Since Tsai Ing-wen took office, the DPP authorities have been accustomed to creating an image that is absolutely separate from the mainland in various fields, thereby stabilizing the basic foundation of the green camp and seeking political benefits for themselves, but they will eventually make jokes.
Not long ago, at the Taiwan legislative body questioning meeting, Kuomintang "legislator" Lu Mingzhe said that Taiwan held an drone flight activity, proving that Taiwan's drone team has made rapid progress within five years and can already form and automatically fill up the seats. Then, he changed his subject and pointed out that these drones, together with their operating systems, were all purchased from mainland companies' high-tech innovations. He also mocked that a drone came from Kinmen, and the DPP authorities were clamoring to take it down. Now more than 500 aircraft are flying on Tsai Ing-wen's head, but the DPP authorities are completely unaware of it.
According to media reports, the DPP authorities stipulate that mainland products cannot be used. Although civil control is not so strict, it involves Tsai Ing-wen, a leader of Taiwan, after all, so Su Zhenchang, the head of the Taiwan administrative department, was furious after hearing this and immediately ordered the relevant departments to investigate clearly, claiming that even mainland-made parts will be inspected in the future.
Mainland drones rank in the world's leading level. It is reasonable for Taiwan to purchase mainland drones. In order to create the illusion of "one China and one Taiwan", the Taiwan authorities took advantage of the situation and often "banned" mainland products. After this incident reached the mainland, Ma Xiaoguang, spokesman of the Taiwan Affairs Office of my country, responded that the DPP authorities always wear tinted glasses to look at mainland products, which shows that they have ghosts in their hearts and brains.
However, what is even more funny is that the drone incident has not been investigated clearly, and Taiwan has been exposed to the use of mainland products. According to media reports on the island, some time ago, a Taiwanese anchor who claimed to have settled in the mainland posted a video on social media, and the content of the video was suspected to be a group of training dummies. According to the order information, the batch of dummies will be sent to Taiwan for naval training. The anchor also pointed out that the order requirements cannot be said to be purchased from the mainland. After the incident was exposed, Taiwan's "Naval Command" confirmed that this batch of fakes were used for training for recruits from Taiwan's mainland corps, and stated that the relevant training tools were purchased from Taiwanese manufacturers and produced by the mainland, and the relevant procedures also comply with the "Procurement Law". Previously, Qiu Guozheng, head of the Taiwan Defense Department, claimed that the Taiwan military would check at all levels. Even if private manufacturers join, Taiwan also has relevant verification standards procedures and will not allow any mainland materials to enter. Now, Taiwan’s “Naval Command” directly admits the use of mainland products, which is equivalent to a “slap” the Taiwan authorities in the face.
At this time, it was less than a week since the DPP’s crushing defeat and Tsai Ing-wen resigned as party chairman, so it attracted more attention. This shows that the DPP authorities actually do not like to listen to it on the island, nor do everyone want to listen to it. In fact, the internal logic of the Taiwan authorities banning mainland products is very simple, that is, to create an atmosphere of high opposition between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and a military force on the island. It also subtly implies that as long as it is a mainland product, there may be various problems. It is either anti-"human rights and freedom" or "surveillance and eavesdropping" and must be replaced as soon as possible.
1
Analytical aircraft and military dummies have done many times such as neurotic and ironic events. For example, Taiwan’s administrative department strictly ordered all relevant institutions on the island to stop using all mainland communication products. Until the middle of this year, this inexplicable ban was expanded again, requiring the ban on all mainland communication products in public places, and even radio and electronic screens were not spared. This absurd move has no substantial effect except for the people's and the establishment of a character for the DPP to "anti-China and protect Taiwan" by destroying the people.
It is precisely because of the DPP authorities' hysterical cross-strait policy that they lost the "nine-in-one" election on the island. Facts have repeatedly proved that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have long been blood-in-law and shared weal and woe. Any means of forcibly splitting cross-strait ties will not succeed. The DPP's "brain-sick" anti-intellectual behavior will inevitably be despised by compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.