The Russian National Counter-Terrorism Commission claimed that a truck explosion caused the incident and ignited the train on the railway bridge. However, many military bloggers believed that it was the Ukrainian intelligence department, and the debate was nothing more than a car

The Crimea Bridge explodes!

From the videos and pictures that have been spread across the Internet, after the explosion of Crimea Bridge, two bridge decks on one side of the highway bridge were destroyed and fell into the sea. A oil tanker on the railway bridge burned and caught fire. It was suspected that two bridge piers were destroyed and could not be repaired in a short period of time. Local media in Crimea claimed that although the Russian Ministry of Transport and the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situation are operating on site, the fire on the railway bridge has not been extinguished, and the Crimea Bridge has been banned at present.

The so-called " Crimea Republic " government declared that although the bridge is banned, the local food and fuel reserves are sufficient, the ferry has begun to operate, and the reserve plan for all emergencies has been formulated and completed. However, the hearts of Crimea do not seem to be pacified. Russian netizens are scolding Russian Federal Security Bureau (FSB) and other departments, claiming that they were deceived to Crimea, but ended up in a war zone.

Russian National Counter-Terrorism Commission claims that a truck explosion caused the incident and ignited the train on the railway bridge. However, many military bloggers believe that it was done by Ukrainian intelligence agencies. The debate is nothing more than a car bomb or an underwater blast. Analysts believe that the former is unlikely. When vehicles enter the Crimea Bridge, they need to undergo X-ray inspections and other inspections, and it is difficult to carry bombs. Moreover, car bombs are uncertain that they can blow up the bridge. If the car explodes, If this effect can be achieved, the bridge that took three years and cost $3.7 billion is too bad;

The latter is more likely. Due to the incompressibility of water, underwater blasting can maximize the energy of explosives on the bridge piers. Ukrainian Navy special forces are likely to participate and use equipment similar to suicide bombers. According to public reports, the West has not provided similar equipment to Ukraine, but it is not difficult to obtain. Even the Houthi armed forces in Yemen have this type of equipment.

Compared with the Antonov Bridge, which was constantly bombarded by the Ukrainian "Haimas" rocket launcher, the Crimea Bridge appears quite fragile. The Crimea Bridge is more than 250 kilometers away from the front line. The Russian army also deployed angle launchers and air defense system protection nearby, but it was still blown up by one blow. In contrast, the Antonov Bridge was hit by dozens of rockets fired by the " Himas ". The 90-kilogram semi-armor-piercing warhead can only blow holes on the bridge deck, and it can still drive with steel plates (heavy-load vehicles and tanks , etc. are definitely not good), let alone leaving.

Crimea Bridge is the most important bridge in the world. It not only connects Crimea with Russia, but more importantly, it actually blocks Azov Sea , and specializes in the four Russians using the traditional skills of blocking related waters with bridges. The Russian government has long issued a warning to the bridge that if Ukraine attacks the Crimean Bridge, the Russian government will take severe revenge.

So, the question is, how the Crimean Bridge was blown up, and whether the Ukrainian army destroyed the Crimean Bridge, it doesn’t matter. What’s important is whether the Russian government announced that the Crimean Bridge was blown up by the Ukrainian side. If it is not announced, it will be like the series of explosions and fires in Crimea, which are caused by "cigarette butts" and have nothing to do with Ukraine. If it is announced that Ukraine has blown up the Crimean Bridge, Russia will definitely take revenge. How to retaliate against

? "Long-range precision strike" is obviously not possible. Since the outbreak of the war, the Russian army has been continuously carrying out "Long-range precision strike" in Ukraine, but the effect is very poor. So far, Ukraine has been exporting electricity to Europe (many people don't believe it, right?). Considering the current situation, there is only one option left: use nuclear weapon .

Foreign media claimed that on the day of his birthday, Russian President Putin has decided to use nuclear weapons. The next question is time and place, whether to use tactical nuclear weapons or something else. Foreign media claimed that the current situation is more tense than the " Cuban missile crisis " in 1962, and former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and others are constantly calling on Western countries to pay attention to Russia's nuclear threat.

: At this point, it doesn’t matter who bombed the Crimean Bridge. As long as the Russian government announces that it was bombed by the Ukrainian army, there is a reason to use nuclear weapons. As for the consequences of using nuclear weapons, it is not something we can predict.

Crimea Bridge was bombed, the key is to see how the Kremlin expresses its position.