said to be the same theme.
But in fact, the story of the two movies is very different.
and "I am not the god of medicine" is adapted from a real incident, with the permission of the parties, plagiarism is indeed a crime to be committed.
movie content is ok,But it was still plagiarized by propaganda posters.
After a number of promotional posters with a box office of over 100 million were alleged to be similar to Japanese comics, the film's official social platform responded positively and apologized.
" the richest man in Xihong City " won over 2.5 billion box office in 2018, ranking fourth in the box office of the year.
In 2019, a screenwriter named Wang Qian sued the court for copyright infringement "The richest man in Xihong City" plagiarism.
The first-instance verdict was that the plagiarism was unfounded, but the prosecution still refused to accept it and wanted to appeal.
In fact, "The Richest Man in Xihong City" is a remake of the movie, the copyright has been bought long ago.
The screenwriter said that the plot of a remake movie is similar to plagiarizing himself, and the original movie must be the same. Is it because he plagiarized first?
In the end, the original verdict was upheld in the second instance.
"The richest man in Xihong City" does not infringe.
and the judgment time was just before the start of the National Day stall. I did not expect that it was the turn of "Changjin Lake" was hit.
" Nezha's Demon Boy " was also accused of plagiarism in the "Five-Dimensional Memory" stage play.
The prosecution is hype in social media, and the popularity of "Nezha" has attracted a lot of attention.
is indeed not the case, many people do not know that there is such an "intangible cultural heritage creative show".
However, this kind of hype in exchange for more is just infamy.
The results of the first trial were announced in May this year.
No accidents.
Plagiarism is not valid.
This kind of touching porcelain has become more and more rampant, because the price paid may be far greater than the gain.
As long as you pay a legal fee, even if you lose the lawsuit, you can get a greater benefit than the equal publicity fee, as long as the prosecutor has enough thick skin.
Some people do not even need to sue, and they can slander and slander on the Internet, which can also attract a lot of attention.
If the filmmakers continue to tolerate this behavior, it is possible that this absurd "curse" will continue forever.
Sometimes it is better to take countermeasures, not to let the jumping clowns be too presumptuous.
.
