According to Observer Network, recently, when Biden took to the stage to deliver a speech, he mentioned China unexpectedly after accusing Russia.

According to " Observer Network ", recently, at the 77th United Nations General Assembly , when Biden came to the stage to deliver a speech, he mentioned China unexpectedly after accusing Russia. In his speech, Biden said that the United States does not seek conflict with China and the Cold War with China, nor will it require other countries to take sides.

In response to this, China responded to four words - "Implement to implementation", My Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said that he hopes the United States can implement President Biden's statement and work with China to seek a peaceful and win-win path for Sino-US relations.

When Biden first appeared on the UN General Assembly podium in 2021, he actually made the same speech. At that time, Biden emphasized that the United States will not seek to create a "new Cold War". However, the fact is that the actual practices of the United States are very different from Biden's statement.

Former US President During the reign of Trump, he imposed unreasonable tariffs of up to 25% on Chinese goods. At that time, the outside world generally believed that this was the United States that took the initiative to start a "trade dispute" with China. After that, Biden, who claimed to "not seeking a Cold War", took office, still roughly continued this strategy.

In fact, the United States is setting up trade barriers for economic cooperation between China and the United States. In addition to curbing China in economic development, the United States also frequently clamors to "reduce economic dependence on China" in the ears of allies, which has led to the continuous fermentation of the "decoupling theory from China" in recent times under the hype of many Western media.

is not only the economy, but also in the field of science and technology, the United States also fully demonstrates its " hegemony ". So far, the United States has blocked more than 600 Chinese entities, most of which are related to technology industries such as information technology and aerospace. In addition, the United States has repeatedly blocked China in the field of semiconductor , and has repeatedly pressured relevant companies to prohibit cooperation with relevant Chinese companies.

The United States has repeatedly labeled itself as "fair competition", but again and again under the banner of "national security" to curb the development of Chinese enterprises. To put it bluntly, the United States is integrating the development of technology into the political color, and then using it to suppress the development of China's technology.

It can be seen that the United States is shouting "Don't seek a new Cold War", but in fact it always holds the banner of "technology hegemony". Some politicians even publicly stated that China must not surpass the United States in the field of high-end technology. It can be seen that in order to ensure its dominant position in the field of science and technology, the United States has been willing to break the rules of fair competition and implement "America first" to the end based on its own political goals.

Even though multiple suppression of China has been implemented in the two important areas of economy and technology, this still has not "satisfied" the United States. NATO is a product left over from the Cold War, but has been preserved to this day since the end of the Cold War. As NATO's largest "trader", the United States has repeatedly attempted to use NATO to exclude China from the international community.

In the document released by NATO this year, it openly stated that China poses a so-called "systemic threat" to NATO. In addition, it is generally believed that the United States wants to establish another "New NATO" in the Asia-Pacific region, and its purpose is to create a new "Containment Front" in the region.

In addition, some time ago, the United States personally created a so-called " Indo-Pacific Economic Framework ", which is called "establishing a free and open Indo-Pacific", but in fact, it is to hedge against China in the economic field.

To put it bluntly, the United States actually wants to use this to weaken China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region. It is worth mentioning that the cooperation between the United States and the United Kingdom and Australia's nuclear submarine is still continuing, which further aggravates the tension in the regional situation and provokes the risk of an arms race.

In fact, to put it bluntly, these actions of the United States are actually trying to compete with China in geopolitical terms.It can be seen from the establishment of "anti-Chinese small circles" around the world that the United States wants to squeeze China out of the international stage. For this reason, the United States has repeatedly used "democracy, human rights" and other tools for its manipulation of politics, and firmly regards China as a "threat."

It is not difficult to see that in terms of China, the thinking of most American politicians still stays in the 20th century, holding on to Cold War thinking , trying to repeat the Cold War. But to this day, the whole world should understand that peace and development are the mainstream of the times, and this behavior of the United States will only further aggravate the turmoil of the global situation.

It is worth noting that before Biden promised to "not seek to create a Cold War with China", the foreign ministers of China and Russia had just held a face-to-face talks. In addition, the two sides also reached a consensus on opposing power politics and opposing unilateralism. This also shows the common position of China and Russia to fight against hegemony and oppose Cold War thinking in future global development.

Now the international situation is undergoing major changes unseen in a century, and the world is facing severe challenges. However, the United States is still frequently exaggerating the so-called "China threat theory" in an attempt to re-engage in the old business of the "Cold War".

From the common interests of all countries in the world, the United States must stop its policy toward China and change its course. Only by abandoning the Cold War thinking and the thinking of zero-sum game can China and the United States avoid sliding towards a "new Cold War" and thus ensuring the stable development of the world.