For a long time, Western countries have been illegally imported into Chinese waters under the name of so-called "free navigation". The Chinese side has repeatedly negotiated and expressed opposition, but the United States and other countries have acted in a superior manner, claiming that free navigation conforms to international law. On September 12, the website of the US Department of Defense published a news that three Chinese warships appeared in the Aleutian Islands US exclusive economic zone, and also released photos of the scene. But after a few hours, the US Department of Defense immediately deleted these photos.
According to US media, these pictures were taken on August 30 by the US Coast Guard "Bosov" destroyer. A total of three Chinese ships can be found in the pictures. The warships, are the 055 destroyer, the 052D destroyer and a supply ship. However, these photos were deleted a few hours after they were sent, and the United States has not given a clear reason for deletion.
However, the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force notified as early as August 22 that three Chinese warships were discovered in the waters about 105 kilometers southwest of Falkland Islands. Among its ships are the Type 055 destroyer Nanchang, the 052D destroyer Guiyang and A large supply ship, these three warships are heading northeast.
The deletion of these photos by the US Department of Defense is like hiding their ears, hoping that these things have not happened. After all, it has always been the United States leading the Western countries to shout "free navigation" slogans and unscrupulously around the world. Now that Chinese warships appear in the US exclusive economic zone, they are also following the so-called "freedom of navigation" in the West. If they refute it, then Isn't it trying to save face, and there is no reason for the United States to engage in the so-called "freedom of navigation" in the South China Sea in the future.
And on September 8, the US guided-missile destroyer "Benford" was not approved by China.Illegal intruded into the waters adjacent to the Mischief Reef in Nansha, China. The southern theater of the Chinese People's Liberation Army organized forces to track and monitor them and warn them to leave. After the incident, US Seventh Fleet issued a statement stating that the warship’s actions in the Spratly Islands complied with international law and blamed China for its meddling.
Subsequently, the Seventh Fleet issued a statement stating that the United States will continue to fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows, just as the "Benford" did. The Seventh Fleet also threatened: "China cannot stop our actions."
On the same day, the U.S. Navy Information Director and China Global Times editor-in-chief Hu Xijin launched a series of confrontations on the issue of free navigation. The U.S. Navy Information Director tried to make freedom of navigation "reasonable" on social media. Hu Xijin retorted: I hope that when Chinese warships cross , the Caribbean Sea or appear near Hawaii and Guam, the United States can continue to insist on the same "navigation." Free” standard. Hu also specially emphasized that this day will come soon.
Although the three Chinese warships only arrived at the Aleutian Islands this time, it was also a good start. Recently, the British aircraft carrier battle group was deployed in Asia, and Germany sent a destroyer. Western countries wanted to expand their influence in the Asia-Pacific region and tried to intimidate China. Although the British side took the initiative to call China to avoid conflicts, it actually hurt China's legitimate interests. Therefore, it is reasonable that the Chinese warship appeared in the US Exclusive Economic Zone to return the other way.
China has always emphasized that the so-called freedom of navigation is a false proposition. The actions of US warships will only exacerbate the turbulence and threats in the region. The stability of the South China Sea depends on the joint efforts of neighboring countries, and the United States is one Countries outside the region should not be mixed.
Some people might say,Since it opposes the freedom of navigation in the United States, why should China do the same? China has repeatedly emphasized that it requires Western countries, headed by the United States, to stop the so-called freedom of navigation tricks, but these countries turn a deaf ear to their own way. Since the U.S. and others are unreasonable, it is the best way to respond by doing what they do. As Yang Jiechi said, the United States is not qualified to speak condescendingly with China, and the Chinese don't want this!
Only those who listen to reason can reason with him, and the unreasonable villains need to be beaten with a stick!
.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-