Former president of the "Chinese Culture Association" Liu Zhaoxuan
Liu Zhaoxuan resigned as president of the Taiwan "Chinese Culture Association" the day before yesterday.
Previously, the DPP authorities used all their might to seize the "Chinese Culture Association". Tsai Ing-wen seemed to be determined to win this position. I wonder if she would take over the president of the "Chinese Culture Association" as she wished?
Chinese Culture Association:
"Chinese Culture Association" was established in July 1967. It was originally named "Chinese Cultural Rejuvenation Movement Promotion Committee", and was represented by Chiang Kai-shek .
In March 1991, the Chinese Cultural Rejuvenation Movement Promotion Committee was renamed the "Chinese Cultural Rejuvenation Movement General Association", with Lee Teng-hui as the president. During Li's reign, he praised Chinese culture in any public place.
In December 2006, the "Chinese Cultural Rejuvenation Movement Association" was renamed "'National' Cultural Association". This is part of Chen Shui-bian's series of "de-Sinicization" actions.
In January 2010, Ma Ying-jeou recommended Liu Zhaoxuan as the president of the "National Cultural Association". At the end of the same year, Liu Zhaoxuan announced that he would change his name to the "Chinese Cultural Association". The restoration of "China" by the Culture Association represents Ma Ying-jeou and the Kuomintang's correction of Chen Shui-bian's approach.
From New Year's Day in 2011, the name of "'National 'Cultural Association'" is changed to "Chinese Cultural Association".
This is the past and present life of the "Chinese Culture Association".
A Is "Chinese Culture Always" rich?
According to Chen Chi-mai, the Cultural Association received a total of NT$16 million in donations at the beginning of its establishment in 1967, of which NT$14 million was a proportion of NT$87%. Most of the executive committees are government officials of the Malaysian authorities, and it is obvious that most of them are appointed by the Taiwan authorities. Now if someone refuses to return it, the Taiwan internal department should administer according to the law and issue a warning in accordance with the "People's Organization Law". If there is no improvement within 3 months, it will be dissolved.
Editor:
etc. How much love, hate and affection are there between the blue and green in the middle? The editor doesn’t know, but it was 41 years since 1967 when Ma Ying-jeou came to power. Has the government officials of the Ma administration traveled through time? Secondly, to whom will the "Chinese Culture Association" be returned? To the Tsai Ing-wen authorities? The Democratic Progressive Party’s national representative has just created the new idiom “Shifang Shuling”. Isn’t it just that the Taiwanese authorities are committed to “going to China” in a political atmosphere where “going to China” is acquiesced to “going to China”? Third, according to Chen Chi-mai, if Tsai Ing-wen cannot be regarded as the president, the "Chinese Culture Association" seems to be disbanded. Then is the purpose of snatching it to change its name again like Chen Shui-bian?
Today's China Times pointed out that the "Chinese Cultural Association" may have a glorious history of founding, but after the first political party rotation in Taiwan, the Kuomintang, which was "ruled" again at the time, actually received a small and small poor agency that could not even support itself, but it was just a name "cultural association".
Editor:
It seems that if the media colleagues are more trustworthy, right?
B Does the "Chinese Culture Association" have the right?
This editor can tell you responsibly that the "Chinese Culture Association" is a civil society and has always been committed to promoting culture through the form of civil society; in other words, this does not involve power.
However, Cai Ban doesn't think so. Therefore, Liu Zhaoxuan, the former president of the "Chinese Cultural Association", who just resigned, suggested that since the Taiwan authorities believe that the "Chinese Cultural Association" is not a civil society, a budget should be prepared to allow it to develop continuously. Avoid the continued occurrence of strange things like mobilizing hundreds of members to join every four years.
This strange thing is this:
Liu Zhaoxuan's term expired in November. As early as August this year, a pro-green media called for the "China Culture Association" to return to the past practice of "president" serving as president, with Tsai Ing-wen as president. However, Liu Zhaoxuan believes that this move is not a convention, which triggers a quarrel between the two sides.
Taiwan media reported that in order to ensure that Tsai Ing-wen can successfully "take power", the green camp mobilized more than 600 "people" who "whole people" applied for joining the club, intending to squeeze out Liu Zhaoxuan.
Editor:
And the more than 600 people mobilized by the DPP are more than twice the original members of the "Chinese Culture Association", and the intention of "washing green" member structure is very obvious. The Green Camp has also been criticizing Liu Zhaoxuan for "turning public property into private property" and "dominates the Cultural Association."
Korean think tank convener Lin Yufang once said that "The Democratic Progressive Party seems to be a 'big eater'. He wants to eat anything, can eat anything, and dares to eat anything! The Kuomintang has fallen, but the Democratic Progressive Party seems to be not full yet?
"China Culture Association" 6th Tenth Executive Committee convened
Liu Zhaoxuan's tenth position expired on November 21, 2016, and the 10th Executive Committee meeting of the 6th "China Culture Association" was held on the same day to discuss the handover issue. The former "Legislative Yuan" Wang Jinping led the leadership of the former "Legislative Yuan" and 12 entrepreneurs who served as "General Yuan" published on the 20th. The statement calls for "complete handover according to previous practices".
Editor:
Editor must insert a sentence here. This "handover according to law" means handing over the president's position to Tsai Ing-wen, the current leader of Taiwan. Isn't this conveying the Tsai administration's meaning?
Because these 12 "executive committee members" did not attend the "executive committee and advisory committee meeting" on the 21st, the meeting was streamed.
Liu Zhaoxuan criticized Wang Jinping for joining hands with the DPP's general convening Ke Jianming to deal with the personnel case of the Cultural Association with political means. In response, Wang Jinping called for justice.
Wang Jinping said yesterday (23rd) that regarding the "Chinese Cultural Association" Executive Committee meeting, he had to contact Ke Jianming, the general convener of the Democratic Progressive Party, from beginning to end. The outside world said that he was the leader was completely misunderstanding. He also denied that he was the "overthrowing Liu faction". He respected Liu Zhaoxuan's resignation and affirmed his contribution to the Cultural Association.
Wang Jinping's intervention caused the "Wang Ke system" to be reproduced again. Wang Jinping further stated, saying that Ke Jianming told him that Tsai Ing-wen may not necessarily be the president of the General Assembly. At this time, what is the significance of Wang Jinping's statement? What does the reappearance of the Wang Ke system mean?
"Straits" Shinkansen Current Affairs Commentator Qiu Yi pointed out that Tsai Ing-wen must win the "Chinese Culture Association" because it has both resources and functions. One is cut off Ma Ying-jeou's wings, and Liu Zhaoxuan's president is gone. It has a very good effect on Tsai Ing-wen's implementation of power and "cultural Taiwan independence"; the other is that after winning the "Chinese Culture Association", if Tsai Ing-wen himself serves as the president, it will arouse social disgust, so Ke Jianming said that Tsai Ing-wen will only serve as the honorary president. Who should I find as the president? It is obvious that Wang Jinping is the best candidate. , so the outside world cannot say that this is called the blue-green struggle, because Wang Jinping is also blue on the surface.
23 Taiwan's United Daily News:
During Liu Zhaoxuan's presidency, he had a lot of contact with mainland culture and politics under the name of "Chinese culture". In the current cross-strait relations, did Tsai Ing-wen want to follow this "cultural path" to open up the "third track" of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait?
24 Taiwan China Times:
If this is true, it can only be said that Tsai Ing-wen is naive. The cross-strait needs to interact with each other, which is obviously a prosperous road. Tsai Ing-wen does not leave, but insists on robbing this path. Culture always requires no one and no money. The situation today is based on Liu Zhaoxuan's name, face and inside. Shangguan Ding has a way to talk about cultural exchanges with the other side, but Tsai Ing-wen just can't (Shangguan Ding is the pseudonym of Liu Zhaoxuan).
24 Taiwanese scholars: "Famous" should be "sentenced"
Recently, the handover of the "Chinese Culture Association" and the inappropriate speeches of the people's generation on ripping and calligraphy are related to where Chinese culture will go in Taiwan in the future.
Tsai Ing-wen should explain the future development direction of the "Chinese Culture Association" from the height of the leaders of Taiwan, and give full play to the functions of the "Chinese Culture Association". After all, this is related to the pattern of Taiwan's cultural subjects and the major events of cross-strait cultural exchanges. In addition to "famous and righteousness", we should also be "sentenced".
The editor is not optimistic about the beautiful speculations of Taiwan media.After all, the DPP has been very ugly since it came to power. It has been grabbing all the way, grabbing official positions, grabbing fat, grabbing voice, grab resources... Now even the position of "president" that has always been going quickly is to grab. I wonder if he is planning to sell "political" dog meat with the "culture" sheep's head?
The editor first puts a question mark here.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-