According to Taiwan Strait Network , Taiwan media disclosed that former Kuomintang Chairman Ma Ying-jeou pointed out when attending the "35-year Review and Outlook for Cross-Strait Exchanges" held on the island that the DPP authorities do not recognize the "1992 Consensus ", which is the reason why cross-strait relations have deteriorated to the current situation. The two sides of the Taiwan Strait are by no means the so-called "two Chinas". The DPP should not only avoid war, but also make peace to promote cross-strait political consultation and dialogue.
Ma Ying-jeou's remarks pointed out the basic direction for developing cross-strait relations to the Taiwan authorities: recognize the 1992 consensus, make peace, and conduct political consultations with the mainland. This context is also the general trend of the current development of cross-strait relations. Finally, through the cross-strait political consultation process, the purpose of peaceful reunification and establishment of the Taiwan Special Administrative Region will be achieved. Taiwan is China's inherent territory, and cross-strait reunification is the development logic of China's "great unification" historical and cultural orientation, the mutual connection between blood and family ties between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and a major victory in defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity internationally.
Former Kuomintang Chairman Ma Ying-jeou publicly criticized the "Taiwan independence" manipulation of the Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party authorities, which shows the change in the political trend on the island. Since the People's Liberation Army's island closure combat readiness drill and the new white paper on the Taiwan issue, politicians on the island such as Hung Hsiu-chu , Ko Wen-je , Lv Hsiu-lien and other island politicians have called for peace from different angles on the cross-strait and seeking coordinated development. This has gradually formed a joint force on the island, prompting the political and public opinion atmosphere on the island to increasingly draw a clear line with "Taiwan independence". This has formed a change in the wind direction of unity and retreating on the island.
As a product of the agent power born from the US hegemony, the "Taiwan independence" forces are seriously out of touch with compatriots on the island and mainland compatriots in terms of interest representation. They regard "hardening foreign countries" as their self-reliance and interfering with the external interference of the United States and Japan. The "Taiwan independence" forces, the biological attribute, is an important starting point for the conclusion that "there is no Taiwan issue, only the Sino-US issue."
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait have the same language and species, and the bloodline is connected, and there is no inconsistent reason. With the increasing development of China's comprehensive national strength, the "Taiwan independence" forces that sell out the national and national interests for external interference will inevitably return to their due positioning: on the pillar of shame in history.
When examining the situation in the Taiwan Strait from a holistic perspective, 1996 and 2022 are two important time nodes. In August this year, the fact that the People's Liberation Army publicly demarcated the denial area in the Taiwan Strait with a combat readiness attitude and the external military patrol did not dare to advance was essentially sounded the clarion call for the extinction of the "Taiwan independence" forces. The main military interference of the hegemonic forces was blocked. The "Taiwan independence" forces born on the island relying on hegemonic interference naturally entered the process of extinction. At the same time, China has achieved results in countering US hegemony intervention with a firm attitude, and it will inevitably lead countries around the world that have "hard hegemony for a long time" in the international scope, forming a "liancheng" momentum to counter-hegemony expansion and defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of various countries.
this year's UN General Assembly , the Russian Foreign Minister warned the United States not to play with fire in the Taiwan Strait. The Philippine President expressed his support for the one-China principle and called for regional peace. Singapore Foreign Minister warned the United States not to make misjudgments on the Taiwan Strait, China's "red line" and China's "red line" was launched. Pakistan spoke on behalf of 70 countries on the Human Rights Council and advised the United States to stop creating excuses to interfere in China's internal affairs. In the showdown in August this year, China used practical actions to block hegemony interference from the military force outside the Taiwan Strait, and completely eliminated the space for sophistry of hegemony and its very few followers on an international scale.
The direct result of this is that more and more countries in the international arena dare to speak for China and their sovereignty are not violated. On the island, more and more politicians have begun to tend to be unified in their speeches, rather than "benefiting both ends" in the vague area of "no unity or no independence". In this transformation, the biggest direct help is the continuous development of China's comprehensive national strength, and the biggest contributors are the Chinese People's Liberation Army and the simple and unknown workers in China. When hegemony is receding and the situation in the Taiwan Strait has undergone a fundamental change, politicians on the island should recognize the situation as soon as possible, contribute to the unification, and take responsibility for the blood and nation.
