Kaohsiung The fire in the "City in the City" caused a problem. The Blue Army questioned that the City in the City stopped applying for public security after the commercial facilities were completely abandoned in 2002. The DPP has been in power for a long time and is still a bureaucratic and shirkish responsibility. DPP city councillor Li Qiaoru said that the "city in the city" was mixed with residential and business as early as when the Kuomintang was in power, and verbal abuse could not solve the problem.
Kaohsiung Municipal Government Bureau stated on the 16th that "City City" obtained a use license on January 14, 1981, and the use of the 7th to 11th floors was an office, but it was violated at that time. It was divided into households and had a compartment and 195 households to live in. After the 100-year exemption method, it can be used as a residential property. Because the actual use is a residential property, there is no need to apply for a public security declaration.
"City in the City" publicly ordered the report that year. (Photo taken from Kang Yucheng's Facebook)
Regarding the Kaohsiung City Government's claim that after the promulgation of the "Kaohsiung City Buildings Free from Change of Use License" in 2001, it can be used legally as a residential property without the need for public security declaration. Lv Ziwei, spokesperson of the Kaohsiung Party Committee of the Kuomintang, questioned that the city city stopped applying for public security after the commercial facilities were completely abandoned in 2002, and still want to shirk responsibility?
He said that the DPP has been in power in Kaohsiung for a long time and should turn a blind eye to the mayors of green camps such as Tsai Changting, Chen Ju, Ye Julan, and Chen Chimai? Moreover, the "no change method" to turn commercial offices into residential buildings is a custom administrative rule for the Kaohsiung City Government. Can it be exonerated for yourself and legalized in this way, and become an excuse for not having fire security inspections?
DPP city councillor Kang Yucheng presented evidence to show the newspaper reports and advertisements on August 27, 1977, that is, "City in the City" publicly accepted the ordering. The content mentioned that the plan for the 7th to 12th floors is that small suites and suites are all made of West German bathroom equipment, etc., emphasizing that the so-called "City in the City in the City" has only had compartments in recent years, which is not a fact.
Fast and salt senior MP Li Qiaoru said that the "city in the city" is governing across the blue and green, the DPP will not evade responsibility, and the Kuomintang should not be happy to see the hunt, nor should it be deluded to use "mouth guns" to solve the problem. The core of the case is that the relevant regulations of the Taiwan authorities are insufficient, which has caused local governments to be stunted. The most important thing now is to quickly revise the "law" to solve it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-