On March 8, according to China News Service, the blue and green factions on Taiwan’s island began to debate the issue of war and harmony between the Taiwan Strait. The blue camp “legislator” Luo Mingcai questioned Su Zhenchang, the “stubborn Taiwan independence element” and asked Su Zhenchang to instruct the “Executive Yuan” to take practical measures to eliminate the risks of war. Su Zhenchang refused to accept Luo Mingcai's statement, saying that " can only stop the war by preparing for war, and that Ukraine's various practices in the war are worth learning from ." Su Zhenchang played the " empathy " card when he was questioned. He said that as soon as the battle ends began, the most victims were civilians, especially the elderly, weak, women and children. But what touches Ukraine is the fact that the young father sent the woman's daughter to the border and he turned back to defend the country himself. So this is the place where the Russian military's military's military operations are not smooth today, and it is worth learning from in Taiwan. It is also because Ukraine's unity and resistance to aggression moved the whole world, so the power of help became increasingly greater. Su Zhenchang, who seized the talk, asked Luo Mingcai continuously why he didn't "condemn Russia", and Luo Mingcai finally made excuses for "I am not familiar with Russia."
DPP should not learn Kiev e tricks
What exactly should the DPP "learn" from the Ukrainian war? The most worrying thing is to learn from the evil trick of Zelensky's government in distributing weapons to the people. After the Zelensky government distributed weapons to the people, the public order in major Ukrainian cities disappeared. Not only did there be "mistake attacks" between armed militias and government forces, but also exchanges of fire between armed militias of different factions, causing a large number of unnecessary casualties and exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in Ukrainian cities. Even so, from the perspective of the overall process of the war, when the Ukrainian government forces retreated into the city to prepare for street fighting, the armed militia and government forces in the city dragged the Russian army into street fighting in the city, causing the progress of the Russian military's military operations to be greatly lagged behind. Considering that the DPP authorities are far more "no lower limit" than the Zelensky government in terms of shamelessness, it is not ruled out that the DPP authorities will "learn like this" and set up similar tactics to turn major cities in Taiwan into battlefields for street fighting, and achieve the goal of "dragging and waiting for change" as much as possible. Of course, Su Zhenchang's words also have a second meaning. Among the examples he gave, there was an example of a young Ukrainian father. He naturally knew the examples of Ukrainian politicians and elites "run away" before the war began. So whether Su Zhenchang would "learn like this" and ran away at a critical moment is unknown. Further, the key to the current war in Ukraine is that Zelensky is still using information to declare to the outside world that he "still stay in Kiev". So have the main members of the DPP authorities used similar means to "persist in Taipei until the end"? I'm afraid they don't have the courage or the skills.
Condemn Russia? Is it a DPP behavior?
After the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated sanctions against Russia, U.S. companies began to respond to relevant sanctions and bans. However, among the lengthy list of companies involved in sanctions, TSMC is on the list. It is obvious that under the manipulation of the DPP, Taiwanese companies have also begun to "hardly ride on the popularity" to help the DPP authorities "give their presence" in the international community. On key war and peace issues, Su Zhenchang evasively criticized Luo Mingcai for "not condemning Russia." Luo Mingcai and others' inquiries against Su Zhenchang showed that the blue camp forces on the island and even other forces have seen that no matter whether they win or lose in the end, Taiwan's losses will be immeasurable, so war must be avoided to the greatest extent. However, the DPP authorities refused to stop implementing provocative strategies on the issue of "Taiwan independence" and still expressed their desire to "prepare for war to the end", which shows that the DPP authorities' manipulation still exists and are trying to "resist to the end".
The mainland will "learn lessons"
The intensification of the Ukrainian issue shows that although our era still appears to be peace and development as the theme, in fact, the United States, which is unwilling to give up manipulation of global hegemony, is still trying to control the core of the world order in the barbaric era of "whoever listens to whoever has his fist hard." China has established its status as a major power through economic and trade development, and trade is also a continuation of politics. Where political influence is insufficient, there is no sustainable profit-making market. Judging from the political changes in Iraq , Libya , Sudan , Thailand and Ukraine, the economy is also a continuation of politics. In fact, if the economy is "fat", you cannot fight. Ukraine, and then the turmoil and fissions that occurred in Iraq, Libya, Sudan, etc., provided warnings to the Chinese who are currently in the grand slam-style profit-making triumph that the trade situation will be reversed. We used to think that as long as we could provide the international community with high-quality and low-cost public products, we could make profits in the world and gain a foothold. Now it is obvious that this is not the case; how can money-making be a purely economic behavior? It must follow politics later. Trade is also a continuation of politics. This is true in Libya, Sudan and Ukraine today, and its trade is politically inclined. China must revive and complete the reunification of the motherland, and have corresponding security space. Too much expansion is unsafe, but China is also unsafe without the basic space and the most basic security boundaries.
So, for the rising China, where should its most basic security boundary be? The entire eastern coastal economy formed by China in reform and opening up is a "golden zone" that drives the national economy, and it is also because this zone is closely close to all the important conflict hotspots of East China Sea , including "Taiwan independence", which itself lies in huge risks. For example, China's economic centers such as Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and the newly built Hangzhou Bay Cross-Sea Bridge are so close to the East China Sea hotspots that our land-based military forces alone cannot complete its security tasks. Technically speaking, although we have considerable maritime strategic power, without the unification of the Taiwan Strait, China cannot enter in vain and control the deep sea waters of the Pacific Ocean. Currently, the depth and breadth of the eastern seas under China's actual control, especially the Yellow Sea are very limited. Without the deep sea, the effectiveness of our marine strategic forces and the corresponding sea control rights necessary for China's modernization development will be greatly restricted. Therefore, whether from an economic or political perspective, or from a sovereignty or maritime power, the Taiwan issue has become the main bottleneck for China to advance the deep sea. In other words, if the security boundary of contemporary China cannot be extended to Taiwan's eastern border, China cannot even be called a Pacific country. In this way, China's goal of fully achieving a moderately prosperous society cannot be achieved, and even if its achievements are achieved, it cannot be guaranteed. The core lesson of the Ukrainian issue is: we must continue to promote the unification strategy, adopt matching strategies and tactics when necessary, and quickly complete the reunification of the motherland.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-