The United States wants to accuse other countries of strategic decisions, and the description is extremely confusing, indicating that Biden and have set a trap. Will we be fooled? At the critical moment, the experience of Putin is enough to bring us inspiration.
According to relevant media sources, recently, my country's announcement on "building a strong strategic deterrence system" has attracted the attention of many media, think tanks, military and politicians in the international community, and many people attribute it to my country's expansion of its nuclear arsenal. In fact, as early as earlier, Air Force Admiral Anthony Cotton, who is in charge of the nuclear arsenal and the missile defense system, believed that my country might have 1,000 nuclear warheads in the future.
To be honest, I believe everyone knows our country's nuclear strategy. We don't want to talk too much about the country's nuclear strategy here, but specifically want to talk about the US conspiracy.
Through this Russian-Ukrainian conflict, a controversial issue is whether the nuclear war will break out? Because since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, both the Russian side and NATO , especially the Russian side, have released nuclear threats more than once. However, the nuclear war has not yet broken out. All the matter is that all parties are well aware of the dangers of nuclear weapon , so they dare not use nuclear weapons at will.
And here shows a dilemma in Russia. Because in fact, in the past few years, Russia has used its extremely limited military expenditure every year to maintain and upgrade strategic nuclear forces, such as the "Sarmat" intercontinental ballistic missile, the "North Wind God-A" strategic nuclear submarine, the Tu-160M strategic bomber and other strategic strike forces, as well as the maintenance of existing nuclear warheads.
Russia's military expenditure is about 40 to 50 billion yuan per year. Using these aspects alone has consumed the main part of military expenditure. This directly leads to a sharp decline in Russia's conventional combat capabilities compared to the Soviet era. This is also the fundamental reason why the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has almost become a "squat and ruined war" until now.
So to a certain extent, we can say that Russian President Putin made a serious strategic mistake, because it was Putin who finalized Russia's establishment of the army, attached importance to the development of nuclear weapons, but stepped up the development of conventional combat capabilities. Because under the current international situation, nuclear weapons can only ensure their own safety, but cannot release sufficient strategic influence. NATO's strength does not lie in its nuclear arsenal, but in its strong conventional combat capabilities. The core of the United States' military hegemony is not nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are to deal with Russia, and the core of the military hegemony is the military base , which is spread all over the world.
Because nuclear weapons themselves are a weapon that increases the lower limit, this weapon can ensure local security, but in the current international situation, nuclear weapons are basically not suitable for achieving strategic goals to the outside world. So there is no doubt that the current nuclear weapons are not bad for big countries, but too many of them are a little useless.
Many people may think that if Putin does not do this, Russia's security will not be guaranteed. This perception is absolutely wrong. There is a very positive case in this regard, which is China, because in fact, China's military expenditure has only truly caught up with and surpassed Russia in the past decade. The collapse of the Soviet Union has been more than 30 years since . In other words, Russia has more than half of the time in the past 30 years, and its military expenditure is higher than China. But in fact, Russia's conventional combat capabilities are probably seriously lagging behind China in many aspects. You should know that Russia has inherited the Soviet Union's large military heritage. In terms of military industry and technology, the gap with the United States is very small. If Russia focuses on developing some conventional combat capabilities, then at this stage, Russia's military industry may not shrink so much. Russia will not fight so hard in this Russian-Ukrainian conflict. It is because Russia's nuclear arsenal has seriously overdrawn Russia's military expenditure.
This money can actually be saved. The excessive nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia are related to the Cold War nuclear competition. The Cold War has been over for thirty years, and such a large nuclear arsenal should have been reduced long ago.Over the past few years, the global nuclear disarmament of has been in full swing, and Russia can completely win over the United States to further reduce its nuclear warhead reserves.
So, Russia is actually surrounded by a pit. It is important to maintain the nuclear arsenal, but there is no need to maintain such a huge nuclear arsenal and strategic strike force. You should know that in fact, Russia is currently the country with the most comprehensive strategic strike force in the world. Even the United States is not as rich as Russia. The United States' land-based nuclear power is only "Ministry III" based on the missile silo , but there is no missile launch vehicle. Russia's strategic bomber and strategic nuclear submarine have very little power than the United States, but in terms of land-based, in addition to missile silos, there are also missile launchers. Such a rich nuclear arsenal as
does have great deterrence, but it can only ensure the security of Russia's locality. As for Russia's current nuclear strategic force, removing half of it, even cutting it with the United States in the past, and retaining only one-quarter of the existing one is enough. The extra money to develop conventional military forces is the right way.
Of course, the reason why Putin made such a mistake cannot be entirely blamed. A very important factor is that NATO and Russia are under too much pressure to implement. In other words, Putin has actually stepped into the trap of the United States and failed to first bring the United States into the United States to cut its nuclear arsenal together, and contribute to global nuclear disarmament, and also won a good reputation and other benefits. Instead, he fell into an embarrassing situation of guarding a large number of nuclear warheads that were ineffective in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
Now, US President Biden has dug a trap and is waiting for China to step on, trying to force China to spend a lot of money. In addition to maintaining the local area, it has very low practical nuclear strategic strike capabilities. Putin's revelation is also worthy of our attention. Although the upgrade of the nuclear arsenal is important, it must not be abandoned due to choking, which affects the upgrading of conventional combat capabilities.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-