The Art of War says: A soldier who subdues others without fighting is a good person. Most people's understanding of this sentence is that it is not necessary to engage in direct war, but to use other non-military means to achieve the ultimate strategic goal, so that the opponent'

2024/05/2013:26:32 military 1003

The Art of War says: A soldier who subdues others without fighting is a good person. Most people's understanding of this sentence is that it is not necessary to engage in direct war, but to use other non-military means to achieve the ultimate strategic goal, so that the opponent' - DayDayNews

The Art of War says: A soldier who subdues others without fighting is a good person. Most people's understanding of this sentence is that it is not necessary to engage in direct war, but to use other non-military means to achieve the ultimate strategic goal, so that the opponent's military strength can be fully weakened or even lead to a collapse outcome. the best. The outcome of the Cold War was the total collapse and disintegration of the former Soviet Union. As a result, the overall national power of its successors, including military strength, could no longer be fully on par with the superpowers. It can be regarded as the most typical historical case of subduing the enemy without fighting. However, if you think that winning without fighting does not necessarily require "combat", then in the face of today's and future next-generation combat technologies, it is obvious that some ways of thinking are lagging behind reality. If this is not easy to understand, you can explain it in another sentence. This is the new concept weapon of the next generation of . It is so advanced that it can completely reduce the dimensionality of ordinary small and medium-sized countries in an instant. The other party may be completely disarmed before they realize what is happening.

The Art of War says: A soldier who subdues others without fighting is a good person. Most people's understanding of this sentence is that it is not necessary to engage in direct war, but to use other non-military means to achieve the ultimate strategic goal, so that the opponent' - DayDayNews

And even among major powers, if they are no longer at the top level in the world in terms of such advanced weapon systems, they will also face a situation where the opponent has already seen through their cards in advance as soon as the war begins. If they continue to fight, they will inevitably fail. . To give a very realistic example: In today's global strategic landscape, the basic international order still relies on the mutual strategic balance of intercontinental nuclear weapons. Because even two or three global powers cannot guarantee the interception of hundreds of intercontinental missiles and thousands of nuclear warheads launched by their opponents during wartime. This balance, in which neither party can completely defend the other, has been maintained for more than half a century, and may be maintained for another twenty or thirty years. But if a certain party today suddenly masters a brand new super weapon system. For example, a high-energy strategic laser that can instantly fire hundreds of thousands of high-intensity pulses, or a super pulse bomb that can smoke out all electrical and electromagnetic components within a million square kilometers with one shot. Well, in the past, the global strategic balance formed by relying on everyone,

The Art of War says: A soldier who subdues others without fighting is a good person. Most people's understanding of this sentence is that it is not necessary to engage in direct war, but to use other non-military means to achieve the ultimate strategic goal, so that the opponent' - DayDayNews

could not completely defend against the rain of intercontinental missiles, and it was eventually broken. And these super new concept weapons with unparalleled performance may not need to be put into actual combat another twenty or thirty years from now, but can form complete combat capabilities within five years. So whichever global power is the first to achieve this technological capability will achieve absolute military leadership in the world and be able to command the world. This is no longer a strategic illusion, but is most likely part of the emerging military reality. After all, the breakthrough of nuclear weapon has a history of nearly 80 years; as a staged ultimate weapon, it is already extraordinary to have existed for a century. From now on, there will inevitably be epoch-making weapon systems that will fully upgrade human combat methods; the importance of nuclear weapons will naturally decline simultaneously, and eventually intercontinental missiles and medium- and long-range missiles will be almost 100% intercepted, completely losing their historical status. . This can be regarded as a brand-new weapon for mankind to enter the next stage of development and conquer without fighting.

The Art of War says: A soldier who subdues others without fighting is a good person. Most people's understanding of this sentence is that it is not necessary to engage in direct war, but to use other non-military means to achieve the ultimate strategic goal, so that the opponent' - DayDayNews

Among all promising new concept super weapon systems, the super powerful electromagnetic pulse weapon, also known as EMP, is the number one killer with more development prospects than the super strategic laser. This is because EMP itself is almost harmless to humans. But it can instantly destroy all the enemy's military capabilities. Because any large-scale weapon today, regardless of sea, land, air or space, must have a power supply and microelectronics system inside, and they are all targets of instant destruction by super EMP. If a super EMP bomb falls and all the opponent's circuits fail within a radius of 500 kilometers, then the outcome of this war will be decided in an instant. There may not be any casualties among the opponent's personnel, but they have to raise the white flag in the face of reality.The question is, when the super EMP bomb is dropped, while killing the opponent's electromagnetic equipment, will it also simultaneously kill our own equipment exposed in the war zone? Therefore, the main premise for using super EMP bombs in actual combat is: our side must have complete defense capabilities against all super EMP bombs!

The Art of War says: A soldier who subdues others without fighting is a good person. Most people's understanding of this sentence is that it is not necessary to engage in direct war, but to use other non-military means to achieve the ultimate strategic goal, so that the opponent' - DayDayNews

A major country has just announced that its own EMP super electromagnetic pulse defense system has passed the acceptance test! So the subtext is naturally: This company not only has an EMP super defense system, but it must also have super EMP ammunition. Otherwise, how would it pass the acceptance test? Now that the defense has passed, there will be no obstacle to using super EMP bombs in actual combat in the future! As for why the development of EMP technology is so far ahead, legend has it that it is related to a conversation between the two major countries' technical masters more than 20 years ago. This is why the "masters" of the superpowers took the initiative to ask: How do you think the EMP bomb can completely break through? Respondent: Have you heard the story of the crow drinking water? Superpower Expert: This story is well known to us in the West. So how did the crow drink from the bottle? Of course, the crow found a lot of small stones and took them into the half-empty bottle. But what if there are no pebbles near the bottle? The crow can fly and can go to the river to find pebbles. The conversation between the two ended like this! It took 20 years for the superpower's EMP experts to have a flash of inspiration: By the river!

military Category Latest News