Recently, the US House Speaker Pelosi 's plan to visit Taiwan caused shock at home and abroad. Our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council spoke out one after another, expressing a solemn position on this matter. His decisive attitude and tough words also caused an uproar, causing politicians in the White House, including US President Biden , to come forward to "cool down". The news spread to the island. Zhao Shaokang, the founder of the new party, responded on July 22. His remarks were quite like a child's fighting spirit, which was very interesting.
Zhao Shaokang believes that whether American politicians visit Taiwan is not something that Taiwan can decide, and the initiative is completely in the hands of the United States. The mainland is unhappy with the United States, but it often "vents its anger" with Taiwan. Taiwan has inexplicably become a burden of anger. Wouldn't it be unfair?
Zhao Shaokang said that the frequent "harsh words or threats by force" in the mainland will only increase the disgust of the people of Taiwan, resulting in the mainland's various friendly concessions to Taiwan being offset by the "military threat", which instead encourages the arrogance of the DPP authorities and makes its status more stable.
Zhao Shaokang finally said that since the mainland claims that "Chinese people do not beat Chinese people", then don't treat Taiwan as a "punching bag", but directly ask the United States to vent its anger. He did not forget to give advice, saying that American ships and aircraft frequently orbit around the mainland and Taiwan under the name of "free navigation", and the People's Liberation Army could do it as usual. The Liaoning, Shandong and Fujian aircraft carriers have been launched one after another. The People's Liberation Army, which has a strong military presence, should not "threaten Taiwan", but should drive them to Hawaii or California to show off their "national prestige" to the United States.
Zhao Shaokang is a typical "deep blue person". Although he is biased against the mainland in terms of politics, his national identity is still "Chinese". He also opposes "Taiwan independence". He has watched all kinds of programs he appears on the screen. Although there are also fallacies, it is generally based on "1992 Consensus ", which is beneficial and harmless for cross-strait peace and stability.
Zhao Shaokang's argument is obviously also full of energy. As for where the energy comes from, whether it comes from extortion from the United States, or "resentment" towards the mainland, or both, it is still difficult to determine. But what is certain is that his remarks must be biased.
Detailed review of the speeches of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, mainly expressed three meanings: First, it expresses its position and requires the US to not arrange for Pelosi to visit Taiwan; second, it is to issue advice. If the US insists on its own way, then China will take effective measures to resolutely respond and counter them; third, it is to warn the separatist forces of Taiwan independence that any attempt to collude with external anti-China forces to seek "independence" will be self-destructive.
It is not difficult to see that the mainland's "venting anger" pointed out clearly at the United States and "Taiwan independence" elements, and did not have any verbal or force to the Taiwanese people.
Perhaps in Zhao Shaokang's view, he blamed the People's Liberation Army's frequent cruises in the Taiwan Strait recently and the prohibition of importing Taiwanese agricultural products from the mainland due to security check issues, which caused a grievance of "suffering the enemy". However, the PLA's airspace cruise is a matter of course, and the imposition of Taiwan's agricultural products into the mainland was simply because the Taiwan authorities' inaction has caused the quality of agricultural products not to meet the input standards, which makes the mainland even more unresponsible.
As for Zhao Shaokang's claim that the People's Liberation Army should follow the example of the US military and drive aircraft carriers to California or Hawaii to promote its "national prestige". At first glance, there may be some truth, but China is not the United States, so there is no need to openly violate international law and make such provocative actions.
There is an old saying in our country that three people must have a teacher, and choose the good ones and follow them. Looking at the various bad deeds since the founding of the United States, it is obviously not the good ones. Could it be that the United States has built military bases all over the world, wantonly torture the sovereignty and territory of other countries, and China also wants to show off its military power and intend to dominate? Could it be that the United States has formed cliques and launched a large-scale camp confrontation, and China also wants to make allies to create a "new Cold War"?
China needs to follow the path of independent development, and there is no need to follow the United States astray.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-