The Kuomintang's "Legislative Yuan" party group pointed out that the DPP authorities have repeatedly claimed that the annual budget will continue to remain in surplus after taking office, but the fact is that over the past five years, the authorities have borrowed nearly 2 trilli

Source: Voice of the Straits

Recently, Taiwan’s “Legislative Yuan” will start reviewing next year’s budget. The Kuomintang's "Legislative Yuan" party group pointed out that the DPP authorities have repeatedly claimed that the annual budget will continue to remain in surplus after taking office, but the fact is that over the past five years, the authorities have borrowed nearly 2 trillion yuan ( New Taiwan Dollar , the same below) special budget. Some "legislators" criticized the DPP for spending money that is opaque and full of "black boxes", leaving all the problems created by this generation to the next generation!

has statistics from "legislators". Within five years after the DPP authorities came to power, a special budget of 1927.2 billion yuan was compiled, including 840 billion yuan in forward-looking infrastructure, 247.2 billion yuan in new fighter jets, and 840 billion yuan in relief and revitalization of new coronavirus pneumonia. In addition, the recent new defense department has issued 200 billion yuan in new missiles, which has cost taxpayers more than 2 trillion yuan.

The Internet has memory. Before taking office, the DPP was extremely sensitive to debt issues and was "just in trouble." Taipei City Councilman Wang Hongwei posted a sarcastic article that in the past, when the Kuomintang was in power, the DPP criticized the debt for "debt to keep descendants", but now Tsai Ing-wen has surpassed former leader Ma Ying-jeou, "The DPP repeatedly slapped itself in the face!"

As early as 2008 when Ma Ying-jeou was running for leadership, the DPP camp focused his finger on the "June 33" policy proposed. Tse Changting, a candidate from the Democratic Progressive Party who was competing with Malaysia at the time, strongly criticized the Malaysian policy and would "expand the authorities' deficit, promote inflation, , raise taxes across Taiwan, keep debts behind descendants, and expand the gap between the rich and the poor, and the people are the victims." He also emphasized that if we continue to invest like Ma, "we can tie up the piles. Some people make some money, but in fact, very few people return to the people." This criticism is more appropriate now for the DPP authorities.

When Ma Ying-jeou ran for re-election in 2011, the DPP once again pulled the debt problem to the media camera and criticized Ma Ying-jeou as the "most prodigal" leader of Taiwan. At that time, Ma Ying-jeou borrowed 1.3 trillion yuan, which is not much compared to the DPP authorities' 2 trillion yuan. When Ma Ying-jeou was in power, he encountered an Asian financial tsunami, and the whole world adopted the loose monetary policy to promote infrastructure construction. But these key information were intentionally cut off by the DPP. The DPP even "talked loudly" and said, "If this continues, Taiwan will definitely go bankrupt!"

to the end of Ma Ying-jeou's second term, which is the eve of the new round of elections, and the debt issue has heated up again. The green media Liberty Times attacked the Malaysian authorities in an article in January 2015, saying that Taiwan is in a "society and arrogant society with debts to keep its descendants." The article points out that "In order to win the election, those in power have no idea where the money comes from, but they have endless random checks, causing the authorities' debt to increase year by year. This attitude and practice of keeping their descendants in debt is infinitely lamentable." All kinds of descriptions are simply a true portrayal of the DPP authorities at this moment.

The article then changed the subject and used the self-reported method of a retired teacher or a retired public official who did not want to be named to express himself and his family's pensions were too high, implying that the pensions of public officials were too high, which led to the continuous escalation of debts, which paved the way for the DPP authorities to cut the pensions of retired military, public education, police and consumer groups after they came to power.

If the "debt standards" established by the DPP for others over the years are used to test itself, I am afraid that the DPP today will be ousted by the DPP yesterday. However, with the DPP taking office, the debt-raising incident has broken free from disastrous consequences such as "debt keeps descendants" and "Taiwan bankruptcy", and has become the "golden key" to revitalize the economy, and has become a "major positive" in the process of epidemic prevention, disaster relief, relief and improvement of defense levels.

Previously, a "legislator" pointed out that the special budget debt quota is not subject to the 15% traffic limit of the "Public Debt Act". Abuse of special budgets has become the normal operation of the DPP. Some people point out that the DPP uses special budgets to evade supervision, just like using an executive order to open up the "Lay Pig (including Lake Dopamine American Pig)". Su Zhenchang was the "Premier" for two years, and Taiwan's average debt per person increased by 35,000 to 260,000; while the authorities' hidden debt has exceeded 15.8 trillion.

The DPP authorities have raised a lot of debts, which is not only a confusion of economic policies, but also various political opportunities. They not only defeated the current "hard-for-working money" of the Taiwanese people, but also continued to transfer the next generation's budget to factions and external forces. "Green fat and thin people" has become a true portrayal of the livelihood situation on the island. This is a serious erosion and exploitation of the interests and well-being of the Taiwanese people, and will inevitably be punished by public opinion.