[Editor's Note] This article is authorized by the author himself and is exclusively published on the Qin'an Strategy Headline Account. It is reprinted from the official account "Oryuan Viewpoint". There are many exciting contents, and everyone is welcome to follow.
The retreat of the aircraft carrier "Reagan" is of course a delaying strategy. Behind the seemingly restrained military operations of the United States is the climax of the "technology war"...
htmlOn August 12, the US Department of Commerce issued another new ban, and four technologies including ECAD chip design software prohibited exports to China.
12, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) under the U.S. Department of Commerce released new export controls, establishing new export controls for four technologies including advanced semiconductors.
specifically includes: semiconductor substrate gallium oxide ; diamond; computer-aided design software ECAD designed for the development of integrated circuits with Huquan field effect transistor (GAAFET) structure; and boost combustion (PGC) technology. The ban on
will come into effect on August 15.
In other words, the "technology war" of the United States is carried out in a " blitzkrieg " way, striving to influence China's chip design and production to the greatest extent.
Its intention is extremely sinister.
According to relevant information, most of the US Department of Commerce’s export control technologies are for dual purpose of military and civilians. The specific application of
technology on several sides is as follows:
ECAD: is a type of software tool used to design, analyze, optimize and verify the performance of integrated circuits. GAAFET is a key technical node for expanding to processes under 3 nanometers and below.
Gallium oxide and Diamond (artificial): It allows semiconductors to work under harsh conditions.
PGC technology: is mainly used in aerospace, including rockets and hypersonic systems.
And the key is to develop GAAFET ECAD software, without it, you can't make a 3nm chip.
plus the 14nm-level lithography machine that was required not long ago by the United States to export to China's 14nm-level lithography machine to China should also be restricted. This is a comprehensive blockade of China's chip manufacturing industry. The United States intends to completely crack down on China's chip industry chain as a whole.
Last week, the United States finally passed the "Chip Act", which shows that the United States' control of the world's chip industry chain and its key suppression of China's chip industry are no longer a case but a national policy. This requires China to find solutions and countermeasures as soon as possible.
In fact, this is the perfect "technology war".
If there are still people who fantasize that we can relax our attitude on this issue and try to get the "understanding" of the US side to lift these restrictions, it is undoubtedly a matter of being a tiger.
Unfortunately, there are still so-called people who know the beauty and support the beauty to find the reasons from China. If we really look for the reason from China, we can only say that it is because we are developing too fast and so good that the United States will hate it and suppress it wildly.
This is a hurdle that you don’t want to pass.
is a bit passive than a slightly passive "technology war". Fortunately, we can gain the initiative in other aspects by relying on an active attack. For example, in the financial battlefield.
In fact, judging from the "trade war" that has lasted for nearly four years, the United States has not found any effective way to deal with China from an economic perspective. The tariffs imposed by the United States in the "trade war" have been transferred to the United States' own inflation rate without exception.
Therefore, the United States cannot find a better way to China in terms of finance and trade.
The United States dare not launch a financial war easily. First, it has serious structural problems, such as the 980 billion US dollars of government bonds are still in the hands of China. As long as China wants, it can sell at any time, and even reduce it to a negligible level like Russia, and simultaneously begins trying to establish a RMB payment system.
exchange rate . The United States dare not try this part of Treasury bonds, so the United States obviously seized the capital market part on the financial battlefield.
Currently, the United States has begun to use the " Foreign Company Accountability Act " passed last year to attack Chinese companies listed in the United States, requiring these Chinese companies to maintain their listing status in the US capital market under the conditions of full financial nudeness.
But this is obviously impossible. Therefore, Chinese companies are facing a wave of delisting from the United States.
Large platform companies including Alibaba have also begun to seek transfer to Hong Kong.
htmlOn the afternoon of August 12, another big news came out. On the same day, five Chinese companies announced that they would delist from , the New York Stock Exchange, .
5 Chinese companies include: Petroleum , Sinopec , China Aluminum , China Life and Shanghai Petrochemical .
In other words, how can enterprises involved in China's strategic security such as China Petroleum and Sinopec announce the so-called " audit draft " to them in accordance with the requirements of the United States? How could this national-level strategic data be made public to the United States?
This time, the delisting of the five major state-owned enterprises, coupled with the previous collective delisting of the three giants of China Telecom , the fact that China and the United States decoupling from the perspective of the capital market is coming to an end.
Some people think that this is a signal of lightweight installation. We do not speculate, but it can be considered that Sino-US relations can no longer go back before the establishment of the next new world order.
Therefore, there is no room for improvement in Sino-US relations in the short term. Strategic contradictions can never be resolved at the tactical level.
To put it bluntly, this contradiction is an inevitable manifestation in the game between China and the United States.
To put it simply, this is a major background that every Chinese must face in his personal life and development plan, and he must be prepared.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-