Recently, the uproar caused by a press conference in Urumqi made people think deeply. There is no doubt that in the current epidemic, it is inappropriate to compare maternity and baby products with pet products.
Everyone knows that maternity and baby products, including baby milk powder, are items that some babies must use. The lack of milk powder may affect a person's life, while pet products are non-essential products, and they are far from the gap between human life. Our country's laws stipulate that pets fall within the scope of property rights and do not have personal characteristics. From this perspective, it is surprising. Since the beginning of the epidemic, students have been taking online classes and have not had a tutorial. Do they consider ideological supply guarantee?
Psychologist Terry Wright has put forward a view: "The love that pets give to humans is not conditional. They are by your side. You don't have to be deliberately restrained, nor are you overly affected by them."
From the above point of view, we can summarize:
1 is not good at dealing with interpersonal relationships, so we choose to keep pets
First: Living alone at that time was very lonely;
Second: I hate interpersonal communication, so I keep pets.
Second, keeping pets can heal your emotions.
For some people with spiritual emptiness, they should provide for their supply from a thought rather than material perspective. What these people lack is spiritual food. We hope that during the epidemic, we will reshape the core socialist values, abandon the decadent capitalist ideas, and win this smoke-free war.
