Facts have proved that in addition to the tough guy Putin , Russia also has a group of politicians with even tougher attitudes. For example, Vice Chairman of the Russian Duma and former military commander general. In a recent TV interview, Gurulev publicly stated that if World War III was triggered by the blockade of the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, Russia's first bombing target would be the British capital London. As soon as these words came out, it immediately caused an uproar in Western public opinion, especially British Prime Minister Johnson.
Britain is most fond of playing the mainland balance game, and is more accustomed to playing the role of "stirrer". To sum up, it is: you fight life and death, and finally I, the British, come out to reap the harvest. The main ethnic groups are also Angsa, and the United States has also inherited the British strategic thinking. In both world wars, Britain got too close and was eventually involved, while the United States reaped the benefits. In this conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Britain and the United States are still playing the same trick, letting , Ukraine, , and small Eastern European countries provoke Russia in front of them, while others work hard and they reap the consequences.
Johnson probably didn’t expect that this time the Russians would directly target him. Recently, in an interview with the media, Johnson forcibly said that he did not think that Britain and Russia would eventually go to war. The British Prime Minister incidentally reiterated the Western conspiracy: they will ensure that the conflict is limited to Ukraine.
Johnson's meaning is very clear, which is to tell the British that you are safe. He Johnson assured that the war between Russia and Ukraine will only start in Ukraine and will not reach London.
Johnson’s words remind people of the famous British political satirical comedy "The Minister", which ironically proposed: The British defense policy is not to protect the United Kingdom, but to make the British people think they have obtained Protect. Johnson's operation perfectly explains the conclusion in "The Minister" - always make the British people feel that they are safe. But what is the actual situation?
On June 28, local time, former British Army Chief of Staff Richard Dannatt unveiled the fig leaf of the Johnson government. He pointed out that while provided massive funds and weapons to and Kiev in London, the British armed forces were in a very bad condition.
Also in the TV show, the former senior British military official pointed out without hesitation that the UK not only has a very small number of main battle tanks, but also lacks artillery and air defense systems . All in all, Britain's national defense is worrying. Once a war actually breaks out, it's hard to say how long Johnson's advocacy of "global Britain" can last.
The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has entered its fourth month, and anyone with a discerning eye can see that without the full support of Western forces such as Britain and the United States, the war would never have reached the point it is today. Especially as the leaders of the Group of Seven joint EU proposed at the G7 summit to support Ukraine indefinitely, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has actually become a war between Russia and the West, and Ukraine is only acting as a proxy for the West. exist as humans.
However, at the just-concluded G7 summit, Johnson refused to admit that the Russia-Ukraine conflict is essentially a conflict between Russia and the Western military alliance. Instead, he insisted that it was Russia's "invasion of an independent and sovereign country" and Accused Russia of trying to "expand the conflict."
Many Western politicians, like Johnson, are caught in the "elite divide". On the one hand, they hope that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine will continue to bring down Russia, but on the other hand, they are afraid that the war will expand and the war will spread to the mainland. However, under the century-old "Russian fear" sentiment, defeating Russia has become an obsessive obsession of Western politicians. At the G7 summit and subsequent NATO summits, the West is already planning to further "encircle" Russia.
Senior officials in Russia have mentioned World War III more than once. As the West, led by the United States, continues to strengthen its provocative policy against Russia, conflicts between Russia and NATO are becoming more and more likely.
Britain and the United States believe that provoking conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, provoking Lithuania to invade Russian enclaves and humiliating Russia can show their success.Gurulev's threat to "bomb London first if war breaks out!" undoubtedly sounded the alarm to the West. rabbits bite when they are anxious, let alone polar bears . Is it really that big of a difference whether we fight Lithuania or Britain?
Britain’s so-called national defense strategy of “making the British people think they are protected” will be of much use when it comes time to put it into practice? But when that time comes, Johnson will still be remembered in history, but it will be a stupid name like "Chamberlain Second".
