Since October 15, Biden 's mouth seems to have lost control, and he himself has made unfavorable remarks with the United States on many occasions.
Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the US ambassador to Islamabad and expressed protests against Biden's statement that " Pakistan is one of the most dangerous countries in the world."
Previously, Biden said in his speech that Pakistan is a country that has nuclear weapon but is not united within, so this country "may be one of the most dangerous countries in the world."
Pakistan said that Pakistan's nuclear weapons are currently being properly guaranteed, and Pakistan is a responsible nuclear country. This is true. Compared with the aggressive neighbor in the south of Pakistan, Pakistan has shown considerable conservative colors in both external strategy and internal governance.
At the very least, no one in the world has found that Pakistan is causing trouble near Siaqin Glacier , right? However, a South Asian nuclear power has frequently taken action against its neighbors.
So, when will you see the United States point fingers at this major power on South Asian subcontinent ?
After all, Biden is currently in a state of regret. After the United States withdrew from Afghanistan , Pakistan and other neighboring countries became the main force in the aftermath. With the full launch of the aftermath project, the whole world began to discover that during the occupation of Afghanistan, some of the United States were slashing and killing randomly, and what was lacking was steadfast construction.
Biden's mouth caused more than one thing to do, but also Saudi .
The United States and Saudi Arabia in history have experienced a very sweet honeymoon period in the 20th century. Saudi Arabia is equipped with a large number of Western-style weapons and is willing to cooperate with , White House to maintain US hegemony in the international energy market. Similarly, the United States also reciprocates. When Saudi Arabia was threatened by Saddam's rule at the end of the last century, it resolutely took action to help Saudi Arabia completely eliminate the threat of war.
However, after time entered 2010, the sweetness of both sides gradually faded.
The reason is very simple. The United States' strategy in Middle East has begun to become unbalanced. Due to the decline in the quality of the White House ruling team, it is difficult for the White House to achieve a balance between Israel, Iran , Saudi Arabia and other forces.
Press the gourd to float up, and the Saudis are the one that floats up.
More importantly, Biden, the old guy, spoke out during the election campaign to make Saudi Arabia a "untouchable country." So, the beam was completely formed.
At present, the United States hopes that Saudi Arabia can increase oil production, help it stabilize oil prices, and then control inflation in the United States . Saudi Arabia refused to hold talks with the United States on increasing oil production.
The White House is currently severely accusing Saudi Arabia of refusing to increase production to protect Russia, while Saudi Arabia stresses that it has the right to maintain stability in relations with traditional friendly countries. Saudi Arabia refuses to increase oil production to protect global economic from the impact of fluctuations in the international situation.
In short, it is said that the mother has the right reason.
also has a chaotic relationship between the United States and France.
Biden previously stated that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict may trigger the risk of the end of the nuclear war . After the sentence
was released, the American people did not respond much, but the European people were a little panicked.
plus the current problems of high energy prices in Europe and the intensification of grassroots conflicts at the grassroots level in society, the negative impact caused by Biden's words cannot be ignored, greatly increasing the difficulty of governance for European leaders.
Macron emphasized at the EU Leaders Informal Meeting that Europe and the entire Western society should speak carefully, especially on the topic of nuclear war.
Russia also saw this chaos in the West.
Russian President Putin has stated a few days ago that he has no plans to hold talks with Biden during the G20 summit in November.
As the tension between the United States and Russia continues to escalate, former US Presidents Obama and Trump both pop up and express their opinions.
The US Capitol Hill newspaper reported on October 17 that Obama is concerned about the current situation where the United States and Russia have basically lost high-level communication channels. Obama hopes that both sides can maintain basic restraint, at least at critical moments, and avoid conflicts between major powers.
Obama believes that at present, we cannot judge the next stage of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict just from the temporary offensive and defensive state. As the war broke out, Putin successfully concentrated his power to an unprecedented level. If Putin operates properly next, Russia will fully demonstrate its resilience in this war.
Trump also changed his previous style of quarrel with Biden and began to change his calm face. Trump said he was willing to be a middleman in negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.
Trump stressed that from the perspective of geopolitical , the Russian-Ukrainian conflict was originally a war that should not have happened. Trump said that if he still takes office in the White House, the hostile situation between Moscow and Kiev and will not rise and become a conflict.
The war between Russia and Ukraine shows no sign of a halt. If the situation between the two sides continues to escalate, it will really become a conflict between NATO and Russia.
This is the risk in Trump's eyes that may trigger World War III.
At present, the United States is still constantly giving away knives to Ukraine. The war will inevitably continue. The escalation of the situation is inevitable, but it depends on when it escalates to a point where all parties cannot handle it.
Since launching a counterattack in September, there seems to be no new news on the Ukrainian battlefield that is full of foggy in the past month. From October 15 to 17, the Ukrainian government issued a series of news stating that the Ukrainian army's combat operations in the direction of Donbas are currently facing difficulties.
Zelensky admits that although the Ukrainian army is still actively carrying out actions and constantly conducting tactical counterattacks. But overall, the Ukrainian army has entered a defensive position, and the Ukrainian army has held its position at various tactical nodes.
Russia's new forces have not arrived at the front line yet, but the Ukrainian army has already felt considerable pressure. As Russia shrinks its front, some troops are able to regroup to support various tactical points.
The 4th Guards Motorized Brigade and other troops of the Russian Army have already started to fight back, and the war suddenly changed back to its previous mode. Ukraine dug trenches and defended, and Russia's firepower attacks.
Ukraine admitted that the current war in Bachmut is the most intense and arduous. The Ukrainian army has invested heavily in this direction, but it has suffered a lot of losses in the battle every day.
The current war and situation in the direction of Ukraine are quietly changing, and the alliance between Russia and Belarus is constantly strengthening.
In fact, many friends will be surprised that Belarus itself is not very large, so why are Russia and Belarus so strong?
is so strong that he dares to join forces to face NATO.
Belarus is rarely in the focus of people's attention because this country is too ordinary, and it is not close to the sea or mountains, and it is not very large in population and resources are not rich.
If you want to say that this country has any outstanding strengths, it is that this country has the ability to produce and manufacture three-in-one special vehicles for the missile transportation, storage and launch.
This is one of the only two countries in the world that have the production capacity of similar multi-axle special vehicles.
Although Belarus is not big, it is undoubtedly crucial for Russia. The total border from Moscow to Poland and is only about 900 kilometers, of which Belarus accounts for 520 kilometers. When Nalun invaded Russian , he set out from Poland and followed this road to the east. After passing through Smolensk , a fierce battle broke out with the Russian army near the small town of Borodino, which is more than 100 kilometers away from Moscow.
When the German army invaded the Soviet Union, the main force of the central German army also rushed straight to Moscow along the direction of Belarus' capital Minsk , and then to Smolensk. On this offensive axis, major battles such as Minsk Battle, Smolensk Battle, and Viazima siege battle broke out continuously. The Soviet army finally led the German army to the city of Moscow with millions of losses.
So this direction is the strategic depth that Russia must keep in mind no matter what. If Belarus turns to the west, it means that the enemy is approaching a place only more than 400 kilometers away from Moscow, and the Battle of Smolensk is the first time to set out.
If Belarus merges into Russia, it means that the Russian army has obtained a protruding point of more than 500 kilometers ahead, facing Poland directly, and to the north, it can encircle the three Baltic countries, and to the south, it can encircle Western Ukraine. It is quite similar to the fact that Nazi Germany had the military bridgehead of East Prussia when facing Poland. Russia's military situation will be greatly strengthened - because sometimes the offensive position is not necessarily for offense, but can also be used as a bargaining chip to improve its defensive posture.
It is precisely because of this that Russia signed an integration treaty with Belarus just after the Soviet Union collapsed, and made a move to join forces to keep warm. Although the progress later was not fast, Russia has been giving Belarus many economic benefits, such as providing cheap natural gas and providing various discounts in purchasing Belarusian products. These all constitute an effective support for the Belarusian economy and even the regime.
Since the 2020 new crown pandemic, the new crown pneumonia epidemic has also seriously weakened Russia's military capabilities. Russia's strategic nuclear power and military advantages such as military aerospace are strong guarantees of the national security concept. In recent years, the gap in defense budget between Russia and the United States has widened, and the epidemic has posed a threat to Russia's military-industrial defense system, which has weakened its position as a powerful weapon exporter to a certain extent.
After the outbreak of the epidemic, the Russian Ministry of Finance proposed to cut national arms investment by 5% in the next three years and reduce the allocation of 225 billion rubles. This not only restricts the overall goal of Russian military equipment to achieve comprehensive "modernization", but also leads to its shift from a period of sharply enhanced capabilities to a maintenance stage, but also affects Russia's arms export revenue. In 2020, the rankings of two Russian defense and arms companies, the top 100 military-industry groups in the world, " tactical missile " and "diamond-Antai" companies, declined again. Faced with the intensification of the epidemic, epidemic prevention and control and national health expenditures in fiscal expenditures in various countries have increased, while purchasing weapons and arms have been affected to varying degrees. Russia is facing a difficult arms market environment, and national defense expenditures will be further restricted.
Under such a difficult situation, Russia and Belarus need to hold each other together to keep warm.
This time, the relationship between the two countries has made another breakthrough, and the strong suppression of Russia and Belarus is an important background. In fact, Russia's influence is constantly being challenged in the "non-war oppressive" strategic competition with Western countries such as the United States. The deterioration of relations between Russia and Ukraine, the increasing instability of relations with Belarus, the increasing threat of Eastern Europe to Russia, and Central Asia is in a transitional stage of political transformation, etc., which shows that the threat factors of Russia's external environment, especially the surrounding environment, are increasing.
Russia-Belarus integration will inevitably have an impact on the world, which declares the end of Belarus' strategic wavering. From then on, the relationship between the two countries will be between the Soviet Union and CIS , facing strategic pressure from all parties. Although it is impossible for the Russian army to re-deploy heavy troops in Belarus to pose a threat to the West, it is reported that Russian military personnel have appeared on the western border of Belarus.
is connected to European foot binding Poland's extreme anti-Russia and anti-Russia sentiment, as the alliance between Belarus and Russia continues to deepen. In the future, the dangers of the wave-white border will be intensity will increase, and Poles will face Russian soldiers face-to-face again.NATO may use this to speed up the speed of increasing military deployment in Poland. Before this, the US military had built new barracks and weapons warehouses in Poland and began to deploy the entire armored force . Although neither side shows signs of fighting here for the foreseeable future, the strategic meaning cannot be ignored.
So, on October 16, the Lukashenko government spoke out several times, emphasizing that the West should not try to direct the war to the territory of the Russian Federation. According to Russia's national security strategy, once the above situation occurs, Russia can use a variety of weapons and equipment.
Lukashenko was interviewed by NBC reporter Kyle Simmons while attending the meeting of the CIS heads of state in Astana, Kazakhstan on the 14th. "If you push a person or a country into a corner, (the latter) has only one way out - to move forward," Lukashenko said in an interview. "That's why don't cross the red line, you can't cross them."
Lukashenko revealed that the current Kremlin has not set up plans for the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
Obviously, the initiator of the nuclear weapons risk between Russia and Ukraine is precisely the Western media. They hope to drag Russia into the quagmire by creating this public opinion trap, so that Russia will completely lose its initiative on war and peace issues.
In fact, for Russia, which has had nuclear weapons for decades, the Kremlin is very clear that a nuclear power's use of nuclear weapons will definitely trigger a chain effect. Russia is obviously not at the end of its reach, and it needs to use nuclear weapons to resolve the current overwhelming conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-