The article I published on September 1 "Latest News on Last Year's Performance Bonus: The 2021 Performance Bonus was issued at the end of August" talked about the fact that a teacher's location distributed an average of many performance bonuses in other places that have not been distributed or have only distributed a part of the performance bonuses in 2021 that may have been cancelled. That is just the latest news about last year's performance bonuses as of the time of writing that article.
In fact, what we want to talk about today is the latest news about last year's performance bonus. Today I saw a teacher posting information related to this (as shown in the picture above), saying that the local government issued a basic performance bonus of 16,900 yuan in the 12-month performance bonus for the whole year of 2021 and a total of 20 months from January to August this year. This year, the average amount of 1,400 yuan per month after the month is 1,400 yuan, which is 800 yuan less than last year's monthly average.
Since the cleanup and standardization of government incentive subsidies (now called performance bonuses) in July last year, many local government agencies and institutions have divided the performance bonuses issued at one time at the end of the year from January this year into basic performance bonuses (about two-thirds) and annual assessment prizes (about one-third) and allocated the basic performance prizes to be distributed every month. The standards are different, and the annual assessment prizes are distributed after the year-end assessment.
Many teachers in the local area have been paying performance bonuses before compared the total amount of performance bonuses distributed to the month since January this year (and some places have started from the second half of last year) with the total amount of performance bonuses distributed to the year end. They found that the total amount of performance bonuses distributed to the month is about 800 yuan less than the total amount of performance bonuses distributed to the year end in the year end in the month.
The reason why government subsidies for government agencies and institutions is to be cleaned up and regulated because many places have issued or added distribution projects on their own in addition to subsidy projects stipulated by the state or arbitrarily increase the original prescribed standards. The larger regional gap between units and departments is to establish a standardized distribution system and supervision and restraint mechanism.
In addition, the repeated impact of the epidemic in recent years has caused a large decline in local fiscal revenue, which will also make the budget of fiscal expenditure more tight. Although some places have adopted the distribution of equal distribution to monthly, it has become a fact that the total amount of equal distribution to monthly performance bonus has decreased. Is there any possibility of an increase in the future? The answer is of course yes. Now we advocate living a tight life. After the epidemic is over, it is inevitable to appropriately raise the distribution standards.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-