In recent times, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has become increasingly serious, and it may even evolve into a "declaration of war" at any time. This situation occurs on the one hand because Ukraine planned to attack Crimea Bridge . On the other hand, it is naturally because the offensive tactics have changed again after the Russian army had the commander-in-chief of the Special Operations against Ukraine.
Of course, it has a lot to do with Western countries constantly fanning the flames behind their backs. At least it will make Ukraine mistakenly believe that it is strong enough to kill Russia at any time. However, after the four state referendum ended, Russia directly issued a call for the newly joined territory, and also had the right to use all weapons to launch a counterattack, including all weapons, including nuclear weapon . As soon as this statement was made, Western countries could not sit still. After all, the reason why the West has been very afraid of Russia for many years is because the country has nuclear weapons.
Faced with this situation, recently, Borrelli, the senior representative of the EU diplomatic and security policy, claimed that if Russia uses nuclear weapons against Ukraine, then Western countries will wipe out the Russian army on the front line.
What surprised the EU was that this warning was once again ignored by Russia. Medvedev responded quickly, believing that this statement was completely "dreamy" of the EU. After all, in Medvedev's view, according to NATO , if Russia really launches nuclear strike against Ukraine, then NATO or Europe will attack Russia, and Russia will also use nuclear weapons against NATO. In the end, the West will fall into a vicious cycle, and it can even be said that it will put Europe in the risk of nuclear radiation .
In other words, the EU has not understood this statement at all. If there are mushroom bombs thrown in the future, can Western countries take corresponding risks? It can also be said that at this time, the EU still dares to provoke Russia. Do you really need to log wood to keep warm or burn coal to keep warm in winter? What's more, the reason why the Russian-Ukraine conflict is becoming more and more intense is closely related to the fact that Western countries are raising fire and "handing over the knife".
It can also be said that the United States planned the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and only spent 66 billion US dollars to exchange for a Ukraine that will last forever with Russia. Now that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is becoming more and more intense, the EU dares to provoke Russia and even threatens to wipe out the Russian army on the front line. Let me ask, if NATO really has the courage to fight head-on with Russia, why have they only dared to use eastward expansion or sanctions to deal with Russia for many years?
Even before the outbreak of the Russian-Ukraine conflict, NATO swore to fight Russia with Ukraine. Why did NATO countries express their positions after the conflict broke out and would not intervene in the conflict? To put it bluntly, NATO's fear of Russia is deeply rooted.
It can even be said that the reason why NATO continues to inflict behind the scenes is ultimately hope to achieve the goal of weakening Russia through the hands of Ukraine. In other words, NATO does not dare to challenge Russia directly, but NATO can warn Russia or challenge Russia. The purpose is naturally to let Russia and Ukraine fight and avoid the situation where it ends in a short period of time. In this regard, NATO is indeed "wolf ambition".
(text/Huaqiang)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-