For a long time, "I would rather let the people of the world take me, and let the people of the world take me" is a typical feature of American hegemony. In the matter of snatching French weapons orders and partnering with Britain and Australia to target France, the United States has shown the words "only for profit, and allies side by side".
However, more and more signs have shown that with "peace and development" becoming a world trend, the hegemonism that the United States is proud of has become increasingly impractical.
This time, what the US did has caused strong dissatisfaction from Germany, the European Union and India.
On September 22, there are at least two things worth noting.
First thing, Macron called Modi, India chose to support France. As early as after the fallout between France and the United States, Britain and Australia, India became the target of competition between Britain and France.
Why?
Because India, which has “stupid people and a lot of money”, is planning to cooperate with other countries to develop the engine of the fifth-generation fighter. In the beginning, India wanted to obtain the core technology of the French Rafale fighter, but the British told India that it was willing The engine is developed and produced locally in India, and India can participate in this process.
This means that in order to grab French orders, the United Kingdom intends to provide more commitments to India.
The problem is that India does not believe in the United States and Britain.
Macron and Modi emphasized that next, the two countries will launch "joint operations" in the Indo-Pacific region. France promised that France can help India strengthen its strategic autonomy in the fields of industry and military.
is the most meaningful, is the French phrase "against any form of hegemonism, France and India will work together to maintain stability in the Indo-Pacific region". Modi said in the statement that Macron is his good friend and emphasized that India is eager to strengthen cooperation with France.
France and India agree that the international order should be multilateral rather than unilateral, and hegemonism will not work after all.
Fa-printed each other,There are at least 3 signals.
1, for the United States, Britain and India, it is indeed enough. Over the years, the United Kingdom and the United States, which claim to be "human rights defenders," have to interfere in India's internal affairs every so often, and have even repeatedly issued strong signals that "If New Delhi is not obedient, India will be sanctioned."
There is no harm without comparison. France, Germany and the EU are much better for India. In that case, why does India support the United States and Britain?
2. India has a deep understanding of the true face of the United States and Britain, and Modi does not want to choose a side station. At the beginning, Biden left India with a choice of "pro-US or pro-Russian." Now that it is good, the United States and the European Union have fallen out, and India does not have to choose between the United States, Europe and Russia.
In other words, the escalation of the conflict between the United States and Europe is in the interests of India. Of course, Modi will not help the United States, Britain and Australia deal with the European Union.
3. India is very worried about becoming the next France. In the style that the United States has never reconciled to a loss and the White House turns its face at every turn, one day, India will be betrayed by the United States. What will happen then?
In short, Modi maintains friendly exchanges with France, which can provide India with an extra retreat. After the US-India fallout, India can at least turn to France, Germany and the EU.
It can be seen that Modi is indeed very good at vertical and horizontal communication.
The second thing is that Biden publicly "humiliated" Johnson . On September 21, the French Foreign Minister denounced the United States at the United Nations General Assembly for "only profiting, disregarding the interests of allies, and stabbing France in the back." The White House, not to be outdone, chose to cancel the "U.S., Britain, France and Germany" talks.
However, Biden and Johnson held a unilateral meeting, and Macron and Merkel are both in the European Union.
But at this moment, an "unbelievable" scene happened.
During the meeting with Johnson,For some unknown reason, the White House personnel suddenly interrupted Johnson's speech, and then the scene fell into chaos.
Soon, there was news from the United States that "Biden and Johnson had divergence" and "the United States was unwilling to reach a free trade agreement with the United Kingdom."
As for "why did the White House personnel cut off Johnson's speech", it is still unknown at present. Some people think that Biden may have a problem at that time.
But no matter what, Johnson traveled all the way to the United States without hesitation. Whether he abides by diplomatic etiquette or demonstrates American demeanor as a great power, Biden should not let White House personnel interrupt Johnson's speech, because this is equivalent to publicity." Humiliation" Johnson.
In any case, Johnson is the British Prime Minister, but he was treated like this in the United States, his closest ally. How can he not let the British people and American allies disappointed?
Prior to this, directly called Morrison "that guy in Australia" because Biden didn't remember the name Morrison . The Australian people also denounced the United States as "self-righteous".
Don’t forget that France, Germany, the EU are competing with the United States, Macron Merkel is suffocated, Biden at this time let Johnson lose face, does not tell the world: the United States never cares about the feelings of allies, including Britain and Australia ?
The moment the world situation changes is indeed incredible. Biden's foreign strategy is still constantly changing.
Let's see how the US moves next.
.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-