More than seven months have passed, the situation in Russia and Ukraine has shown an increasingly bad trend, which is mainly due to two reasons. First, the military aid of NATO to Ukraine has become increasingly high and has become increasingly high. Russia cannot tolerate it and directly issued a warning to the United States that "if long-range missile is provided, it is equivalent to directly participating in the war." The consequences are of course self-evident. This also means that the probability of Russia going to war with NATO has increased; secondly, after Ukraine's "four places" referendums to Russia, the United States encouraged Kiev to attack these four regions, but Russia said that "for the newly joined territory, it will use nuclear weapons to protect it." Behind such a statement, there may be a "chemical reaction".
It is not difficult to find out from this that whether it is the war between the United States and Russia, or the military collision due to the "new territory", it may lead to the occurrence of nuclear war . In order to eliminate the possibility of Russia using nuclear weapon , Ukrainian President Zelensky recently proposed an "idea" to the West, calling on NATO to "take action first" against Russia. In response, the K-Gong not only scolded him, but also specially named the names of the two countries of NATO.
According to reports from Global Network , Zelensky hopes that after NATO "takes preemptive" against Russia, Russian President's press secretary and spokesman for Kremlin Peskov, accusing Zelensky of such behavior as "an attempt to provoke the Third World War" and will lead to "unforeseeable catastrophic consequences." Peskov reminded the country and society to pay attention to the West's reaction after Zelensky's speech, "especially the United States and Britain need to pay attention to it," because "it is these two countries that actually control the actions of Kiev."
I have to say that Zelensky dares to come up with any idea now, but the consequences of doing so are probably not something Ukraine can afford. And to come up with such an "idea" will definitely make Ukraine lose points in the international community. From Peskov's response, it is not difficult to find three points.
First, Zelensky's call may be laying the groundwork for the actions of the United States and Britain afterwards. Just recently, the United States not only provided Ukraine with medium-range missile air defense system, but also sent the Ukrainian side the "Haimas" rocket launcher . These two powerful weapons, "one offense and one defense", will greatly improve the strength of the Ukrainian army. In addition, Kiev is also urging the US to provide "long-range missiles" that Russia warned of. , Biden and , President did not deny this, but was still "hesitating".
In addition, Ukraine also hopes that NATO countries will provide them with main battle tanks. If long-range missiles and main battle tanks are given to Kiev, war between NATO and Russia will inevitably begin; if such equipment is not provided, Ukraine may not last long, which is something the United States does not want to see. In this way, it is really impossible to rule out that NATO has a plan to "take the initiative" against Russia. As soon as it is going to "end" sooner or later, Zelensky is willing to bear this responsibility of "taking fire".
2 is the first time that the Russian side has clearly stated to the outside world that the United States and the United Kingdom are "controlling Ukraine", which has two signals.
The first one shows that no matter how large the war is fought, the two NATO countries, the United States and Britain, are Russia's main targets; the second one also shows to Germany and France, the United States' allies in Europe, that Russia can understand some of the actions of the two countries on the Ukraine issue, but if Russia goes to war with NATO, I hope France and Germany will not stand in front to "block bullets" for the United States and Britain. The same signal is also conveyed to other NATO European countries.
Third, the Russian side directly pointed out the consequences. If you do as Zelensky said, there will be "unpredictable catastrophic consequences."This sentence is for the United States and Britain to listen to. To put it bluntly, it is "Isn't it just a nuclear war? Russia is ready. Have you thought about the United States and Britain? Are you ready to return to the " Stone Age "?"
Of course, the Russian side's statement is not only to let Washington and London hear it, but also to let the people of the United States and Britain hear it, and let them think about it. On the issue of Ukraine, if their government bet on the people's wealth and lives, can they agree? Objectively speaking, the people of the United States and Britain may not agree, and they will point their anger directly at Ukraine and Zelensky, who came up with this "idea" - Ukraine is betting on the national destiny, so why should we pull our country into the water? And with such public opinion, what will Washington and London dare to do?
