Less than a month after the epidemic was released, countries around the world began to "block" Chinese people!
After the country’s precise control, Chinese people have been well protected for three years. However, in the eyes of foreigners, our arrival inspection, isolation and other measures have caused a lot of inconvenience to them. They have been calling for the cancellation of corresponding control measures on the grounds that their own countries have completely liberalized the situation.
However, when we let go, a "nonsensical" scene emerged. When the Internet was flooded with all kinds of "Xiaoyang people" information, the messages from the international community were even more eye-catching. China is the best country in prevention and control, but now Chinese people are "blocked" by countries around the world!
Morocco prohibits the entry of Chinese people. The United States, Europe, Japan and South Korea and other countries have implemented "arrival inspections" one after another. Once they are found to be "Xiao Yang", they need to be forced to "quarantine for 7 days". Is this reasonable? Are Chinese people being deliberately targeted?
Chinese people are starting to be "targeted"?
When the virus was first discovered, countries around the world blocked flights from China and did not allow Chinese people to enter. However, when we tightened the control, they had objections again and continued to criticize the behavior of "closed doors and thanking guests" and called for following the pace of international liberalization. However, when the country was completely liberalized, these countries began to check the nucleic acid of Chinese people.
After the domestic entry and exit controls were relaxed, the sales of international air tickets doubled, which had been suppressed for three years. The demand of Chinese people to go abroad showed a surge. There were many people studying, working, and visiting relatives. However, the joy only lasted a few days, and the news from overseas made them overjoyed.
Japan, South Korea, Italy, and India took the lead in issuing entry regulations for Chinese tourists. In addition to nucleic acid tests, there are also seven-day quarantine requirements. Foreign media Reuters even spread the news: "We are worried and questioning about the surge in cases of COVID-19 in China and the transparency of reporting virus transmission data. !" Soon the United States stated: "It is considering strengthening restrictions on Chinese tourists!"
Now such news is constantly "fermenting", and many countries have gradually started to follow up on the control measures in line with the concept of "better than indiscriminate". Later, the news that "countries around the world resumed nucleic acid testing of Chinese tourists" became a hot topic. Many people regarded this as a deliberate attempt to make things difficult, and our three years of efforts seemed to have been completely ignored.
In the past three years, due to problems such as scarcity of flights and high ticket prices, many international students and overseas staff have not been home for many years, and are looking forward to the complete relaxation of the epidemic. However, China's humane liberalization of entry and exit management has been undermined by other countries around the world. This is really difficult to accept at this time.
Since December 30, Japan has begun to strictly implement control measures for Chinese immigrants. As long as there is a problem with the nucleic acid, it must implement 7-day control. Later, India also followed a similar approach, but it targeted all Asian countries. South Korea and Italy also followed up at about the same time. Morocco went even more exaggerated and restricted the entry of all Chinese.
Various countries originally expected China to liberalize. After all, the spending power of Chinese tourists is unmatched by any country. However, due to the rapid spread of the virus, countries have begun to be afraid. This is completely contrary to the previous "seeking liberalization". So, can China be targeted? Is
deliberately targeted?
China was able to make up its mind to open up, obviously because it conducted a comprehensive assessment of the virus, and only after confirming that it would not cause too much harm to the infected, did it dare to make the decision to open up. As experts said: "There will always be times when the virus cannot be transmitted!" But it will obviously take a long time to achieve this result.
To say that it was deliberately targeted by countries around the world, it is actually a bit far-fetched to explain. During the three years of control, many countries relaxed the control in the later period, but we still adopt strict control measures for immigrants from these countries. Although these countries are superficially reluctant, they still do it.
Therefore, the control measures against the virus have two sides. They cannot be purely based on their own point of view, and they cannot be compared with our control of inbound personnel. The purpose is to avoid being affected by the corresponding effects. Now they are strengthening prevention and control, naturally because of such factors.
But the difference is that many countries have relaxed control before, but suddenly began to restrict the entry of Chinese people. In fact, this is related to some "careful people". Similar to the news distributed by Reuters, it gives people the impression that we only relaxed the situation because we could not control it. The toxicity of the virus has also been exaggerated. Naturally, some countries are afraid and have to follow up with corresponding measures.
If analyzed purely from these perspectives, their behavior is understandable, but what is chilling is that we have endured huge epidemic prevention pressure for three years and achieved dynamic clearing many times. However, the current situation is obviously due to the ineffective prevention and control overseas.
Nowadays, China's technological development and trade exchanges no longer allow the "blocking of the country" as in the past. Therefore, we are the most innocent victims. This is just one extreme. Going to the other extreme, this "disaster" for all mankind will eventually pass. What do you think of this?