media squeezed in the small attic. (Photo source: Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News")
China Taiwan Network reported on November 29 that a strange thing happened on the island in the past two days. The Democratic Progressive Party, which has always known as "democracy" and pursues "democracy", when the "Legislative Yuan" led by it held a meeting, actually restricted reporters from staying in the interview area on the second floor loft and being quarantined from the meeting site.
This incident aroused high dissatisfaction among the media on the island, and caused a bombing of the "isolated" democracy of the Democratic Progressive Party, and "legislators" of the Taiwan ruling and opposition also argued for this. Taiwanese media pointed out that in the past, the DPP used snake cages to reject Ma Ying-jeou authorities and always used sarcastic means to ridicule Ma. Now, after taking office, various "isolation" and "restriction" methods are more than above the Ma authorities, which is particularly ironic.
The original reporter area on the 9th floor of Qunxian Building on the "Financial Committee" was cleared.
This incident occurred at the meeting of the "Finance Committee of the Legislative Yuan" held on the 27th. According to Taiwan's "Dongsen News Cloud", the reporter was notified long before the meeting that the interview location changed the practice of being behind the "committee" seats over the years and was arranged in the attic on the second floor. As far as distance is concerned, it seems far away and is not allowed to enter. In the face of the sudden change of , the reporters at the financial line were stunned and even angry.
Taiwan's China Times pointed out that in addition to the "Court Conference" conference, the "Financial Committee" and the "Judicial Committee" both set up media areas, deliberately distinguishing the media from the "committee" seats. When in the "Securities Committee", the reporter sat behind the "Committee" and could only see the back of his head; in the "Financial Committee", the reporter was confined to the attic, causing the reporter to burst into the corridor outside the venue, and the media complained about .
reporter was quarantined to the second floor. (Photo source: Taiwan's "Dongsen News Cloud")
It is reported that when registering for speeches, Lu Xiuyan, a Kuomintang "legislator" who was once a reporter, took the lead in opening the tent and said that the "Legislative Yuan" said that the "Committee" should implement the "Committee" centralism. As a result, after a weekend, the reporters were rushed to the attic, and such an arrangement was not approved by the "Committee". The Kuomintang "legislator" Fei Hongtai , who served as the "Convening Committee of the Finance Committee", supported him and said that as the chairman of the meeting, he had never been notified of such adjustments.
"Secretary Letter of the Director of the Finance Committee" Lin Shangmin said that the change in the conference room was mainly decided by the decision of "Legislative President" Su Jiaquan and the Secretary-General of the Secretary Letter of Zhijia, who hoped that the operation of the meeting would not be too chaotic, so that the reporters and the questioning district would be separated. Fei Hongtai questioned that the "Legislative Yuan Secretary" was not qualified to instruct the "Committee" what to do, and to make adjustments, they had to report to the "Legislative Yuan".
Wu Bingrui (Photo source: Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News")
Unexpectedly, "legislator" Wu Bingrui criticized the "Blue Committee" and "pleased the media ", saying that every time the "Legislative Yuan" pushes, the photographer will squeeze forward, affecting other people's interviews. The "Legislative Yuan" spends money to renovate the upstairs space of the "Financial Committee", which he thinks is very reasonable. He also said that if Fei Hongtai insisted on letting reporters go to the "committee" for interview, he would not want to make progress or change.
"Legislator of the Power of the Times" Huang Guochang rarely agreed with the Kuomintang's opinions yesterday, criticizing the whole matter. The "Legislative Yuan Secretary" never notified the "Financial Committee Member" and "Why should the Secretary General of the Secretariat make this decision?" "Blue Committee" Zeng Mingzong angrily criticized Wu Bingrui. "The Legislative Yuan" spent so much money to repair, but no one knew, but who has the right to isolate the reporter and said that this is a change of "progress"? "I said this is a fundamental change of regression!"
Lu Xiuyan emphasized that she is not trying to please reporters. She has been a reporter for 11 years. If we follow Wu Bingrui's logic, everyone would just go out to watch the live broadcast, and there would be no need to interview at all. Fei Hongtai's final ruling brought the media back to the "committee" for interview.
"Legislative Yuan" staged a water polo battle earlier. (Photo source: Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News")
According to "Dongsen News Cloud", this arrangement will be traced back to the last meeting.During the joint "committee", the blue and green "legislators" staged a big fight in the auditorium on the 9th floor, and then the "water polo man" incident occurred. Media interns threw water balls with the Kuomintang "legislators". Since then, the "Legislative Yuan" evaluates the reconstruction project of the "Committee".
According to reports, financial reporters are not angry . The "Ministry of Finance" Press Association has sent a letter to Su Jiaquan, Lin Zhijia, and the "Legislative Yuan" Press Association.
According to "Dongsen News Cloud", the reconstruction of the conference room of the "Financial Committee" is not a precedent. After the "Water Pool Man" incident, the first passive knife modification was the "Journal Committee". It also caused dissatisfaction in the journalist circle at that time. The media was isolated at the end. The officials were right in front of the media, with a low wall in the middle. They were not allowed to enter the venue, and the inquiry and questioning tables were cancelled, resulting in the photojournalists who could only photograph the "back of the heads" of the officials. This plan is jokingly called by the outside world like entering a "court". There are voices criticizing that the DPP authorities are "isolated" democracy .
Huang Zhixian . (Photo source: Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News")
"In this way, will no longer be able to capture any ambiguous text messages between the DPP's legislator and which beautiful anchor, the DPP can finally feel at ." The island's political commentator Huang Zhixian criticized on Facebook on the evening of the 28th that the DPP took advantage of the recess, and did not notify any opposition parties, nor did the "committee" pass, and directly carried out large-scale construction. As soon as the discussion started, Fei Hongtai found that the reporter was isolated in a transparent animal cage on the second floor, away from the "committee" scene.
She said that even during the martial law period, the "Legislative Yuan Committee" allowed reporters to observe the "legislators" closely, and it has not changed in 50 years. No matter how autocratic the Kuomintang is, it will not dare to drive the reporter out. Otherwise, how could it be taken in Zhu Gaozheng's (the then "legislator" of the DPP) who jumped onto the table and more photos of the DPP's paralyzed discussions? Now that he is in power, he says that this will not be progressive.
Huang Zhixian, The reason for the DPP is very simple, that is, the DPP is always right, and the people only support the DPP’s freedom!
On March 23, 2014, the "anti-service trade" people gathered around the Taiwan authorities' "Executive Yuan" to confront the police. Tsai Ing-wen (front left) arrived to sit quietly.
The China Times published an article titled "The opposition shouts about human rights and ruling to engage in authoritarianism" pointed out that the DPP always talks about human rights during the opposition. When the people took to the streets to resist horses, the DPP criticized the Horse authorities for using snake cages to resist horses as "martial law." In the "Sunflower Student Movement" in March 2014, the "Green Committee" played the role of the escort angel of students to protect protesting students from entering and leaving the "Legislative Yuan".
During his tenure as a "legislator", Zheng Lijun even brought Chen Weiting, Lin Feifan and others into the "Legislative Yuan Education Committee" to discuss anti-media monopoly, staged a farce in which students openly "questioned" officials.
Tsai Ing-wen went out to participate in the event, and the special service police and other about a thousand police officers were suspected of reaching the anti-terrorism level.
article says , after the DPP, which attaches the most importance to human rights, suddenly changed its standards after it came to power. Every time the "Legislative Yuan" received a campaign of Chen Kang, a large number of police forces must have surrounded him layer by layer. The snake cage was used more than before, and even several more layers were added, so the surrounding was not airtight. The opposition party’s “legislator” smuggled into Chen Kang’s “Court” area and would be criticized by the ruling party for bringing the mob in. When Tsai Ing-wen attended, the security guard was even more indifferent, and even fixed and concentrated Chen Kang's people in one area.
After the Democratic Progressive Party came to power, the media's interview space in the Legislative Yuan has been repeatedly limited, which is completely contrary to the "openness" and "transparency" that the Democratic Progressive Party always says.
article says that Wu Bingrui's unintentional words actually reveal the arrogance of the DPP after taking power. It turns out that the so-called "progress" of the DPP is not the progress of human rights or freedom and democracy, but the "progress" that makes the DPP more convenient for doing things, which is to eradicate all things that are not conducive to itself and isolate all things that are unfavorable to governance. The DPP's ruling style is more authoritative than the Malaysian authorities. (China Taiwan Network Li Ning)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-