Before explaining this question, we must first figure out what is tin bone?

Before explaining this problem

We first need to figure out

What is tin bone?

This thing

As the name suggests, it is the bones in the tin

Most of them are stick-shaped

However, with different species, its shape also changes certainly

The tin bones of male walrus are like batons

The top of the tin bones of squirrels are spade-shaped, and there are also sharp teeth

In addition,

It is not connected to other bones

When summoned, it will be pushed to the tin tin

The role of

in the qualitative part of the

provides many conveniences and benefits for animals to "applaud"

Benefits 1: Trigger ovulation

For some species,

ovulation only when it reaches xxoo (like a female cat)

So some people think that tin bone can stimulate ovulation

Benefits 2: Overcome friction

Scientists also proposed the "friction hypothesis"

(vaginal Friction hypothesis)

believes that tin bones can make males overcome friction

makes it easier for themselves to enter females

Benefits 3: Help reproduce

Some people also believe that tin bones can prolong the time

Because for males,

prolong the time can reduce females

chance to mating with other males

This theory is called "cock-blocking" (cock-blocking)

This behavior also means that

can increase the chance of female pregnancy

gives males more initiative

Why do humans have no tin bones?

Actually, a long time ago

Our direct ancestor ape

is

But the reason why tin bones were evolved and eliminated

mainly have the following three reasons

1: monogamous marriage method

This method produces

reduces a large number of competitors for men

Old men no longer need to hurry up and let females conceive before

competitors come

After all, animals must seize the time to conceive

while humans have no time limit

2: The time is too short

generally has tin bones The animals

Their xxoo time is relatively long

and the average time of humans

is usually within 7 minutes...

So

Tin bones don't seem necessary for humans...

3: DNA loss

American orthopedic expert Philip Reynold

A article published in the journal Scientific American says that

Humans have more than 500 sets of DNA fragments

has been missing over time

which includes the DNA related to tin bones 2

4: Women's choice preferences

Yale Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology O. Prum

once put forward a view that belongs to the aesthetic category.

says that women prefer tin bones missing

and men with larger tin bones

so they can get more opportunities to reproduce

Seeing this

Maybe some friends will have questions

Without tin bones, what does humans rely on xxoo?

Nowadays,

male compatriots want ♂♂

mainly rely on sponge congestion

Every time you participate in the applause of love

cavernosate will complete the mission from soft to hard

I believe that old men have learned more about their bodies after reading

so

comments and likes!

-end-

#Healthy Life Diary##39Healthy Super Bundle#

References:

[1]Matilda Brindle, theconversation.com, How penis bones help principals win the mating game – and why humans might have lost theirs

[2]Human-specific loss of regulatory DNA and the evolution of human-specific traits, nature.com, Cory Y. McLean, Philip L. Reno, Alex A. Pollen, Abraham I. Bassan, Terence D. Capellini, Catherine Guenther, Vahan B. Indjeian, Xinhong Lim, Douglas B. Menke, Bruce T. Schaar, Aaron M. Wenger, Gill Bejerano & David M. Kingsley

[3] Wang Yi. Humans have evolved the tail twice. Science Grand View Garden, 2017(4): 61-61.

[4] Cao Linsheng, Zhou Huiliang. The pathogenesis of abnormal erection of Dingding and its treatment. Chinese Journal of Orthodontic Science, 2005, 19(2): 66-69.

[5] AlanDIXSON JennaNYHOLT Matt ANDERSON. There is a positive correlation between the length of tinton bones in mammals and the elongated insertion pattern. Acta Zoology, 2004, 50(4): 490-503.

[6] Zhang Yingao, Hu Liquan. A new view on the erectile mechanism of tinton erectile-the role of nitric oxide in tinton erectile. Journal of Hubei University for Nationalities: Medical Edition, 1997(1): 45-48.