After the Nord Stream pipeline was bombed, most people unanimously believed that it was the black hand of the United States, because it seems that the Nord Stream pipeline was damaged, and the United States has the greatest profit. So how likely is the United States to take action?
At present, the international community generally believes that the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline this time must be man-made. This has also caused speculation and reasoning from many people. If it is just analyzing from the perspective of returns.
First of all, it is Russia itself. The general view is that Russia will not break up its own business. After all, the existence of the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline is more like a link between economy and diplomacy, closely linking Russia and the member states of the EU . Although Russia is sanctioned by the EU, resulting in a significant reduction in energy procurement, it is still an important source of economic development for Russia. After the explosion, Nord Stream natural gas will be completely cut off. If the EU imposes sanctions on Russia again, no one will vote against it. The roadblock on Russia's energy dependence has been completely wiped out.
Secondly, European countries will not do this. Europe is in extremely shortage of energy. After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, European countries were short of oil and gas, resulting in constant domestic demonstrations and marches, and the people were dissatisfied with the government. For ordinary people, the cold winter now requires strong support from Russia's Nord Stream Natural Gas, but it was destroyed at this time and the restoration time is nowhere to be long, which has caused European countries to panic. Therefore, from the perspective of interests, Russia and European countries obviously will not do this.
So at present, who is the biggest beneficiary? The answer is actually obvious, that is the United States. On the one hand, the United States has been urging EU countries to increase sanctions on Russia, but Germany, which manages Nord Stream natural gas, has been pushing for three obstacles and four obstacles. After this damage, the EU has no reason not to listen to the United States. On the other hand, if Russia cuts off supply, the United States can replace it. The United States will definitely not miss this opportunity to make a fortune.
More importantly, after the Beixi Pipeline incident, Biden's February speech was dug out. When answering reporters' questions, he publicly stated that if the Russian-Ukrainian conflict broke out and Russia's behavior exceeded the boundaries, then the United States would not mind stopping the Beixi Pipeline, and the United States has the ability and confidence to do it.
Combining these factors, it is rumored online that it must have been done by the United States this time. In my opinion, although this matter is highly correlated with the United States, it may not be the US government, but some US military-industry groups or political brokers.
The Russian-Ukrainian conflict has been outbreaking for more than 200 days. Most of the weapons and equipment aided by the US government come from these military-industrial groups, so they do not want the war to end too early. The defenders of the steel plant were trapped and fighting, Ukraine's counterattack not long ago, and the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline were all catalysts of the conflict. The purpose was to not let the two sides cease too early to gain more benefits. In addition, there are a large number of political brokers in the United States. They are unofficial politicians and do things that are sow discord. Perossi's entry into the stage is the result of the political brokers' threading. His intentions are very sinister. In addition to trying to gain political capital, he also wants to take the opportunity to gain economic benefits.
This time, the Nord Stream pipeline was destroyed, and it may also be that some American political brokers used the countries in opposition to Eastern Europe and Russia to artificially destroy the Nord Stream pipeline, thereby achieving political and economic goals. Whether it is the US government, military-industrial groups or political brokers, the damage to the Nord Stream pipeline this time has a very bad impact. On the one hand, it intensified the conflict between Russia and European countries, thus indirectly causing it to be difficult to resolve the conflict between Russia and Ukraine peacefully. On the other hand, a large amount of natural gas leaks will have an impact on the natural ecology.
Finally, the Nordic Pipeline was artificially damaged from the seabed, which also reminded us that oil pipelines on both the seabed and land need to strengthen security protection. In addition, some measures need to be taken to reduce the crisis caused by energy.
If you like my videos, remember to collect and like them. I am Science Desk. See you next episode.
