Zelensky wants Ukraine to enter the NATO organization, which is not a day or two. Zelensky made a lot of efforts to do this.
Perhaps it was Zelensky's efforts that allowed the US-led NATO to see sincerity. Not only did the US continue to provide military assistance to Ukraine after the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, but other NATO member states are also doing similar things to the United States. The only difference between these member states is probably the extent of military assistance to Ukraine.
With the assistance of the United States and other NATO member states and many European countries, Zelensky also recently submitted an application to join NATO "quickly".
If Zelensky's application is passed, it will be equivalent to a complete "breaking up" between NATO and Russia, and directly standing on the opposite side of Russia and Putin declared war. Therefore, in response to Zelensky's request, NATO politely declined Zelensky on the grounds that "all member states must agree."
The White House responded: NATO pursues an open policy, but now is not the right time to consider getting Ukraine to join.
In this regard, some analysts believe that this is the US government pouring "cold water" on Zelensky, directly breaking Ukraine's dream of joining NATO. Because as far as NATO is concerned, the United States is the country that dominates this organization. Even if other member states do not agree to Ukraine joining NATO, the US government will find ways to get Ukraine into NATO as long as the US side is willing.
But is the US government really so "ruthless" to Ukraine? Actually, it is not the case.
From before the outbreak of the Russian-Ukraine war to the present, the US government has been running for the war, and has also tried its best to persuade other countries to support Ukraine in order to "maintain peace."
For the purpose of the US, we believe more that the US is doing this for NATO and the US itself. That is, to expand NATO's influence in the international community and to allow NATO member states to spread across more areas on the earth, and aiding Ukraine has become a good reason to help NATO expand.
Review the response of the White House to Ukraine again, and these words are particularly "ambiguous". White House did not say that Ukraine was not qualified to join NATO. It was not because of the criticism of Ukraine, but because it was based on NATO itself, believing that now is not the "right time" to get Ukraine to join. If you want to say that this statement is ambiguous, it is ambiguous in the expression "correct time".
In other words, the White House believes that if the time comes, Ukraine will be included in the ranks of countries that NATO is considering allowing it to join. The White House seemed to be rejecting Zelensky, but in fact, it was asking Zelensky to wait. What are you waiting for in
? Wait for the right time to get Ukraine to complete the last step before entering NATO.
Russia has long been dissatisfied with the act of NATO member states to transport weapons to Ukraine, and has also made it clear that NATO provides military assistance to Ukraine is declaring war on Russia.
However, NATO continues to aid Ukraine while avoiding Russia's warnings. This is enough to show that NATO or the United States has not given up confronting Russia through this war, but the United States has chosen the way to stand behind Ukraine.
However, it is a fact that Russia has nuclear weapon . Even if NATO tries to promote the development of the war, it is unwilling to confront Russia head-on. This is the reason why the United States' attitude towards Zelensky's "fast" request for admission to the contract is ambiguous. It is not harmful to NATO to have one more member state, but it is not the right time.
Therefore, Zelensky's NATO dream was not broken because of NATO's polite rejection. He needs to wait for an opportunity to complete the last step before entering NATO, and this opportunity is the end of the Russian-Ukrainian war.
Only when the Russian-Ukraine war is over and everything returns to peace, will NATO open the door and make Ukraine a member state when Russia will not use nuclear weapons because of NATO's acceptance of Ukraine.
After all, NATO does not intend to completely break up with Russia now.Because if this is done, the nuclear war may be inevitable, and NATO will be forced to devote itself to this war, and the consequences will be unpredictable.
So, if Zelensky wants to realize his dream, he has to take this last step, but this step is also the most difficult to take.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-