Jiang Lili Cover News. West China Metropolis Daily reporter Cao Xiao
html June 23, Xuyong, Luzhou, Sichuan. The case evaluation team of the County Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has contacted the townships in depth to conduct review and evaluation of the "closed" cases handled by the township Commission for Discipline Inspection and feedback on existing problems on the spot. The mistakes in thecase were pointed out one by one. Li Zhi, deputy secretary of the Guanxing Town Party Committee and secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission, admitted that he was a little embarrassed.
The Xuyong County Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision’s Case Quality and Effectiveness Assessment Team supervises the handling of “settled” cases through visits and verifications.
Since this year, in order to further solve the long-standing problem of self-handling and self-examination of "settled" cases and the inability to guarantee the quality of cases, the Xuyong County Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has started to standardize the clue handling procedures and explored the establishment of a quality control system for "settled" cases throughout the county. The "three evaluations and one notification" mechanism means that the case handling unit conducts self-evaluation and scoring on the case according to the "Xuyong County "Regulation Form" for Handling Procedures for "Settled" Problems and Clues. If the self-evaluation score is 90 points or above, the case handling unit shall report to the disciplinary inspection and supervision. Office review and scoring; the district contacts the Disciplinary Inspection and Supervision Office to conduct a paper-based review from the aspects of case facts, evidence, procedures, characterization, processing, etc., form a list of issues, and feed back to the undertaking unit for rectification; the case management office and the letters and calls office set up a joint evaluation team, each Conduct quarterly sampling reviews on "settled" cases and rate them according to a hundred-point system. Based on the scores, the quality of the cases is graded into ABCD four grades. Regular reports are made within the disciplinary inspection system and included in the annual review and investigation work assessment.
"After self-evaluation and review, the case management office usually only needs to check for omissions and fill in the gaps in the entire case, and the work efficiency has been significantly improved." Yi De, director of the Case Supervision and Management Office of the Xuyong County Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, said, "Three reviews and one notification "After the implementation of the working mechanism, errors in the case's factual evidence, documentary materials, and case handling procedures were rectified during the self-evaluation and review stages. The responsibility awareness and procedural awareness of the case handling personnel were significantly enhanced, and the quality of the cases was greatly improved.
The case quality and effectiveness assessment team of the Xuyong County Discipline Inspection and Supervisory Committee went to villages and towns to carry out assessment guidance.
"The handling of 'settled' cases is a process of responding to the concerns of the masses, and the quality of the cases must withstand the test of time." After accepting several case reviews, Li Zhi, secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission of Guanxing Town, said that he will strengthen business learning and Improve work capabilities and ensure the quality of cases is the first hurdle.
It is reported that the Xuyong County Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision relied on the "room and local" linkage cooperation area to set up 7 evaluation teams, using methods such as verification with documents, interviews, and feedback to evaluate the handling of "closed" cases in the county. Joint evaluation, supervision and evaluation, and on-site guidance. So far, 2 issues of work reports have been issued and 63 issues have been rectified.
“The process of carrying out self-evaluation, evaluation, and joint evaluation is also a process for disciplinary inspection and supervision cadres to examine themselves and continuously improve themselves in practice.” The relevant person in charge of the County Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision said that complaints and reports that are untrue will be investigated. We adopt various methods such as written clarification, face-to-face clarification, meeting clarification, notification clarification, media clarification, etc. to carry out the work of clarifying and correcting misconceptions on a regular basis, effectively taking responsibility for the cadres who have been "misunderstood" and supporting those who do the work.
[If you have news clues, please report them to us. Once adopted, we will be compensated. Follow us on WeChat for reporting materials: ihxdsb, QQ for reporting materials: 3386405712】
