"Does the United States dominate the China-Canada hostage exchange?" Biden was criticized and turned his head to focus on Russia?

Article丨Wen Dao Tu Ear Trial丨Lemon is not cute

From Meng Wanzhou was illegally arrested by Canada to Meng Wanzhou was acquitted and released back to China, in these 1028 days, the Chinese government and Huawei company never Abandoning the rescue of Ms. Meng, and with the joint efforts of many parties, Meng Wanzhou finally lifted his imprisonment in his innocence and arrived at Shenzhen Airport on September 25 by special plane. This time Meng Wanzhou's return to China not only represents Huawei's complete victory in this extradition case, but also means that China has defeated the other side with justice in the confrontation with the US and Western hegemony.

The US government has been criticized by public opinion

So after Ms. Meng successfully returned to China, the whole country cheered and celebrated this hard-won victory. It's just that some people are happy and some are worried. The United States on the other side of the ocean does not seem to be so relaxed and happy. Because in the Meng Wanzhou extradition case, the United States ended in failure, losing the initiative and making concessions to China, so Biden, as the leader, naturally had to bear the attack of public opinion.

At a press conference held at the White House on September 27, a reporter asked: Has the White House joined the "exchange" between China and Canada? In this regard, the White House spokesperson quickly denied this statement and clarified that this was an independent decision made by the Ministry of Justice. He also emphasized that the White House has nothing to do with the progress of the Meng Wanzhou case. Although the White House has been trying to justify its involvement in the Meng Wanzhou case, it is nothing more than not wanting to bear the charge of interfering with judicial independence, but after the United States has revealed various flaws, such accusations will not be absent because of the White House's sophistry.

US hegemony has not changed

Analysts pointed out that as early as the Trump administration, he had stated that he believed that the government could intervene conditionally in this case, plus the fact that the United States was not far away. Jurisdiction was manually used, and domestic laws were used as international standards to pressure Canada to coordinate the arrest of Meng Wanzhou. Therefore, in this case, in addition to Canada's improper operation, the United States cannot escape its blame. This is itself a vicious incident of interfering with judicial independence through administrative power and maliciously and illegally detaining Chinese citizens.

During this period, the United States and Canada often compared the case of Meng Wanzhou with China’s arrest of Canadian criminals Kang Mingkai and Michael.Although they were both arrested in other countries, there is a fundamental difference between the two incidents. The Canadian criminals Kang Mingkai and Michael's attempts to endanger China's national security are well documented, so whether it is the two criminals who have repeatedly denied it or the United States. The two governments of Canada helped to defend it, and neither of them could change the facts.

However, Meng Wanzhou was detained by the United States and Canada for no reason. This case is a political incident jointly created by the United States and Canada. Now with Meng Wanzhou’s successful return to China, the United States is still able to change its habit of extending its arms to interfere in other countries and impose sanctions on other countries, and is now arresting Gazprom executives. This also means that the United States’ hegemonic behavior has not yet converged and the world Countries still need to be vigilant.

(Copyright statement: this article is created by the original, the picture is from the network, if there is any infringement, please contact to inform, some sources of information: China News Network, National Defense Times)

.